A Crisis Of Male Identity

Communal and gender violence in India points to the same backlash.

Written by Satyam Viswanathan | Published:July 13, 2017 12:20 am
dimapur, dimapur protest, dimpaur lynching, rape lynching, rape lynch mob Representational Image. (file)

India will ring in its 70th anniversary of independence as a modern nation-state that frequently makes global news for medieval lynchings and a rape culture. Violence perpetrated by men unable to reconcile with the gradual upturning of a patriarchal status quo, unable to adapt to new demands being made on masculine identity, is threatening the assumption of stability on which our vast and wonderfully heterogeneous country rests. Identity can be divided into two broad categories: “Achieved” identity derived from individual endeavours (education, work and so on), and “ascribed” identity that is derived from intrinsic characteristics (religion, ethnicity, gender etc.).

The achieved identity of the Indian male is under attack today, in a hyper-competitive country where aspirations are sky-high but economic growth is sluggish and imbalanced. As employment growth slows to a crawl and access to quality education remains the preserve of a tiny sliver, self-esteem and emotional security are more likely to be found in his ascribed identities.

Meanwhile, as women and historically subjugated communities have (just about) started to gain a toehold into the mainstream through affirmative action and political representation, male anxiety has been further exacerbated. Faced with increased competition and impossible odds in the job market, their ticket to an achieved identity based on work and material markers is severely threatened. The sense of letdown is heightened by the contrast between the promised abundance of a new era of growth and their harsh lived realities. The increase in violence against women and minorities, rampant moral policing, and attempts to criminalise alternate sexualities are all part of a backlash against perceived threats to male supremacy.

In this environment, speaking to ascribed identity is a winning formula for any political party. Hindu male privilege is vastly under-appreciated by its main beneficiaries. It is the privilege of having, by virtue of a majority share of the population, one’s customs, appearances and lifestyle choices as the default norm. It is the privilege of not being defined as the “other”. For debatable historical reasons (rooted in perceived emasculation by Mughals and the British), the modern Indian nation-state inherited a dangerous privileged Hindu male psychology of victimhood. Atal Bihari Vajpayee referred to it as the mindset of “a majority community with a minority complex”.

By speaking with a forked tongue about vikas and Hindutva at the same time, our ruling party ensures it finds resonance with India’s male population (through their frustrated aspirations). When achieved identity is not being validated, ascribed identity is the panacea. The cow protection narrative being pushed today is part of a larger attempt to restore the supposedly lost glory of a muscular Hindu India. In tandem with the deliberate conflation of nationalistic sentiment with unquestioned support for the ruling party, these narratives serve to legitimise Hindu male control of the levers of power. The cold math and ends-justify-means logic of democratic elections enables such targeting of minorities.

Republicans in America realised more than 50 years ago that when a population (black Americans) has representation in the low teens, there is no need to appease them. The Southern Strategy designed to target and alienate minorities ensued and its consequences can be felt until today. Despite the election of a black president in 2008, Donald Trump came to power on the back of anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim stances, and endorsement by the Ku Klux Klan. The challenges of racism continue to bedevil America despite tremendous social progress in the last half century.

A similar strategy has being acted upon in India since 2014. Unlike America which saw 40 years of continuous economic growth between the death of Martin Luther King Jr. and the election of Barack Obama, India operates from a context of mass poverty and huge institutional obstacles to consistent growth. The lure of ascribed identity, of targeting the “other” will not diminish in our context, unless purposefully countered.

The writer is a consumer researcher

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    Reclaim kapali
    Jul 14, 2017 at 3:18 am
    Whatever stopped the rulers - Mughals, British or CongiCommies, to make achievement possible for all? When they didn't do so, why rant against people prioritizing their ascribed iden y? Just a bunch of fancy terms to disguise the venal inep ude of yesteryears and to malign/ascribe maleficence to the present narrative. Boring.
    Reply
    1. M
      mark
      Jul 14, 2017 at 2:53 am
      "A similar strategy has being acted upon in India since 2014" means of course Modi is Thrump or Thrump is Modi . Simply, this has nothing to, since we talk of so different countries and situations (starting with the point about "minorities": Black Americans are the descendants of imported slaves and Islam came in India as an invader hostile to "idolatric" religions, Shaivism, Vishnuism, Buddhism, Jainism and sent millions of In dians to death and slavery) . If there are illiterate paid bhakts, there are also paid "liberals" journos who are not much more educated or not able to think properly, or simply see and describe reality. Like: "ins utional obstacles to consistent growth", what is India rate of growth today? Highest in the world. As for "40 years of continuous economic growth" in the US, forgotten the Wall Street crash and how many Americans live actually on subsidies. Certainly some ppl want to see India fail coming out of socialist misery.
      Reply
      1. S
        Sudheer Thaakur
        Jul 14, 2017 at 1:21 am
        hindus do not target others. but are very adept at self flagellation and living down in their own esteem as this piece proves.
        Reply
        1. D
          Deeptanshu Verma
          Jul 14, 2017 at 5:20 am
          Correct
          Reply
        2. C
          chitta
          Jul 14, 2017 at 12:01 am
          Hindus are afraid of growing Muslim ppulation and Muslims power. Hindus know that if Muslims gain majority than Muslim will throw them out. So Hindu are jumping here and there.
          Reply
          1. A
            ashi cool
            Jul 13, 2017 at 11:50 pm
            Liberal morons like these have ruined the country with sickularism and Muslim as slicking
            Reply
            1. C
              chandra
              Jul 13, 2017 at 10:28 pm
              We Hindu community will never make any introspection.We are not concerned about trafficking of children,malnutrician,child pros ution,dowry deaths etc but we are very careful about the food habits of other people.If nothing is going to the stomach do not worry. But if something is going then search what is it? Are we really a perverted set of world humanity in 21st century?
              Reply
              1. S
                siva
                Jul 13, 2017 at 11:03 pm
                Yes, ofcourse.We will be showing only our intellectual capabilities, ne'er bother about West Bengal going out of control due to appea t of not minorities but fanatical elements of minorities. We will not bother about thousands of Hindus driven out of Kashmir but we will make a hue and cry of somebody lynched due to even personal feud!!!
                Reply
                1. M
                  mark
                  Jul 13, 2017 at 11:26 pm
                  And again, are "medieval lynchings and a rape culture" happening in India only from Hindus? not only Hindus "are very careful about the food habits of other people". Try pork-feast in Riyad. Or near Delhi's Jama Masjid. Excesses are not from one side only.
                2. S
                  Suren Singh Sahni
                  Jul 14, 2017 at 4:07 am
                  Absolutely true.One of the best comments.
                  Reply
                  1. S
                    Suren Singh Sahni
                    Jul 14, 2017 at 4:10 am
                    Great
                    Reply
                  2. M
                    mark
                    Jul 13, 2017 at 9:01 pm
                    "modern nation-state that frequently makes global news for medieval lynchings and a rape culture." and Bofors, and Lalu, and Robert Viagra, forgot these? and Mumbai Taj? Plus, if we try to understand most of political scientists, the Republic of India is somehow still on the way to become a nation-state, and if we read this piece, the author is obviouly against nation-states, anyway. The author is a "democrat" that denies openly to the majority the right to rule, since the majority's opinions are not pleasant to his sophisticaded brain (and possibly to some vested interests). So, only self-proclaimed "elites" should rule? As for the "black president", this is a bit of a joke (or, better, a PR stunt), Ovama is not an Afro-American descendant of slaves and had a close relationship with the banking lobbies.
                    Reply
                    1. M
                      mark
                      Jul 13, 2017 at 10:31 pm
                      Oh, and about "medieval lynchings" what about anti-Sikh riots? and the recent lynching of a police officer in Kashmir, and so on, I doubt the author was thinking about them. Gaurakshas are certainly part of the goondaraj that India had become, but certainly didn't invent it ... CPI has a long history of political violence, and so on ... as for the "context of mass poverty", who ruled India post-1947? secular, inclusive, Nehruvian socialism who, among other misdeeeds, possibly reinforced caste barriers
                      Reply
                    2. M
                      mark
                      Jul 13, 2017 at 8:35 pm
                      The author (who is he but an Indian male, anyway?) writes lots of stupid (even if politically correct) things, notably regarding Reps in the US, 50 years back, George Wallace, favoring segregation was a Democrat, not a Rep. The rest if of the same quality. The most funny thing is about women, as there are certainly no rapes in a certain community, where the status of women is specially high. Always the same mental defect, that in a democracy, the majority must follow the whims of minorities. Respect minority, certainly, but certainly not the majority to obey to minority.
                      Reply
                      1. Load More Comments