Fifth column: Economic freedom at last?

To deliver on his promises of change and development, Modi will to have to first deliver on his assurance that there will be 'maximum governance and minimum government'.

Written by Tavleen Singh | Updated: May 25, 2014 6:23 am

You might find it hard to believe, but the most intelligent reason I have heard for Narendra Modi’s stunning victory comes from an illiterate, young woman who has spent her whole life on the pavements of Mumbai. Her name is Surekha and I have known her since she was a child and watched her struggle to survive under the economic jackboot of the Indian state. She sells flowers, her husband does odd jobs, and the authorities make every effort to prevent them from earning a meagre living.

The Indian welfare state provides them with no access to basic healthcare. So Surekha lost two sons and now fights hard to keep her three-year-old son alive. She so badly wants to have a roof over her head that she and her mother once travelled to Delhi to try and meet Sonia Gandhi. They had heard that Sonia was giving houses to the poor. Of this election she said, “We have always voted for the Congress and our lives have never improved. So this time, we are going to vote for Modi because they say he can bring change.”

The man who will be sworn in as India’s next prime minister tomorrow has himself said that this election has been about hope. But, this has escaped political pundits in India and abroad. Leftist pamphleteers, who fancy themselves as liberals, have been the noisiest in their prophecies of doom. But they have been abetted by an assortment of activists, secularists, self-appointed guardians of ‘Indian pluralism’ and Bollywood actors.

Since none of these worthies has experienced the economic jackboot under which someone like Surekha has to live, they bang on about social justice and their concerns that the poor will be forgotten under Narendra Modi. Were they remembered in the six decades of Congress rule? If they had been, why is every other Indian child malnourished and every other Indian family living on less than Rs 20 a day?

If there are 300 million Indians who are official members of the middle classes, it is because they have somehow managed to fight their way up despite the efforts of the Indian state to keep them down. In this the poor suffer more, but the rich suffer as much in different ways. If there are Indian corporations today that count among the biggest in the world, it is despite the efforts of the government of India to destroy them.

These efforts became more strenuous in the past decade. Businessmen have been subjected to bizarre changes of policy, tax raids and public vilification. But for Rahul Gandhi and Arvind Kejriwal, they have been the villains of the piece. During the election campaign, these two leaders rarely made a speech in which they did not charge Modi with promoting the ‘Ambani-Adani model of development’.

What they appear to not have noticed is that without private investment, and vast amounts of it, there is simply no possibility that India will be able to build the infrastructure she needs to catch up with even small, troubled Southeast Asian countries like Thailand. What worries me more is that they seem not to have noticed that what they are suggesting is that we put the economy back into the hands of officials and go back to the days when it was considered economic blasphemy to speak of private enterprise.

The truth is that the opposite needs to happen. If Modi wants to deliver on his promises of change and development, he is going to have to first deliver on his assurance that under him there will be “maximum governance and minimum government”. He could start by closing down the Planning Commission and half the ministries of the government. We do not need several ministries in charge, but one with total charge. For instance, of energy and transport. If he goes ahead with the administrative reforms Dr Manmohan Singh promised when he first became prime minister, he could find a hundred ways to hack through the layers and layers of red tape that have strangled economic growth and made it impossible for Indians like Surekha to escape the horrors of extreme poverty.

People like her need hope and change more than almost anyone else. And on my travels during this election campaign, I met people like her in nearly all the towns and villages I passed through. People with middleclass aspirations who are forced to live in poverty and squalour because the Indian state has been unable to provide them with jobs. And every time they have tried to lift their heads up, they have felt the economic jackboot slam down hard. So those who currently fear that under Modi there will be no concern for the poor and no thought for social justice, need to look around more carefully and see if these things ever existed.

Follow Tavleen Singh on Twitter @ tavleen_singh

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Ajay Kumar
    May 25, 2014 at 3:10 pm
    she is a journalist, not a charity worker. And Mr. apolitical, do not use words like "stupid". It is very uncivil to use it, especially a lady. I understand your rage and concern. Ask Ms. Singh for Surekha's address, go and meet her and help her out. That action will justify your concern, not calling someone stupid.
    Reply
  2. B
    Bhantunana
    May 25, 2014 at 1:18 am
    Tavleen deserves all the praise for reading the public mood much in advance of the election and like Rajat Sharma she has started supporting Modi as the future PM much in advance. She is the one who wrote a blistering and most factual article why the establishment in Delhi including opposition, does not want an Outsider Modi.
    Reply
  3. D
    drsarojkmishra
    May 25, 2014 at 12:00 am
    Excellent article. Thank You Tavleen.
    Reply
  4. K
    Kazuma
    May 26, 2014 at 3:26 am
    LOL!!! You need to grow some brains before spouting nonsense like India was always agricultural so it should stay in agricultural mode in the future also even though agriculture has hit the ceiling in how many people it can support and as income source for the people that are dependent on it. Every single developed country has gone through a phase where people moved out of agriculutre and into manufacturing things that brought with it more income and better standard of living. What India and Modi needs to do is get industries going especially labor intensive to absorb all the people coming out of agriculture and into more productive things like making cars and SUVs.
    Reply
  5. D
    Damaru Prasad
    May 26, 2014 at 2:27 am
    Advani should be retired on the promise that he will be the next president. He deserves it.
    Reply
  6. L
    lalit bagai
    May 25, 2014 at 12:49 pm
    they helped rober vadhra
    Reply
  7. L
    lalit bagai
    May 25, 2014 at 12:47 pm
    your own paper has supported the dynasty- and maligned modi.my posts are deleted- i only read your article, because we think alike
    Reply
  8. G
    Guru
    May 28, 2014 at 5:01 pm
    You can't compare Raga and Kejriwal with her. She is a private citizen and is enled to her opinion. You may not agree with her. What Raga and Kejriwal tried to do was to mislead the people of India with their lies. Indian voters are smarter than these two losers.
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments