Thursday, Oct 23, 2014

Can’t talk peace to the terrorist

Written by Khaled Ahmed | Posted: September 20, 2013 3:42 am

Pakistan’s offer of unconditional talks to the Taliban will only bring humiliation,and no peace.

An All Parties’ Conference (APC) in Islamabad on September 9,2013 unanimously recommended the initiation of dialogue with “all the stakeholders to curb terrorism”,meaning “white-flag” talks with the Taliban. Two APCs before this tried anti-Americanism to woo the terrorists,thinking the Taliban would be satisfied but failed,and also ended up doing nothing against America. After the army announced it was getting out of Swat-Malakand-Dir,the Taliban have killed a major general and a lieutenant colonel there,and killed four additional troops in North Waziristan,on September 15.

The army has already tried its populist anti-Americanism in deference to its internal emotion,but could not do without the $60 million a month it received from the US-led Coalition Support Fund for deployment in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA),while needlessly tormenting a government it thought was pro-America and pro-India.

The APC line was: fighting the Taliban was part of the big mistake of becoming America’s ally after 9/11. The rumour is that Imran Khan,whose party is ruling in strategic Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa abutting FATA,has convinced the army chief,General Ashfaq Kayani,to take the army out of FATA gradually as a gesture of sincerity to the Taliban who are fighting Pakistan because of its slavishly pro-America policy.

The APC attached no conditions to the offer of talks,except for self-mortifyingly vowing to go to the UN against American drones killing the Taliban in FATA; and now the Taliban are busy conferring among their 78 splinters to decide how to respond to the offer after the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) welcomed it through a spokesman. On September 15,they proclaimed freeing of TTP prisoners as their precondition for talks. Pakistan’s politics of surrender will likely bring humiliation and no peace.

In Urdu,the APC has been hailed as supreme wisdom; in English,serious doubts have arisen about talking to terrorists from a position of weakness. A clash of linguistic narratives took place pointedly on a GEO TV talk show last week where “English-medium” former Pakistan ambassador to the US and head of Islamabad NGO Jinnah Institute,Sherry Rehman,was pitted against the “Urdu-medium”,recently “outed” super-non-state actor,former chief of “defunct” Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and front-row member of the Defence of Pakistan Council vowing to fight India till the bitter end,Fazlur Rehman Khalil. Unfortunately,Sherry Rehman appeared to lose the debate on language competence,but what she said was right.

As for the charge that Pakistan was getting ready to talk to the Taliban from prostration,Khalil’s answer was stock: if the superpower can talk peace with the Taliban “strangers”,why can’t Pakistan with its own “misguided sons”? Rehman’s rebuttal was easy: the Americans are leaving a country they had occupied; Pakistan was not leaving Pakistan. Then came a more complicated issue: if Pakistan can be ready to talk to the Baloch insurgents doing terrorism in Balochistan,why can’t it talk to the Taliban? Rehman said: because the Taliban have come from outside,while the Baloch are Pakistanis. She carefully suppressed the comment that while both were terrorists,the Taliban had to be fought because they were ideologically more threatening.

The Taliban and continued…

  Previous Story
Siren on Reboot
Next Story  
Creating
comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,293 other followers