Foreign minister’s mis-steps

Sushma Swaraj short-circuited due process for Lalit Modi'

Written by Inder Malhotra | Published:July 6, 2015 1:37 am
Modi with Sushma during an IPL match in 2010. (Source: Express Archives) Lalit Modi with Sushma during an IPL match in 2010. (Source: Express Archives)

Since there has been a daily Niagara of words on the acute moral crisis in which the Narendra Modi sarkar is caught currently — on both 24×7 TV news channels and acres of newsprint — I would normally have refrained from joining this discussion. But I have to do so because neither in unending statements and speeches from the public platform nor during the hysterical talk shows on TV, in which the spokespersons of the BJP and Congress try to out-shout each other, has due attention been paid to what is arguably the most unacceptable, most deplorable and the worst part of the conduct in this squalid episode in the career of Sushma Swaraj, until a few days ago a deservedly respected external affairs minister and former leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha.

Let us forget for the nonce Lalit Modi’s stellar role in the shenanigans of the IPL, which most believe to be a cesspool of corruption and fraudulence. Let us also accept Swaraj’s claim that she was motivated only by humanitarianism and nothing else, though she could not have been unaware of LaMo’s close connection with her husband and daughter. This apart, even if her heart was bleeding for a particular Indian — still wanted by the Enforcement Directorate in the finance ministry of her own government — who needed to be with his wife in Portugal because the latter required cancer surgery there, Swaraj had perfectly proper and lawful options at her disposal. She could just ask the foreign secretary to direct the relevant medium-level officials to convey her wishes to the British authorities. Had she done so, her advisors would have told her that prior consultation with the finance ministry was necessary. This could have been completed speedily. Or, better still, she could have directed the Indian high commissioner in London to issue a temporary and short-term passport to LaMo, only for a visit to Portugal and back. The foreign secretary of that period, Sujatha Singh, is on record that this matter was never even mentioned to her.

In any case, Swaraj didn’t choose any of the acceptable options. What she did instead was not just highly improper, but shocking beyond words. Here was the foreign minister of India making what amounted to a purely personal phone call to the British high commissioner, who was on leave, requesting him to give travel documents to Lalit Modi. While doing so, she also took upon herself the responsibility of changing existing policy. The last communication to the British chancellor of the exchequer by P. Chidambaram, finance minister in UPA 2, had clearly stated that the grant of travel

papers to LaMo would “affect Britain’s relations with India”. Swaraj verbally assured the high commissioner that nothing of this kind would happen!

I have pounded the corridors of our foreign office since the early 1950s. I can vouch for the fact that no other foreign minister has behaved even remotely the way Swaraj has done. During the mid-1960s, when the US relaxed its strict visa policy and there was a deluge of Indian applications for an American visa, the government realised some applications would need official backing. Indira Gandhi issued strict instructions that “nobody above the rank of undersecretary” should speak to the US embassy about visas. Whatever mistakes Gandhi made later, she saw to it that the country’s honour was not compromised. Swaraj’s phone call to the British diplomat has demeaned not only her but also the entire country.

A diligent TV anchor has been arguing, plausibly enough, that Swaraj’s action even attracts Section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. But, despite veteran L.K. Advani’s sage advice, she has shown no sign of wanting to offer her resignation. Who can say what PM Modi would do — brazenly protect her or drop her under public pressure, when it is too late. His mystifying silence is more thundering than his all-too-frequent speeches confined to subjects he likes. Sometimes one sympathises with the BJP spokespersons, each of whom has to declare at least a hundred times a day: “PM does not have to speak on every subject.” Pray, on which of the highly polarising statements of the Hindutva hotheads among his followers and even colleagues has he spoken?

There is another powerful woman in the BJP, the chief minister of Rajasthan, Vasundhara Raje, also in the eye of storm.

But given my chosen theme, the less said about Raje the better.

