A self-goal by the RSS

The Akhand Bharat controversy exposes the Sangh’s ideological dogmas and difficulties.

Written by Sudheendra Kulkarni | Published:January 6, 2016 1:01 am
Ram Madhav, Akhand Bharat, PM Narendra Modi, RSS, Narendra Modi govt, BJP, India, Pakistan, express column, Ram Madhav, BJP National General Secretary. (Express photo by Ravi Kanojia)

Two things are taboo in the RSS and the BJP. The RSS never admits there’s anything flawed or outdated in its ideology. The BJP, which has allowed itself to be ideologically captured and organisationally controlled by the RSS, never publicly challenges the parent organisation’s core beliefs. However, reality does not respect any organisation’s imagined infallibility. Those who have tried to dictate the world to follow their own dogma have fallen by the wayside. History accommodates, even applauds, those who change with the times. But changing with the times demands honest self-criticism in the public realm. This spirit is in short supply in the RSS and BJP.

The RSS has always claimed that “Hindu Rashtra” and “Akhand Bharat” (the two are inter-related) are its core beliefs, which will not change even if the organisation changes some of its external features. However, at the very first brush with the recently changed reality in the India-Pakistan engagement, following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s bold visit to Lahore, one of its ideological pillars, Akhand Bharat, has developed embarrassingly huge cracks. These cracks are vainly sought to be covered up with weak explanations and confounding clarifications.

Look how hurriedly the BJP, through its spokesman M.J. Akbar, officially distanced itself from the “Akhand Bharat” remarks of its own national general secretary, Ram Madhav, made in the course of his interview with Al Jazeera. Akbar is capable of penning an entire book to demolish the RSS’s view of “Akhand Bharat”. However, he didn’t even vaguely criticise it. Madhav, a well-known RSS pracharak himself, has tried to wriggle out of the self-created controversy by writing a clarificatory article in this newspaper (‘A people’s idea’, December 29).

Madhav’s self-defence is ineffective. Take, for example, his claim: “Let me reiterate that the Akhand Bharat doctrine is a cultural and people-centric idea. I was not even remotely suggesting that we should redraw the boundaries of our countries.” Now, watch his interview. He was indeed suggesting a redrawing of the boundaries of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. He asked his interviewer, Mehdi Hasan, “If two Germanys can come together, if two Vietnams can come together, what makes you think that India and Pakistan cannot come together?” Madhav surely knows West and East Germany, as also South and North Vietnam, redrew their boundaries when they reunified. Their reunification was a political process, in which the two divided parts lost their sovereignty and separate identities when they became “Akhand Germany” and “Akhand Vietnam”. By using this analogy, Madhav was clearly hinting that Akhand Bharat, in the RSS’s conception, means the political reunion of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

This is what the RSS has always stated: That the Partition of India in 1947 was wrong and unacceptable, and that this wrong would somehow be corrected in future. Madhav candidly describes this as “the generational vision of the RSS”. He even shows his hurt feelings by indirectly questioning his critics within the RSS why his remarks on Akhand Bharat “became an issue” now, when the same thing was “stated and restated several times before by several people in the Parivar”.

To his credit, Madhav made many good points in the interview by giving a more inclusive and tolerant interpretation to the policies and actions of the Modi government. He’s also right in stating that the coming together of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh would not be “through armies or aggression, but through popular goodwill”. Indeed, all should welcome “a people’s reunion at the cultural and societal level” in our subcontinent, which has suffered immensely on account of the artificial walls of separation erected by our governments. But will Madhav admit that his praiseworthy statement strikes a blow at the other foundational pillar of RSS ideology — Hindu rashtra? Both before and after Partition, the RSS insisted that Bharat, “Akhand” or “Khandit”, is a Hindu nation. Madhav and other RSS-BJP leaders should explain how they can ever create goodwill among the Muslims of Pakistan and Bangladesh — not to speak of the Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists in India — by propagating that today’s Bharat is, and tomorrow’s Akhand Bharat (even in a confederal form, without redrawing boundaries) will be, a Hindu rashtra.

When confronted with this argument, RSS leaders predictably claim its critics don’t understand the real meaning of the word “Hindu”, and that it’s a cultural, and not a religious, concept. They are free to delude themselves. But this, too, is unacceptable to non-Hindus and also to a majority of Hindus. Besides, to equate Indian culture with Hindu culture is to disrespect Article 51 A of the Constitution, which requires us to “value and preserve our composite culture”.

Here’s the supreme paradox: Most RSS-BJP supporters themselves understand “Hindu” only in its religious connotation. Many of them reject the call for Akhand Bharat by saying, often in bigoted ways, that the coming together of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh would reduce the proportion of the Hindu population and increase that of Muslims.

If the RSS genuinely desired the com-ing together of the peoples of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, it had better discard both the Akhand Bharat and Hindu rashtra shibboleths.

 

The writer was an aide to former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpaye.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Sirius
    Jan 6, 2016 at 12:59 pm
    Mr. Kulkarni should first review what his recent outreach to Mr. Kasuri and stan has achieved for India , which is nought . So, he will claim it has brought the people of subcontinent closer. Is he not then working , albeit surrepiously , for a cultural "Akhand Bharat" ? Then he must be asked that what were his reactions to Mr. Aiyar's infamous comment (" inhe hataiye Hume laiye"), because he was present as a panelist in that TV program. If he agrees, is he not alluding to a political union of the countries, as it amounts to one taking over the other ? Now correct me if I understand this as a unsavoury version of political "Akhand Bharat", with Mr. Aiyar as Mir Jafar ? With these, I am beginning to appreciate what Shiv Sena activists did to him ...
    Reply
    1. H
      Haradhan Mandal
      Jan 6, 2016 at 5:22 pm
      TEST -- Bjp has no idea why was it voted to power?It was voted because Congress was corrupt and there was general break down of effective governing.Period.Now BJP has concluded India is ungovernable and it really can not do much better,not withstanding honest hard working Modi.It is cristal clear.It was not that Congress is corrupt and its leadership is ruddarlessdia is very corrupt,not land,its people,they are too many,no concept of law and order or working insution,case in point with all talk of NSA and tall talk,the terrorist easily penetrated Patancot,commandeering a SP car with blue beacon,and killed more security people than the 6 they lost.and 3 days.How smart you have to be to check out a dead terrorist who is wearing suicide Bomb.Do yo need to be rocket scientist to get close to get blown up?That is for you,real India.Why would a SP go to border at 2.30 a.m,when you are a Sikh,to visit another Faith,worship site?No one USa or FBI buy this fairy tale?But in India'SAB CHALTHA HAY' BJP or Congress does not matter.I rest my case.H.Mani,USa,with no Malice.
      Reply
      1. H
        Haradhan Mandal
        Jan 6, 2016 at 5:04 pm
        TEST 1 2 3 1 2 3 (to see, if I am blocked)!
        Reply
        1. M
          Madam
          Jan 6, 2016 at 1:44 pm
          Possibility of U S S A. United States of south asia. Should be tried.
          Reply
          1. S
            Sajesh Kumar
            Jan 6, 2016 at 7:42 pm
            You have to think how to reduce muslim potion in India. Other wise more Pak and Bangla will be made with the help of Congress and Communist.
            Reply
            1. K
              K SHESHU
              Jan 6, 2016 at 7:36 am
              History has left us problem as K.R. Narayanan expressed rightly. Now we have to move forward. We can do it only if we accept the reality. But harping on what would have happened is of no use.
              Reply
              1. A
                Ajay Sunder
                Jan 6, 2016 at 11:56 am
                Excellent article!Thank you.Please do not worry if you don't get appreciation for the article. Let me tell you that you represent me and a number of my friends and others who have the same view as you and me.What you have told us is not known to many .Time for RSS to decide whether they would allow Mr.Modi to do something for which he has got the mandate and for which even people who may not necessarily like him would support him or the RSS would keep sticking to its hidden agenda and keep offering Gajendra Chauhans.
                Reply
                1. A
                  Arun
                  Jan 6, 2016 at 8:26 am
                  Hinduism is a philosophy. A way of life. The doctrine of which allows me the choice of acceptance or rejection. Rama or Ganpati or atheism too. The Upanishads or Gita or tantra or mantra. Hindutva, on the other hand, is a militant imposition of wrongly interpreted tenets of Hinduism. Hindutva is a political tool -- nothing to do with the religion itself. When Hinduism is a philosophy, Hindu Rashtra Akhand Bharat is nothing but nonsense.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments