Emanuel Derman expected to feel a letdown when he left particle physics for a job on Wall Street in 1985. After all,for almost 20 years,as a graduate student at Columbia and a postdoctoral fellow at institutions like Oxford and the University of Colorado,he had been a spear carrier in the quest to unify the forces of nature and establish the elusive and Einsteinian theory of everything, hobnobbing with Nobel laureates and other distinguished thinkers. How could managing money compare?
But the letdown never happened. Instead he fell in love with a corner of finance that dealt with stock options.
Options theory is kind of deep in some way. It was very elegant; it had the quality of physics, Derman explained recently with a tinge of wistfulness,sitting in his office at Columbia,where he is now a professor of finance and a risk management consultant with Prisma Capital Partners.
Derman,who spent 17 years at Goldman Sachs and became managing director,was a forerunner of the many physicists and other scientists who have flooded Wall Street in recent years,moving from a world in which a discrepancy of a few percentage points in a measurement can mean a Nobel Prize or unending mockery to a world in which a few percent one way can land you in jail and a few percent the other way can win you your own private Caribbean island.
They are known as quants because they do quantitative finance. Seduced by a vision of mathematical elegance underlying some of the messiest of human activities,they apply skills they once hoped to use to untangle string theory or the nervous system to making money.
This flood seems to be continuing,unabated by the ongoing economic collapse in this country and abroad. Last fall students filled a giant classroom at MIT to overflowing for an evening workshop called So You Want to Be a Quant. Some quants analyse the stock market. Others churn out the computer models that analyse otherwise unmeasurable risks and profits of arcane deals,or run their own hedge funds and sift through vast universes of data for the slight disparities that can give them an edge.
Still others have opened an academic front,using complexity theory or artificial intelligence to better understand the behavior of humans in markets. In December the physics Web site arXiv.org,where physicists post their papers,added a section for papers on finance. Submissions on subjects like the superstatistics of labor productivity and stochastic volatility models have been streaming in.
Quants occupy a revealing niche in modern capitalism. They make a lot of money but not as much as the traders who tease them and treat them like geeks. Until recently they rarely made partner at places like Goldman Sachs. In some quarters they get blamed for the current breakdown All I can say is,beware of geeks bearing formulas, Warren Buffett said on The Charlie Rose Show last fall. Even the quants tend to agree that what they do is not quite science.
As Derman put it in his book My Life as a Quant: Reflections on Physics and Finance, In physics there may one day be a Theory of Everything; in finance and the social sciences,youre lucky if there is a useable theory of anything.