Stand up while you read this

Sitting down may be worse for you than you think

Written by Olivia Judson | Published:February 28, 2010 6:04 pm

Sitting down may be worse for you than you think
Your chair is your enemy. It doesn’t matter if you go running every morning,or you’re a regular at the gym. If you spend most of the rest of the day sitting—in your car,your office chair,on your sofa at home—you are putting yourself at increased risk of obesity,diabetes,heart disease,a variety of cancers and an early death. In other words,irrespective of whether you exercise vigorously,sitting for long periods is bad for you.

That,at least,is the conclusion of several recent studies. Indeed,if you consider only healthy people who exercise regularly,those who sit the most during the rest of the day have larger waists and worse profiles of blood pressure and blood sugar than those who sit less. Among people who sit in front of the television for more than three hours each day,those who exercise are as fat as those who don’t: sitting a lot appears to offset some of the benefits of jogging a lot.

So what’s wrong with sitting?
The answer seems to have two parts. The first is that sitting is one of the most passive things you can do. You burn more energy by chewing gum or fidgeting than you do sitting still in a chair. Compared to sitting,standing in one place is hard work. To stand,you have to tense your leg muscles,and engage the muscles of your back and shoulders; while standing,you often shift from leg to leg. All of this burns energy.

For many people,weight gain is a matter of slow creep—two pounds this year,three pounds next year. You can gain this much if,each day,you eat just 30 calories more than you burn. Thirty calories is hardly anything—it’s a couple of mouthfuls of banana,or a few potato chips. Thus,a little more time on your feet today and tomorrow can easily make the difference between remaining lean and getting fat.
You may think you have no choice about how much you sit. But this isn’t true. Suppose you sleep for eight hours each day,and exercise for one. That still leaves 15 hours of activities. Even if you exercise,most of the energy you burn will be burnt during these 15 hours,so weight gain is often the cumulative effect of a series of small decisions: Do you take the stairs or the elevator? Do you e-mail your colleague down the hall,or get up and go and see her? When you get home,do you potter about in the garden or sit in front of the television? Do you walk to the corner store,or drive?

Just to underscore the point that you do have a choice: a study of junior doctors doing the same job,the same week,on identical wards found that some individuals walked four times farther than others at work each day. (No one in the study was overweight; but the “long-distance” doctors were thinner than the “short-distance” ones.)
So part of the problem with sitting a lot is that you don’t use as much energy as those who spend more time on their feet. This makes it easier to gain weight,and makes you more prone to the health problems that fatness often brings.

But it looks as though there’s a more sinister aspect to sitting,too. Several strands of evidence suggest that there’s a “physiology of inactivity”: that when you spend long periods sitting,your body actually does things that are bad for you.

As an example,consider lipoprotein lipase. This is a molecule that plays a central role in how the body processes fats; it’s produced by many tissues,including muscles. Low levels of lipoprotein lipase are associated with a variety of health problems,including heart disease. Studies in rats show that leg muscles only produce this molecule when they are actively being flexed (for example,when the animal is standing up and ambling about). The implication is that when you sit,a crucial part of your metabolism slows down.

Nor is lipoprotein lipase the only molecule affected by muscular inactivity. Actively contracting muscles produce a whole suite of substances that have a beneficial effect on how the body uses and stores sugars and fats.

Which might explain the following result. Men who normally walk a lot (about 10,000 steps per day,as measured by a pedometer) were asked to cut back (to about 1,350 steps per day) for two weeks,by using elevators instead of stairs,driving to work instead of walking and so on. By the end of the two weeks,all of them had became worse at metabolising sugars and fats. Their distribution of body fat had also altered — they had become fatter around the middle. Such changes are among the first steps on the road to diabetes.

Conversely,a study of people who sit for many hours found that those who took frequent small breaks—standing up to stretch or walk down the corridor — had smaller waists and better profiles for sugar and fat metabolism than those who did their sitting in long,uninterrupted chunks.

Some people have advanced radical solutions to the sitting syndrome: replace your sit-down desk with a stand-up desk,and equip this with a slow treadmill so that you walk while you work. (Talk about pacing the office.) Make sure that your television can only operate if you are pedalling furiously on an exercise bike. Or,watch television in a rocking chair: rocking also takes energy and involves a continuous gentle flexing of the calf muscles. Get rid of your office chair and replace it with a therapy ball: this too uses more muscles,and hence more energy,than a normal chair,because you have to support your back and work to keep balanced. You also have the option of bouncing,if you like.
Or you could take all this as a license to fidget.
But whatever you choose,know this. The data is clear: beware your chair.
_NYT

For all the latest News Archive News, download Indian Express App

  1. No Comments.