From Plate to Plough: A finger on the pulses

Government must give a level playing field by removing restrictions on markets and exports

Written by Ashok Gulati | Published:March 15, 2017 12:05 am
pulses, pulses price, government economic policy, market policy, government market policy, market price pulses, narendra modi government Image for representational purposes.

Last year, roughly at this time, the price of tur dal (split pigeon pea) in the retail market was hovering around Rs 180/kg. The prices of other pulses were not far behind. They were all spiralling due to back-to-back droughts during 2014-15 and 2015-16. Production of all pulses had plunged to 16.5 million metric tonnes (MMT), and imports shot up to 5.8 MMT. The rising demand for imports from India also put international prices under pressure, especially for chickpeas from Australia. This caused hardships to poor consumers at home as dal was slipping away from their “dal-bhaat” or “dal-roti”, a survival food-kit of the poor. There were heightened concerns at the policy level to find ways and means to augment pulses supplies in general and tur in particular.

A long-term agreement was signed with Mozambique for the import of pulses. In fire-fighting mode to douse the flames of high inflation, the Government of India set up a committee under the chief economic advisor to solve this problem of pulses. It was important to have a fresh look at the pulses sector as over the last 25 years, policy had failed miserably to achieve self-sufficiency in pulses. So, it was clear that business as usual will not deliver.

One of the key findings of the committee was if farmers have to be incentivised to grow more pulses, and on a larger irrigated area, they must receive a sufficient profit from growing pulses. Given the levels of technology, it was realised that if farmers get about Rs 7,000/quintal for their produce, then pulses can compete with other crops. The ongoing minimum support prices (MSP) of kharif pulses hovered between Rs 4,625/quintal for tur and urad (black gram) to Rs 4,850/quintal for moong (green gram). Giving a massive jump from these levels to Rs 7,000/quintal in one go was considered politically difficult. So, it was thought it would be done over two years. But when the MSP for 2016-17 crops was announced, it was just Rs 5,050/quintal (including bonus) for tur and urad, and Rs 5,225/quintal for moong — far below their market prices.

Farmers responded to high market prices by planting more area under pulses, and a good rainfall helped them to reap a bumper harvest in 2016-17. Tur production, for example, shot up by a whopping 65 per cent, from 2.5 MMT to 4.2 MMT, while overall, pulses production went up by 33 per cent, from 16.5 MMT to 22 MMT. The result was a massive drop in the market price of tur, from about Rs 10,000/quintal in September-October 2016 to Rs 4,000-4,500/quintal in February-March 2017, even below the MSP. Private trade was not allowed to hold onto much stock, exports were banned and government procurement was not enough to hold the floor at the MSP. Obviously, such low prices do not give much profit to pulses producers in relation to competing crops. So, hoping that farmers will remain upbeat on pulses and bring more irrigated area under pulses will remain a distant dream. The usual roller-coaster of high and low prices in pulses is likely to continue.

But all is not lost yet. There is still a chance that the government can rescue the situation, if it springs into action right away. Chickpea (chana) has started arriving in the market. It is India’s largest pulses crop, accounting for more than 40 per cent of total pulses production. Last year, chickpea production, as per government estimates, had fallen to 7 MMT, although the market assessment was below 6 MMT. But this year, chickpea production is expected to be around 9.1 MMT, a jump of 29 per cent. As a result, chickpea prices have been tumbling down. Although the prices are still a little above MSP, it won’t be a surprise if they also go below MSP very soon, as did tur prices.

Urgent action is needed if we are serious about solving the pulses problem. The least that the GoI can do is to give farmers a level playing field by removing restrictions on the functioning of free markets. This would imply action on five fronts. One, remove stocking limits on private trade, so that these enterprises can buy from the market and store. This policy should be announced for at least the next three years, if not more, so that private players are encouraged to buy and build ample storage capacity. Two, abolish bans or restrictions on exports of all pulses. If farmers can get a better price by exporting, why are they not permitted do so, especially when the system cannot even guarantee them MSP and imports are open? Let it be very clear that any bans or restrictions on exports are simply an implicit tax on the peasantry and an anti-farmer policy.

Three, introduce all pulses in futures trading. This way, farmers will get price signals well in advance. They should take planting decisions based on likely future prices, not last year’s market prices. They should be forward-looking, not backward-looking. This will be in sync with markets and can reduce the risk of planting decisions. Four, step up government procurement at MSP by engaging even private agencies, to build a buffer stock of 2 MMT. This is a golden opportunity and can also save farmers from a price crash. Five, impose an import duty of 5-10 per cent for the next three to six months to give a cover to farmers in post-harvest months.

Unless these actions are taken immediately, the pulses problem is not going to be resolved. And next year, consumers may once again face higher prices. Can the GoI bite the bullet?

The writer is Infosys Chair professor for agriculture at ICRIER

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. K
    K SHESHU
    Mar 15, 2017 at 2:19 pm
    Pulses are important for healthy nutrition. Their productin should be encouraged and resttictions should be lifted
    Reply
  2. Z
    Zaki
    Mar 15, 2017 at 6:09 pm
    Neolib clap trap. Deals with African countrs excellent policy, need to break any dependancy on countries expropriated by a prison potion, also known as Astralia.
    Reply
  3. C
    chander
    Mar 15, 2017 at 1:34 am
    Government policy with regard to pulses should be based on two factors. Benefit to Indian farmer and food security for Indian consumer. All actions should be on this two pronged policy only. All other actions should be subservient to the two policy actions.
    Reply
  4. K
    K.Jayakrishnan
    Mar 15, 2017 at 3:35 am
    yes futures trading should be allowed for farmers to get a good price and also plan their course of action. The govt should act on these recommendations of the author right away.
    Reply
  5. S
    SP
    Mar 15, 2017 at 9:07 am
    The writer is professor of agriculture but his recommendations are as economist. Even if he is an economist his recommendations are disastrous for the country India. Pulses production has to be raised in India since it is the main protein intake for the Indians and its production is not sufficient to take care. But , but , (a) exports , (b) on future trading (c) raising MSP (4) allowing free market forces for pulses are like trying to put policies by a foreign government so that all future Indians are dwarfs physically and mentally. This is a big statement but true , faithfully pointing to the real consequences. (1) India does not get better price on pulses by exports.Farmers will not get price for pulses by export. It is the exporter from India who gets more money - government subsidy . But India loses substantially because of hugely exploitative official foreign exchange rates and undesirable subsidy to the export firm / export agencies. Indian citizens are the final looser in terms of (a) high prices (b) monstrous distribution unbalance due to high prices of pulses in retail ( c) the poor cl / middle cl families rationing on pulses leading to deficient physical and mental growth - future dwarfs. 2. Allowing future trading on pulses.- allowing a few individuals to make huge money in Jua and for this money, artificially inflating the stocks and prices. 3. Raising MSP - this is nothing but giving huge subsidy money to farmers or the procurers / intermediaries. At the end the Indian citizens loose the tax money on undesirable subsidies ( big chunk goes to the agents) and also suffer all bad consequences of higher retail prices. 4. Allowing free market forces - It is like putting hungry and debilitated elephants in front of lions.Don't we need to control the market forces when there is acute shortage of an important nutrient in the long range? lt;br/gt; What is the solution ? Let the retail prices come down - no harm, better it will be , but give long range defined huge incentives directly to the farmers for growing and harvesting pulses - on water , on fertilizers , on electricity , on acreage , on good harvest and so on. This focused approach alone will save the Indian children from the disease converting them dwarfs.
    Reply
  6. R
    Raman Govindan
    Mar 18, 2017 at 5:46 am
    the student's movement against vietnam war in USA was not supported by t he opposition parties and they did not derive any benefit from it. lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;but the few ill treatment of dalit students in a campus for reasons only god knows, is made a big issue and all the opposition join together cobble an alliance to denigrate the govt.
    Reply
  7. V
    v b
    Mar 15, 2017 at 10:13 am
    In my belief the problem is lack of reliable aggregated data based on which farmers can take decision to plant any specific crop--in this case pulses. In these days when data can be aggregated and disseminated within minutes using computers instant communication. The failure of planning set-ups and Agricultural Departments should make known to farmers every day during each season the aggregate number of acres on which each crop including cereals and pulses has already been planted together with the estimated Demand for the output of that crop. Farmers are thereby enabled to grow the crops such that the Supply from farmers is neither in excess of nor short of Demand within the country.
    Reply
  8. Load More Comments