The writer is a Delhi-based political commentator

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. a
    ak.dev
    Jul 6, 2015 at 10:51 pm
    PM is servant of India minus his enemies. PM regularly speaks on matters that concerns the needy Indians. PM need not speak or respond to propaa manufactured by his enemies. You are certainly not his follower. Keep on barking like a street d d o g.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. a
      ak.dev
      Jul 6, 2015 at 10:41 pm
      The author is suggesting that the right way of doing things is through secretaries and ambadors i.e. he is from the days when files were endlessly rotated among secretaries to avoid taking responsibilities by ministers. This was called red tapism which Modi wants to dismantle. He wants his ministers to be responsible for decision making and take prompt actions rather than endlessly depending on secretaries. Modi's style has not gone down well with people whose minds remained under developed during Congress rule.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. a
        ak.dev
        Jul 6, 2015 at 11:25 pm
        There is no wrong in Swaraj's behaviour. She did the right thing. What the author is saying is that she could had done the same thing through secretaries and got away with it i.e. the Congress way. Modi wants his ministers to take prompt decisions and be dependent of secretaries when required. there is no such legal requirement in this case. Swaraj was perfectly right to help Lalit Modi as there was no criminal case against him at that time. Jaitley's argument is valid as of today. There was no Jaitley in picture when Swaraj favoured Lalit Modi. You are combining two independent events occurred at two different times. Can you apply Jaitely sayings of today to the scams that happened in UPA time? Certainly not.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. A
          A n
          Jul 6, 2015 at 7:06 am
          The write up by veteran journalist is quite balanced one, amongst the w lot of noices heard in media in the last couple of days since the story broke out in public domain.i too strongly feel that it is high time for PM Modi to step in and speak out ,though,we understand that lot of high level,back door, meetings,churning has taken place.it is all the more needed when parliament is convened and all his tall and ambitious bills and policy initiatives gets down the drain on account of this and few other man made crisis from BJP ministers ,MP's and activists across the country.He must show decisiveness to handle Crisis clouding the horizon of the Govt.and the party,which unfortunately ,is unwarranted .All the Goodwill ,Mr.modi is enjoying ,despite ,erratic behaviour of party's activists,is on His personal charisma and he can ill afford to lose it so early.it takes few of these uneasy accidents which dent the image of the Govt.and once perception takes centre stage in the minds of the millions of supporter and silent citizen,then it is the beginning of the down fall .will he heed the wise counsel from the sane and independent VOICE?. Time will decide
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. D
            dmwn
            Jul 6, 2015 at 11:22 am
            The most we can do for these s is to give them power...... and helplessly keep watching them mock at us for giving them power. All that begging and recommending a case of a 'fugitive' of the nation by the foreign minister of that very nation, helping him frolic around the world (under the garb of medical emergency and a humanitarian response) has clearly re-defined the 'emerging India' in very poor light. Conversely, can one even just imagine a foreign minister of any nation personally recommending the case of a fugitive of his/her own land ? Unthinkable. Our foreign minister and this government has shamed India.
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. U
              Udainarayn Dvibedy
              Jul 6, 2015 at 10:57 pm
              Mr Inder Malhotra,In your obession you are not seeing the picture.MEA babus and all Indian embies were notoriously absent in helping Indians in distress.Sushma is doing her best to change this culture.The biggest challenge for India is to reform red tape preciously held by Babus.Sushma should be leen what she is and not what she is made out to be.Give some points for performance.
              (0)(0)
              Reply
              1. G
                Gopal
                Jul 6, 2015 at 5:44 am
                The Congress supporters are trying to dig dirt. They will dig a mountain and find a mouse!!! The Congress Party has no brains, no depth and no 'real' leader.
                (0)(0)
                Reply
                1. G
                  Gopal
                  Jul 6, 2015 at 8:51 am
                  What missteps? They are in your mind and in the mind of many media people. Shame on you all for going after her. You guys never chased the Congress ministers for crimes that were much much worse.
                  (0)(0)
                  Reply
                  1. V
                    Viti
                    Jul 6, 2015 at 6:02 pm
                    The author should watch Karan Thapar interview of Soli Sorabjee. Soli knows law better than the respected author. Again let PM chose when and what he should speak since Congress wants his explanation even when there is dirt on Delhi roads!.
                    (0)(0)
                    Reply
                    1. Load More Comments
                    Express Adda