In Tokyo this week, Modi framed an interesting antinomy in Asia.
On the verdict, an editorial says this “marks a significant trend of reversal from the patterns seen in the general elections ."
...Germany is affected too. That’s why its decision to pitch in with military and humanitarian support in the fight against the IS.
Incumbents in the state have an advantage. But it is difficult to use the results to cull out statewide or nationwide trends.
The first month of great expectations is over. But no magic is possible in such a short period of time. The treasury is scraping the bottom of the barrel, and reviving growth calls for herculean efforts to put the economy back on the rails. Meanwhile, fears of an impending failure of the monsoon have spiked inflation, which is at a five-month high. In such a situation, the government should undertake path-breaking reform of the economy. But tinkering is what it seems to have begun with.
In the face of the mounting cane payment arrears of sugar mills (to the tune of Rs 11,000 crore), import duties have been raised nearly three-fold, from 15 to 40 per cent. To add to this, the existing sugar export subsidy of Rs 3,300 per tonne has been extended, and additional subsidised loans of Rs 4,400 crore are being offered to the mills. This is an expensive arrangement designed to enable mills to pay the arrears. But this arrangement does nothing to address the core issue — mills cannot function sustainably unless sugarcane prices, which are state controlled, are aligned with the price of sugar. Further, the increase in the import duty could also encourage inflation. Already the prices of sugar have gone up.
When there are already heavy import duties on all manner of agricultural, horticultural and dairy products, further protection seems like a bad idea. To protect consumer interests, the government must now do all that it can to keep retail prices in check. But with several state governments not allied to the NDA, a coordinated plan to check hoarding and price rise will not be easy.
What, then, should be done? As far as wheat and rice are concerned, the FCI buys up about 600 lakh tonnes (a third of our annual output) each year, and off-loads (via the PDS) about 500 lakh tonnes. Not only does the FCI buy up a large amount of the marketable surplus, in the process, it squeezes out the open market. By adding such large quantities to its already overstocked inventory, the FCI itself has become an anti-consumer hoarder. Releasing at least 20 lakh tonnes from the FCI’s surplus stocks is called for urgently. Such a measure will not only reduce food prices, it will also create capital (a whopping Rs 2,000 crore) for a job-creating infrastructure push.
The key to success in an evolving 21st-century economy is effective retail marketing that supplements food production. In the last two decades, food grain output has increased 50 per cent and horticultural output 100 per cent. But marketing hasn’t kept pace. In spite of their imperfections, the FCI and PDS have managed to ensure that wheat and rice are available to all. continued…