Dear PM, India needs police reform

The thana, the first line of defence against terror, remains in a dismal state

Written by Prakash Singh | Published:November 26, 2016 12:14 am
26/11, 26/11 attack, india police, police reform, india police reform, india news, india police efficiency, terror combating india, india news It is high time that the government seriously consider bringing police/public order in the Concurrent List of the Constitution. (File/Express Photo)

Are we prepared to face another 26/11-like strike? During the last eight years, since the devastating attack in Mumbai, some measures have no doubt been taken to strengthen the counter-terror architecture of the state, but much remains to be done. At the grassroots level, the inherent weaknesses of the state police remain. The thana police, which is the first responder to a terrorist act, continues to be in a dismal state.

While addressing the directors general of police in Guwahati on November 30, 2014, you enunciated the concept of SMART Police — police which would be strict and sensitive, modern and mobile, alert and accountable, reliable and responsible, tech-savvy and trained. It was a unique definition and we all looked forward to a transformational change. Two years down the line there is a sense of disappointment because the change has not happened. This is, however, not to find fault with the Central government. We all know that police is a state subject and that the decline is essentially because the state political leadership is not prepared to relax its stranglehold over the police.

The Supreme Court’s directions on police reforms have not been complied with in letter and spirit by any state. Seventeen states have enacted laws to legitimise the status quo and circumvent the implementation of the Court’s directions. The remaining states have passed executive orders which dilute or amend the SC’s directions. No wonder the Justice Thomas committee, which was set up to monitor the implementation of the Court’s directions, expressed a sense of “dismay” over the indifference to judicial directions.

The Central government is not entirely above blame. In 2006, when the SC gave its landmark judgment on police reforms, it was expected that the Government of India would enact the Model Police Act which had been drafted by a committee headed by Soli Sorabjee. The states would possibly have followed the Centre’s example. Besides, Article 252 of the Constitution gives Parliament the power to legislate for two or more states by consent. It states that such an Act shall apply to the consenting states and to any other states by which it is adopted through a resolution passed by the legislatures of those states. Nothing of the kind was even attempted by the previous government. As a result, we are confronted with an anomalous situation. The British had one Police Act for the entire country while we have different Acts for different states.

It is high time that the government seriously consider bringing police/public order in the Concurrent List of the Constitution. All state governments depend on the Centre to maintain law and order. An amendment to the Constitution would give de jure status to what is already de facto on the ground. Fali Nariman, a leading constitutional expert, has strongly argued for such an amendment. If the amendment is not found feasible, the least the government should do is declare certain crimes as “federal” and entrust their investigation to a Central agency. This would be in keeping with the recommendations of the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.

There are a range of other measures which could be undertaken without any significant opposition. There are huge manpower deficiencies — we are short of about half a million policemen nationwide. Why can’t these vacancies be filled up and provide employment to many? Police transport needs an upgrade. There are police stations in the country — and this may come as a surprise to you — which have neither a telephone nor wireless. Forensic facilities are hopelessly inadequate in all the states — except Gujarat, which not only has a state forensic laboratory, but also regional, district and mobile laboratories. The Gujarat model in forensics needs to be replicated in other states.

Housing has a direct impact on the welfare and morale of police personnel. There are instances of policemen living in sub-human conditions. The National Police Commission had recommended family accommodation for all the gazetted and non-gazetted personnel. According to the BPR&D, as on January 1, 2015, only 5.80 lakh family quarters were available for over 17.21 lakh police personnel. Working hours of policemen need to be regulated. Empirical studies have shown that subordinate police officers work 10-16 hours a day, round the week. This causes stress and leads to multiple complications including rude behaviour with the public and domestic unhappiness.

Separation of investigation from law and order is the least controversial direction of the SC. This could be implemented right away. Some states have already initiated the process. In fact, it would be ideal to hold a conference of the chief ministers, chief secretaries/home secretaries and DGPs of all the states to discuss the entire gamut of police reforms to enhance the capabilities of the police to meet the challenges of the future.

These challenges are going to be very serious. Terrorist threats to the security of the state will be most formidable. Cyber-crimes will pose a serious threat. Maoist insurgency, militancy in the Northeast and separatist elements in J&K are already there. The overall internal security scenario is going to be grim and is best summed up in the Sanskrit verse Agnina dahyamanastu shatrumadhye gato rane (when there is fire all around and you are surrounded by enemies on the battlefield). The security architecture of the country requires a lot more reinforcement and strengthening.

One last point: Good internal security is essential to sustain the momentum of economic progress and provides the foundation for success and prestige in external relations. US national security doctrine acknowledges this basic principle. We seem to have ignored it so far. It is still not too late to rectify this mistake.

We have, sir, great expectations from you. May God give you the strength to push through reforms in the different spheres.

The writer, who retired as DG BSF, has been campaigning for police reforms for over two decades

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

  1. O
    Onkar Singh
    Nov 26, 2016 at 8:03 am
    Shri Prakash Singh a honest and a brilliant police officer of his stature was asked to prepare what had gone a miss during the jat agitation in Haryana in February this year.When he was preparing his second report,the Haryana govt withdrew his job of commissioning the second report.Mind the govt of Haryana,is that of those who call themselves Deshbhakts,but when shown the mirror they don't like to see their own dirty faces(actions or lapses).The DGP is talking sense but will the politicians listen to him? that is the million dollar question!
    Reply
    1. K
      K SHESHU
      Nov 26, 2016 at 2:27 pm
      Reforms should start from top br who feel they can do anything with great impunity
      Reply
      1. A
        ashok s
        Nov 26, 2016 at 10:10 am
        I won't go in much what author has referred .but as I stay in Mira road I have seen police man working for scoundrel s . in each and every form supporting them. In logistics of supplying drugs, girls and latest being transportation of black money. I can give the names involved are Ner sondhe, nissar, Jayant sinha, khan is working in and around the area. No wonder i f one day the area went catastrophic event . worst then Gujarat or Sikh riots
        Reply
        1. D
          Dash
          Nov 26, 2016 at 5:39 pm
          Prakash Singh vs Union of India case is a watershed moment in Indian politics. Sadly,States have ignored this. Modi ji can only goad States into action as policing comes under State list.
          Reply
          1. K
            Kaliyug
            Nov 26, 2016 at 8:20 pm
            The biggest problem is the recruitment of talent for the Police which is highly penetrated by caste, political patronage and bribery. From the day one the policeman thinks he is above the law and is the law. Indian police is used by politicians for political bashing, not for real law and order. Every city in India should have an Elite force that can be mobilized within an hour, so that they are able to fight back. Indian police has one motivation and that is bribes.
            Reply
            1. C
              Col S
              Nov 26, 2016 at 2:42 am
              By ENFORCING PRIORITY for VIP Security over Public,POLICE has lost its DIGNITY, PRIDE of Profession and RESPECT. It neither EVOKES AWE nor RESPECT. Worst is the DAILY NEWS of POLICE OFFICIAL being BEATEN or KILLED.Scarce SECURITY RESOURCES ABUSED-- SAFE VIP and INSECURE nation and Public. Not one INDIA but DIGITALLY DIVIDED.Withdraw VIP Security. Let ALL be on SAME PAGE.
              Reply
              1. S
                Sriniwasan
                Nov 26, 2016 at 4:03 pm
                Police reforms is the need of the hour.The writer has clearly given the action plan with solutions.I hope,PM appoints Prakash Singh as his Internal Security Advisor in the PMO and implement all the inputs given.lt;br/gt;If PM Mody cannot do,trust me,no Indian Politician will have the Courage and Guts to introduce the Police reforms
                Reply
                1. A
                  ashok
                  Nov 26, 2016 at 7:31 am
                  Just a couple of days back, saw visuals of policemen beating up a man whom they had forced to the ground. He was a serving soldier, standing in a queue to withdraw / exchange money, back home to perform the last rites for his brother in the village.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments