Rage against the intellectual

The responses to Gurmehar’s fearless speech come at a time when the monstrous rage against the intellectual has been growing, both in India and beyond.

Written by Janaki Nair | Published:March 10, 2017 12:19 am
Gurmehar Kaur. Screengrab.

It would be a grave mistake to understand the fierce online and openly politicised attack on Gurmehar Kaur’s video as only another breach of free expression, or just another display of Indian misogyny. Far more disturbing signs are revealed. The responses to Gurmehar’s fearless speech come at a time when the monstrous rage against the intellectual has been growing, both in India and beyond. One of the main casualties of this rising anti-intellectualism is the refusal of those attacking our institutions, individuals and practices to engage with the fullness of speech, its metaphoric nuances, its cadences and abstractions, even its confusions.

We had a brief glimpse of this collective failing in India when the former RBI governor, Raghuram Rajan, was severely maligned for referring to the “bright spot” interpretation of the Indian economy as a case of the one-eyed king in the land of the blind. But the murders of Pansare, Dabholkar and Kalburgi are proof of the violence against thinking differently.

With each passing day, the examples of such anti-intellectualism have proliferated. As a result, a courageous attempt to reach beyond the belligerence and war paint of two neighbours locked in battle, to point to peace as an achievable ideal, has been grievously misunderstood. It was a call for the leaders of both these nations to show true statesmanship in resolving issues and making the world a safer place for more Indians and Pakistanis. These are the thoughtful words of a young person expressing hope in the most poetic way available to her. We might well ask: What if Gurmehar had borrowed her eloquence from other peace activists, say, M.K. Gandhi or Martin Luther King or Desmond Tutu? Would she have been denounced as loudly and for as long? Still considered as “polluted”? Still tyrannised for thinking differently?

We will not know. But we do know that the Indian people today are never too far away (quite literally, a stone’s throw away) from those for whom education has thwarted appreciation of the finer aspects of language and art, theatre and music, argumentation and persuasion. The distrust of intellectuals wears many guises. It has of late revealed itself in the increasing trust placed by the government in bureaucrats, technologists and scientists to head India’s premier scholarly and educational institutions. We increasingly inhabit an educational system rooted in a deeply held belief that science and technology alone are worthy of awe and moral authority; they are less partial and partisan than those from the social sciences and the humanities.

Forget their un-encashability, all such disciplines are “residual”, gathering together only those failures who cannot make the science grade. That the new Nalanda Chancellor Vijay Bhatkar, a computer scientist, could blithely participate in Vedic rituals and a hawan to “resurrect” the true spirit of Nalanda, one of the many Buddhist monasteries that flourished before that religion declined in India, is no contradiction in these anti-intellectual times.
We are getting accustomed to the use of both “facticity” and “sentiment” in this offensive against intellectuals. On the one hand, Harvard- or Oxford-trained economists are dispensable and mocked at by the “man of the poor,” their place taken by the unquestionable certainties of government statistics. On the other hand, if our universities are currently being turned into obedience schools, it is in the name of a church-like piety and sentiment about nationalism.

Only a nervous and insecure regime distrusts its intellectuals and the university as the space of critical intellection. Therefore, a new “resacralisation” of the relation between teacher and student in the time of democracy (consider the Gurukul fellowships now offered by the ICHR) is accompanied by the clamour to “militarise” the campuses. The now-expelled RSS pracharak Kundan Chandrawat who announced a bounty for Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan’s head, averred that “communists” must have been responsible for denying him permission to work on the political ideas of both Ambedkar and Golwalkar for his PhD. One could see “a red under every bed” as responsible for the sorry state of Indian universities, but that is not only crediting the left with too much power, it is denying history.

The distrust and persecution of intellectuals has many notorious precedents, in regimes of both the right and the left, in the long 20th century. Sustained anti-intellectualism hounded poets and scholars, scientists and musicians into silence or simply did away with their inconvenient truth. Germany in the 1930s, the Soviet Union in Stalin’s era, Mao’s Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, Recip Erdogan’s Turkey in our own times. In each historical case, scores of intellectuals have been “disappeared”, were undermined or denigrated in the name of a greater national/proletarian good. Julian Barnes’s imaginative bio-novel on the fate of composer Dmitri Shostakovich should be a must-read for those interested in these histories, if the anti-English tenor of current anti-intellectualism can be set aside.

No more will our universities be the “kuthuhala-shalas” (curiosity centres ) of early India where people may have gathered to discuss things and exercise curiosity, as the very word “kuthuhala” suggests. Regardless of whether they existed or not, since they were written about long after the time of the Buddha when they may have
existed, that they were remembered at all should give us a sense of the rich life of the mind to which we are heir. But the life of the mind is indeed what has become an unbearable challenge for those whose anti-intellectual chants now fill our university spaces.

The writer teaches history at the Centre for Historical Studies, JNU

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. H
    Hemant Kumar
    Mar 10, 2017 at 3:53 am
    The writer is like atheist whose views are reflected here. They are sure to be declared pagan, heretic.
    Reply
    1. O
      Onkar Singh
      Mar 10, 2017 at 12:40 pm
      With the coming of Modi as PM, the pent up emotions of the most crude emotions of the so called Deshbhakts are find their outbursts, similar to the cheapest outbursts of Modi himself: Kabristan,Shamshaan, "narial ka juice" when the person whom he was " taunting" had said was "pineapple juice" made in Manipur.If all these things are being appreciated by the educated supporters of the BJP,some deep-seated " sickness of the mind" is revealing itself in the public domain.Jung in one of his books had written that prior to the world war led by Hitler,he diagnosed many ( in thousands) who were sick in mind,and this sickness resulted in the Holocaust.See the responses in the comments section,the low and cheap standard of criticism of those who can't cogently and logically counter the opposite point of view.Sadder still is that these are accommodated when these should be deleted.That brings down the level of debate.
      Reply
      1. Y
        Yogi_Bear
        Mar 10, 2017 at 3:27 am
        Another POST-TRUTH author spotted. Dont understand why you guys expose your self, Many incident took place after gurmehar ( like suhana ) but you guys still on Gurmehar (Manited Issue) casue it serve your interest and opportunity to earn some money by re-writing same articles from a-z,z-a,a-o,o-a, feel some shame. You using gurmehar to earn money and in bonous also try to sound like freedom bird. Which is also aly selective.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt; And Stop considering ur self "INTELLECTUAL". Every person seating on opposite side of table does not become intellectual or vice-versa, its just ur opnion, and which is more than manition.
        Reply
        1. Y
          Yogi_Bear
          Mar 10, 2017 at 3:32 am
          Trump Won due to people like you, who alway project Truth as Post-Truth which is far away from reality. Projecting "Rai ka pahad" . Due to just you hate Government, trying to express anger by writing useless and manited data.
          Reply
          1. Y
            Yogi_Bear
            Mar 10, 2017 at 7:59 am
            they can see murder of Dabholkar, which is bad, but nothing to do with intolerance mind set of india, its happening from ages, just due to superfast/pro media its Labled as "Rise intolerant india"lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Dont you see murders by left in kerla and other parts?? Have you gone blind?? Dont you see "killer idealogy" of left?... which you nicely "tolerated".
            Reply
            1. P
              Prabhakr
              Mar 10, 2017 at 10:19 am
              Leftist writers had already done the worse they can in every aspect of life spclly history. But this is information world now they are starting exposing.Now no more intellectual violence or nataion disastrous ideology.you world is collapsing we will take our country back.
              Reply
              1. R
                Rajat
                Mar 10, 2017 at 1:50 am
                Didn't bother to read the article after I found out who is the author.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;"monstrous rage against the intellectual has been growing" in the description is funny. How she labels herself as intellectual. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;The reason for the rage is their hypocrisy which has been exposed thanks to the social media. So much for their pseudo-intellectualism.
                Reply
                1. R
                  Rajat
                  Mar 10, 2017 at 1:52 am
                  I would like to have a one on one debate with this intellectual, will shred into pieces all the specious arguments she has made in the article.
                  Reply
                  1. R
                    Rajat
                    Mar 10, 2017 at 12:25 pm
                    चुप बे
                    Reply
                    1. Z
                      zizek
                      Mar 10, 2017 at 6:56 am
                      This is what happened in Gurmehar's case:lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Gurmehar: stan did not kill my father. War killed him.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Hooda: She is being used as a pawn (note that his remarks were in regards to her age and not her gender).lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Media: You are too misogynist Hooda for thinking that a 20 year old LADY can't come up with opinions on her own.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Sehwag: I did not score two triple centuries. My bat did.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Media: Shame on you Sehwag for not understanding the emotions of a 20 year old KID.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Regarding this article, if I were given 10 Rs. for every unreasonable statements made here, I would be a millionaire today!
