Question from a future India

As the climate worsens, will it matter which country was originally to blame?

Written by Dean Spears | Published:December 5, 2015 12:32 am
cliamte change, paris climate change summit, india cliamte change summit, global warming, carbon emission, delhi pollution, air pollution, india news, environment news, latest news, indian express column Adults dressed as babies from Avaaz, a global civic organization that promotes activism on issues such as climate change, wear bibs with the messages, “Where are the Grown Ups?” at a protest the behaviour by negotiators at the World Climate Change Conference 2015 (COP21) at Le Bourget, near Paris, France, December 4, 2015. (Source: Reuters)

The world is watching the climate summit in Paris. Of course, not all Indians will be watching: Some of them are too young to know the threats they face from climate change. Over 8,00,000 babies will be born in India during the two weeks of international climate negotiations. Most of them will live long enough to experience climate change. But they will never have an opportunity at the polls to reward or punish today’s leaders for their success or failures in averting a climate disaster.

Yet, even these 8,00,000 are not the most disenfranchised or powerless Indians who will suffer the consequences of climate change. There will be about three million Indians who will someday be grandchildren of these 8,00,000 babies. Climate scientists tell us that it is in approximately the lifetime of these grandchildren that much of the pain of climate change will begin to register. Most of these grandchildren will live into the 22nd century, but they will be profoundly impacted by what today’s political leaders do. Scientifically plausible disaster scenarios are terrible: Much of South Asia could experience literally lethal temperature increases in which humans cannot survive outdoors for more than a few hours; Mumbai could be underwater; and society may not be able adjust to these changes peacefully.

Although the worst consequences of climate change will occur in the future, the very carbon emissions that will hurt future Indians are already taking a large toll on the health of Indians now being born. Delhi is widely recognised as the most polluted city on earth. A large fraction of the most polluted cities are right here in India, which is rapidly expanding its consumption of and pollution from coal, which fills the air with harmful smoke.

Burning coal is a uniquely dangerous contributor both to climate change in the future and to disease today. In ongoing joint research with Aashish Gupta, a demographer at the University of Pennsylvania, we find that Indian districts where new coal plants were opened between 2005 and 2012 saw a relative decrease in reported respiratory health. This makes sense because burning coal releases large amounts of pollutants into the air that can make everybody sick. Statistically, India can expect over 40,000 of the children born during the Paris talks to die before the 2019 election. Many of them will die of pneumonia and other respiratory infections. Reducing coal consumption would be a good place to start to avert climate change and prevent many of these deaths.

To be sure, today’s average Indian did not start the problem of carbon emissions. Most of the historical blame should fall on powerful people who have long known about climate change but have not opposed it: Mainly political and business leaders in richer countries. But India’s carbon footprint is changing quickly. If current trends continue, India’s annual carbon emissions will exceed those of the US in just a few years — quite possibly by 2024. Perhaps the only people truly blameless are the three million grandchildren not to be born for decades to come.

Most importantly, now is a time when action is more important than blame. India is like a pedestrian threatened by richer countries’ dangerous driving: By all means, the pedestrian should blame the irresponsible driver whose negligence almost kills her. But step out of the way of disaster first, rather than be flattened while vocalising objection.

It will not be easy to compel self-interested politicians in the US to take action on climate change. Yet, feasible strategies are available. Serious leadership from India and other countries may be able to form a coalition that incentivises the US to do something meaningful, perhaps by using trade penalties, as suggested by economist William Nordhaus. In all 40 scenarios that Nordhaus computed, India would be made economically better off by the formation of an international “climate club” that uses trade policy to enforce emissions reductions — precisely because the expected costs of climate change will be so large for India.

It is reasonable to suspect that future generations would not ask today’s leaders whether India was originally to blame for the disasters that they may be forced to endure. They may ask, instead, what today’s leaders did to stop the disaster.

The writer is visiting economist, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi, and Princeton University, US

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    atul
    Dec 5, 2015 at 4:58 am
    sir the per capita carbon emission in india is 1/10th of those in usa. the real need of change is in the consumption lifestyle of the west. american president bush had refused to ratify kyoto protocol to defend the american way of life. yes coal is a dirty fuel but it is the only hydrocarbon available to us. if the west wants to help it can help us in technology to make cleaner coal powered power plants, and newer tech in solar and wind energy but as bill gates said you still need energy when sun is not shining and wind is not blowing. denying us our rightful carbon space will be an injustice to the 300 million poor in india who look towards a better future.
    Reply
  2. B
    Bejoy
    Dec 6, 2015 at 4:40 pm
    Dear Spears, your article clearly looks like a one sided view to force India and other developing countries to stop using coal and effectively "stop developing". Is there any scientific proof that global warming is taking place ? if yes what are the contributors ? Where is the proof that it CO2 emission which is the reason ? How do you convince people of third world countries that the entire Climate Change Propaa is not like Nuclear NPT ? Developed Countries club should be an "exclusive club" and not more seats..
    Reply
  3. D
    Deepak A
    Dec 6, 2015 at 5:37 am
    India should quickly expand and operationalize its solar infrastructure, become a model for other mid laude countries, export them tech and equipments manufactured in India. For now, India can float solar bonds in international market to raise funds.
    Reply
  4. B
    brahmputra
    Dec 5, 2015 at 3:40 pm
    This w thing is to suffocate developing countries and make them miserable. Modi had gut to tell developed nations to take the responsibility. Developing nation can not use coal, can not use nuclear power and can not afford solar power. Solar power ie expensive in the sense that one need other source of energy to make solar cells, panels etc., take lot of land, and solar panels does not last long, it takes away trees from the road and generate lots of heat.
    Reply
  5. J
    Jayesh
    Dec 5, 2015 at 7:55 am
    I agree with your statement. But this author does not seem to worthy of calling "sir". We should be calling him Mr. Spears.
    Reply
  6. J
    Jayesh
    Dec 5, 2015 at 7:53 am
    I really wish the author reads my message - Firstly India is mindful of its duties towards climate change, author is blind to the fact that India has not ped crude price fall to customers to ensure investments in renewable energy remain viable and are not deferred. In addition that he should read DELP dashboard daily how much of carbon footprint is reduced on daily basis by installing LED bulbs. Here are some lop side statements by the author - "Some of them are too young to know the threats they face from climate change. " - how does their stand matter. There are enough old Indians to understand impact of climate change as well as understand poor require better life as well. Author seems to be too old to understand India has enough old people who think in the interest of humanity. "t will not be easy to compel self-interested politicians in the US to take action on climate change" - why should humanity should surrender to self interested politicians of any country. India is acting in self interest and is careful about impact and mindful of aspirations of millions who wish to live a developed lifestyle. This statement really tells us this author has surrendered to non-pragmatic, non-realistic, self-interested people on the earth .... world cannot live like this.
    Reply
  7. S
    Sundar Narasimhan
    Dec 5, 2015 at 2:26 pm
    Yes it matters! Because they seem to push it more with their activists, funds, conferences and what not! Not realizing they're having an unfair advantage after exploiting their own environment for centuries!
    Reply
  8. V
    Vinod Vinayak
    Dec 5, 2015 at 5:52 am
    it so easy to preach virtue. no westerner seems to practice it.
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments