Inside track: Shahanshah

Amit Shah runs a one-man show in which there is little room for debate or consensus.

Written by Coomi Kapoor | Published:March 12, 2017 12:50 am
Amit shah, BJP, BJp president Amit shah, Uttar pradesh, uttarakhand, BJP, BJP victory, BJP win, Varanasi, UP elections 2017, Up polls, Uttarakhand elections 2017, Shahenshah, rahul gandhi, elections results, BJP, Akhilesh yadav, congress, SP, bsp, mayawati, mamata Banerjee, Rajnath singh, sonia gandhi, india news, indian express news BJP President Amit Shah. (Source: AP Photo)

Amit Shah exerts more influence in the party than any past president, including loh purush L K Advani in his hey day. Shah runs a one-man show in which there is little room for debate or consensus. Some time back a visitor to the BJP office on Ashoka Road was taken aback to find that all BJP office-bearers present in the building were at pains to rush to the gate to receive Shah when he arrived. No other president was given such a ceremonial reception. A major English TV channel which displayed the exit poll results and the actual seat tallies, used Shah’s photo to represent the BJP along with pictures of Akhilesh Yadav, Rahul and Mayawati, as leaders of their respective parties. Prime Minister Modi is unlikely to be amused by this. Shah may be a master strategist but it is Modi’s magic which got the seats in Uttar Pradesh.

Saraswati, no help

Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee was not the first one to propose that the Samajwadi Party, Congress and BSP should form an alliance in UP to keep the BJP out. Sensing defeat much earlier, pollster Prashant Kishor had talked privately of a Ganga, Yamuna, Saraswati alliance. The last being a reference to the BSP which he felt could turn out to be an invisible ally. Clearly not given much importance by Akhilesh Yadav during the UP campaign, the Congress whiz-kid pollster grumbled that the UP Chief Minister had not played his cards well. Of course when the results were out, the Congress realised that even merging with Saraswati would have been of little use.

Left out

Rajnath Singh took a break from the UP election campaign to visit the Northeast last month. His party men were surprised to find that Singh did not make many phone calls to UP to get a feedback on the trends of polling in the third phase of elections, nor did he receive many calls from the state where election fever was at its peak. Singh told a visitor that he isn’t involved in micro-management of the election. As the tallest leader from UP in the Union Cabinet, it was expected that his party would ask Singh if he was interested in being the chief ministerial candidate, but the Home Minister was not consulted or sounded. Singh is not a favourite of Shah, particularly after his remark that it was unfortunate that the BJP had not fielded a single Muslim candidate in UP.

No bridging gap

Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s political secretary Ahmed Patel has reason to be furious. It was during the Manmohan Singh regime, thanks to Patel’s persistent efforts, that the UPA government had cleared a project for a four-lane cable bridge over the Narmada river near his hometown Bharuch to facilitate traffic on the highway. However, at the inaugural function last week, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi presiding, Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari tried to steal the credit claiming that he had terminated the earlier contract to build the bridge due to non-performance, and issued a fresh tender at a lower price, and that construction of the bridge started on March 3, 2015, during his tenure. Patel sent a clarification pointing out that the work on the bridge started in March 2014 and that the then minister C P Joshi had inaugurated the bridge along with former Gujarat CM Anandiben Patel. He submitted all the necessary documents to prove his point that the tender for the bridge contract on an EPC (engineering, procurement, construction) basis was awarded to L&T in 2013. Gadkari waffled, responding that he would get the matter examined. In a further slight, Patel, the man whom the people of Bharuch and Ankleshwar too recognise as the driving force behind the project, was verbally invited by the district collector only a day before the inauguration.

Thakur-centric

After the UP results, the Congress should learn a lesson or two from the BJP in getting its caste equations right in Madhya Pradesh rather than allowing only Thakurs to dominate. Recently, Ajay Singh, son of the late Arjun Singh, was appointed Congress leader in the Assembly, following the death of Satyadev Katare. Singh is a Thakur, as are the four other Congress MLAs in the front bench of the Assembly — Rajendra Singh, Govind Singh, Mahendra Singh Kalukheda and K P Singh. OBCs, SCs and tribals account for nearly 80 per cent of the state’s population. The BJP, keeping this in mind, ensured that its last three CMs in the state, namely Uma Bharti, Babulal Gaur and Shivraj Singh Chouhan, were OBCs.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. D
    Devu
    Mar 12, 2017 at 12:09 pm
    Successive dynasty politics has created a culture of sychophancy across every spectrum in India. Unfit and mediocres are occupying all insutions especially in the media. lt;br/gt;This useless article and its writer are the testimony to the fact.
    Reply
    1. P
      PPrasad78
      Mar 12, 2017 at 6:09 am
      To do a great job you have to employ and empower the right person and that is exactly what Modi did with Amit Shah, who is a Master Strategist in winning elections in states like UP where the electoral arithmetic is very complex.lt;br/gt;If Amit Shah is receiving accolades - so be it , he deserves it ! The author has no problems when the his receive "manufactured" accolades even when they do a disastrous job.
      Reply
      1. A
        Against Sick
        Mar 12, 2017 at 8:08 am
        This is the same "journalist" who had written-false-story-against-Sushma-Swaraj and got severely beaten up-as-Sushmaji exposed her-lies. Another-sickular-fraudster-IGNORE.
        Reply
        1. H
          Harish Kumar
          Mar 12, 2017 at 9:18 am
          I am afraid all political parties are one man show. There is no democracy. Since there is no democracy within the parties, how we can expect good governance from any political party in India. India runs on "RAM BHAROSE"
          Reply
          1. H
            harshad
            Mar 12, 2017 at 10:07 am
            If Mayawati was part of SP-BSP alliance then results would have been different. I think you have overlooked vote %. SP -23% , Mayawati- 22% and Congress- 6% . Summation might be reached up to 50% which would be more than BJP vote share. (BJP has got 39%.). In big state like UP, it matter most.
            Reply
            1. M
              Murthy
              Mar 13, 2017 at 12:40 am
              Just add up the vote share.... if so, the work of psephologists must be very, very easy....Once elected the three parties, should I say, the three dynasties will work together very well, you think ?
              Reply
              1. M
                Murthy
                Mar 13, 2017 at 12:37 am
                This is "Let us chat, while waiting for the bus" !!! Coomi Kapoor, you have not see the reception that President of the Congress Party gets?.... as compared to ManMohan Singh?? How do you know, there are no discussions in the BjP and that Amit Shah is "a one man show"?? Have you attended their meetings??
                Reply
                1. M
                  Murthy
                  Mar 13, 2017 at 12:42 am
                  Yah, consider becoming a Sanyasi, why put up with this imperfect India ..?
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments