Gir lions country’s property,says SC

No state can claim the right over an animal merely because the animal is housed in a particular state.

Written by Krishnadas Rajagopal | New Delhi | Published:February 22, 2012 1:02 am

The Gujarat government’s argument that there is no need to move the Asiatic lions from the state’s Gir territory prompted the Supreme Court to observe on Tuesday that the big cats are not the “property” of the state,but belong to the country.

“No state can claim the right over an animal merely because the animal is housed in a particular state. It does not become the property of that state,it belongs to the country,” a Forest Bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan and C K Prasad shot back at the state government.

Gujarat is making a spirited case of its distinction as the only state in the country to have Asiatic lions,and is objecting to a plan to re-locate some of the Asiatic lion population to Madhya Pradesh.

The opposition from the state comes despite the National Board for Wildlife also voting against the Gujarat government’s reluctance to shift the lions.

Justice Radhakrishnan told senior advocate Shyam Divan,appearing for the Gujarat government,that the most important question before the court is to preserve a “critically endangered species” and not witness a litigation fought tooth-and-nail about whose lions they are.

Video of the day

For all the latest News Archive News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results