                      Reply
                      1. Z
                        zizek
                        Mar 10, 2017 at 8:11 am
                        This is what happened in Gurmehar's case:lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Kaur: stan did not kill my father. War killed him.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Hooda: She is being used as a pawn (note that his comments were in regard to her age and not her gender).lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Media: You are too misogynist Hooda for thinking that a 20 year old lady can't come up with opinions on her own. You go girl!lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Sehwag: I did not score two triple centuries. My bat did.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Media: Shame on you Sehwag for not understanding the emotions of a 20 year old kid. You go girl!lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;Regarding this article, if I were given 10 Rs. for every unreasonable statement made here, I would be a millionaire today!
                        Reply
                        1. J
                          Joe
                          Mar 10, 2017 at 2:40 am
                          Your declaration totally settles everything objectively!!!! You are the man!!!
                          Reply
                          1. J
                            Joe
                            Mar 12, 2017 at 5:15 am
                            Your reply just proves my point, and you are probably too thick to realize it.
                            Reply
                            1. A
                              Ajay G
                              Mar 10, 2017 at 1:19 pm
                              Those intellectuals who have resilience will survive. Others are anyway fake. Better they perish.
                              Reply
                              1. N
                                Nisha Rao
                                Mar 10, 2017 at 6:17 am
                                I CHALLANGE YOU TO WRITE ARTICLE WHICH DOES NOT HAVE WORDS LIKE "RSS","BJP", "RIGHT" , I KNOW YOU CANT. IT WILL NOT SERVE YOUR INTEREST NOR IT WILL PROJECT YOU AS INTELLECTUAL. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;NOWADYS ITS CONDIION, UNTILL YOU NOT SPEAK AGAINST GOVT( AND NOT REAL ISSUES ) YOU WILL NOT GET ADMISSION INTO PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL CLUB. IRONY!!lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt; YOU GUYS ARE NOT TRAINED TO THINK PROGRESSIVELY BUT NEGATIVELY
                                Reply
                                1. N
                                  Nisha Rao
                                  Mar 10, 2017 at 5:45 am
                                  Todays right are Neo-Left. Left lost their ground to right and now they fighting for servival by trying to look like intellectual. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;They used to think "Intellectualism is birth right of Left" which totally exposed now. What eating india and world is not right idealogy but a pseudo-intellectualism who always projecting truth as Post-Truth which is full of Selectivism and personal vendetta. Rightist are as liberal as anyone, If you consider me as 'rightist' (according to your idealogy) but i do respect women, belive in freespeech, against corruption, open market and economy but no selective. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;When AIB issue came All 'intellectual' started defending in name of Free Speech which is ok and humour, but when sehwag made up joke as part of is humor he labled as 'RSS' worker. Thats where intellectual exposed. By projecting Gurmehar gate as act of mysogyny, then being women i can say you are Se-xist.
                                  Reply
                                  1. A
                                    Ali Raza
                                    Mar 10, 2017 at 3:41 am
                                    Thank you, the Comments section, for restoring our faith in humanity and human sanity.
                                    Reply
                                    1. A
                                      Arvind
                                      Mar 10, 2017 at 4:50 pm
                                      Rage against pseudo intellectuals. I am sure they are capable of addressing their failed ideas and concocted history now that it is finally being challenged after 70 years. Its a bogus narrative that cannot survive it was never challenged.
                                      Reply
                                      1. A
                                        Abhinav Anand
                                        Mar 10, 2017 at 2:10 pm
                                        So people who disagree with these self acclaimed intellectuals are anti- intellectual.These intellectuals seem to have studied beyond their intelligence.
                                        Reply
                                        1. G
                                          G V
                                          Mar 10, 2017 at 8:10 am
                                          These free thinkers have no moral values.
                                          Reply
                                          1. A
                                            Ansh
                                            Mar 10, 2017 at 3:33 am
                                            Who is a intellectual. What has he done for the country. What kind of previlages he enjoys. Merely writing in foreign language and having contacts does not make one intellectual. There should be debate on this.
                                            Reply
                                            1. Load More Comments