From plate to plough: An unfulfilled farm manifesto

On agriculture, three years into the Modi government, while many steps have been taken to realise promises made in 2014, others have fallen by the wayside

Written by Ashok Gulati , Siraj Hussain | Published:May 22, 2017 1:17 am
narendra modi, modi govt, 3 years of modi govt, nda flagship, acche din, mnrega,pradhan mantri krishi yojana, pradhan mantri bima yojana,Swachh Bharat, prime minister modi,fci,  ugc, aicte, india news, modi news, bjp govt, nda govt The BJP manifesto promised that the government would introduce crop planning based on soil assessment with mobile soil testing labs set up.

With the Modi government completing three years in office, it is time to assess its performance in various sectors. We focus here on agriculture. Without robust growth in agriculture, “sabka saath, sabka vikas” will remain an empty slogan.

There are two ways to evaluate the Modi sarkar’s performance: One, to evaluate its flagship programmes in agriculture and see their impact. The other is to go back to the BJP’s 2014 manifesto, and see how many of those promises have been fulfilled.

In an earlier article, (‘The faraway fields’, IE, April 24) we evaluated the NDA’s flagship programmes, especially the Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchayee Yojana (PMKSY), Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) and e-NAM. The conclusion was that they were all steps in the right direction but so far, their impact has not been felt. Perhaps tangible results won’t be seen before 2019.

Here, we look at major promises made in the election manifesto and how far the Modi government has progressed in turning those promises into reality. The BJP manifesto stated: “BJP commits highest priority to agricultural growth, increase in farmers’ income and rural development. BJP will increase public investment in agriculture and rural development; take steps to enhance profitability in agriculture by ensuring a minimum of 50 per cent profits over the cost of production, cheaper agriculture inputs and credit, introducing latest technologies and high-yielding seeds and linking MGNREGA to agriculture.”

There were other promises too, in terms of bringing down food inflation, creating a price stabilisation fund and reforming the food management system by unbundling FCI into three parts, the dissemination of real-time data to farmers, and setting up a National Agriculture Market. The manifesto promised that the government would introduce crop planning based on soil assessment with mobile soil testing labs set up.

On the completion of three years, we find that while a number of steps have been taken to realise these promises, several others have fallen by the wayside. There is hardly any talk now of ensuring 50 per cent profit to farmers; instead, we are grappling with the new promise of doubling farmers’ incomes in five years. The reforms in the food management sector have been almost forgotten. There has been hardly any initiative to try DBT for food subsidy on a large-scale despite the recommendation of the high-level committee under Shanta Kumar.

The idea of a price stabilisation fund, which started with a corpus of Rs 500 crore to tackle high onion prices, has enlarged to more than Rs 3,500 crore, building a buffer stock of pulses of almost 2 million tonnes. Given the short shelf life of pulses, the challenge is to continuously rotate this stock to stabilise prices. Since most states are reluctant to distribute pulses under the PDS, procuring agencies will have to sell in the open market or give to large organisations like the army. So far, just 1.2 lakh tonnes have been sold from the buffer stock; even the quantity procured/imported in 2015-16 is yet to be disposed of. That is worrying as quality will deteriorate fast.

Another major initiative of the government was to issue soil health cards to all farmers once in two years. Building from the experience of Gujarat, the idea was that farmers will make good use of information and the application of fertilisers will be in accordance with soil needs. A target of 14 crore cards was fixed against which six crore cards have been distributed so far. Most states have shown only a lukewarm response; hence, expected benefits of the application of appropriate doses of fertiliser have not been experienced. UP, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan and Bihar have shown poor performance in testing soil samples.

There are indications that a major change in the procedure for the disbursement of the fertiliser subsidy is likely to be rolled out from July 2017. Fertiliser companies will be paid subsidy only when the dealer has actually sold the fertiliser. We do not think the scheme will take into account the health of soil and the actual need of nutrients while reimbursing subsidy to the companies.

A better way would have been to directly transfer the fertiliser subsidy to farmers’ accounts and free up fertiliser prices, as recommended by the Shanta Kumar panel. That would have automatically encouraged farmers to use the information available in the soil health cards.

And finally, a word about doubling farmers’ income which was announced by the PM in a public meeting at Bareilly on February 28, 2016. PM Modi said: “I urge all the states to give priority to agriculture and then see the changes.” Since then, the bureaucracy and Niti Aayog have been busy justifying how the doubling of farmers’ incomes in five years can be achieved, without officially spelling out whether this is real income or nominal income. For now, this slogan is just shifting the goal post of 50 per cent profits over cost.

Overall, agriculture is still limping at just 1.7 per cent annual average growth during the Modi government. A majority of farmers are struggling to survive.

Gulati is Infosys Chair Professor for Agriculture and Hussain is former Secretary Agriculture, GoI, and currently visiting Senior Fellow at ICRIER

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. V
    v b
    May 22, 2017 at 8:50 pm
    The States which focused attention seriously on agriculture have shown good results. These include Madhya Pradesh. The Central Government can approve Schemes to be adopted by individual State Governments. One of them is the bypassing of intermediaries who knock of more than 50 of what the consumer pays by farmers directly marketing their produce to consumers. A Write-up on this can be supplied to anyone requesting for the same. The operation of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Yojana can be improved by directing the PSU Insurance Company to ist farmers in drawing up the insurance claims, releasing a percentage (say, 10 of the claimed amount) as provisional payment pending verification of the claims, making individual farmer eligible for the insurance in the event of loss due to any reason including the price being less than normal etc.
    1. S
      Seshubabu Kilambi
      May 22, 2017 at 7:55 pm
      Agriculture has been neglected perennially and continues to be neglected even now
      1. V
        May 22, 2017 at 3:00 pm
        India achieved two agriculture revolutions, green and white. How? Farmer needs good inputs and market. Inputs can and were provided. Market was provided by FCI and cooperatives for cereals and cooperatives with NDDB support for milk. Government was the morale booster and support. Lessons can be replicated. Seems india has lost interest in agriculture production and the farmer. So, let's not waste time discussing it. Let's try to resurrect trade with foreign countries and corporations and do it well.
        1. M
          May 22, 2017 at 12:35 pm
          Marketing the produce has been a major problem.Because of lack of storage facilities the farmers are forced to resort to distress s.Take the recent case of chilly farmers in AP and Telangana.While at the market yards they had to sell at uneconomic prices,in the retail market the chilly prices did not show any downward trend.Every plan talked about expanding the storage facilities,but very little has been done in this direction.until this situation improves the farmers continue to be pawns in the hands of middle men
          1. E
            Embiar Khan
            May 22, 2017 at 10:32 am
            If this kind of evaluation of a party's performance vis-a-vis their election manifesto had been done for the Congress party all these years we would not have been where we are. The Congress party had a garibi hatao programme and we know how much garibi had been bataie and there was no one to make such evaluations. I would like to know from the authors of this piece if they had written such articles for the Congress regime.
            1. H
              Hemant Kumar
              May 22, 2017 at 10:23 am
              This writer is like a filthy pest in the Modi's g agriculture policy whereby farmers' income would be doubled in five years. His perspective is from a worm's eye. This is writer is well versed in emotional blackmail. Mr. Modi like has lifted the herculean task of welfare of farmers. This writer is supporting Ravana of vested interests. The concocted figures which he gives and hides more is part of his devilish agenda at the behest of his mai-baap. He is like one of characters in blind men and elephant story. He should sit in Krishi Bhawan to have a macro as well as micro view rather than be a frog in the well.
              1. S
                Shridhar Shettigar
                May 22, 2017 at 11:59 am
                Could you pl let us know what is your credentials to personally attack a person who is well versed in Agriculture..
                1. I
                  May 22, 2017 at 12:06 pm
                  Why does he need any qualifications in Agriculture. All he has to do is quote old scriptures and dramas. That immediately makes an authority in everything.
              2. A
                May 22, 2017 at 8:02 am
                A total revamp of agricultural research system including shutting down the monstrous glutton and good-for-nothing ICAR will facilitate farmers upliftment and free the agricultural sector from the shackles of bogus research. ICAR has become an old age home and cozy nest for useless researchers who are paid hefty ries for pedd rubbish. The all pervading "mutual back patting" has rendered ICAR ineffective, inefficient and incompetent to take on the humoungous challenges facing agriculturists. Scientists of ICAR retire at 62 years while all other central government employees including scientists of ISRO superannuate at 60 years. How can these oldies handle the physically demanding tasks of field visits? In today's computer savvy world, these dinosaurs are stumb blocks. Less said about agricultural universities and state agricultural departments, the better. Unless central government cracks the whip & takes radical, youth-friendly reforms, Indian agriculture is doomed.
                1. A
                  Jun 1, 2017 at 12:46 pm
                  Dear Adarsh, the harsh reality in life is people takes for granted the things and blame a system with very little knowledge about it. " Empty pot sounds more". You have repeatedly blamed the ICAR system by biasedness to ISRO or by the frustration I don't know but whatever you are eating today is due to the " old age home" and the farmers of India. But some people like you shall never be so generous to admit the same. Because you are taking food availability as granted. The contribution of agricultural science would have been realized if you at least read the history. How India became food bagger to the food exporter. Is it due to your so called "rocket scientist" or that "old age home"? Can "mutual back patting" would abled to increase the food grain production 3.7 times? I am not ignoring their contribution and proud for them but not the biased one like you. So my humble request is in future before any comment in such public forum please please read properly and then criticize.
                2. Load More Comments