Filing a closure report in the preliminary enquiry registered against Mulayam and his family,the investigating agency,After exploring each possible avenue,CBI has closed the PE against Mulayam and his family members,on account of grossly insufficient evidence.
Later,CBI Director Ranjit Sinha told The Indian Express,We are ready for any legal scrutiny in the matter.
The agency carried out the reassessment of the case after a Supreme Court order in 2012 directing it to exclude the assets,income and expenditure of Mulayams daughter-in-law Dimple Yadav. Careful examination of documents,statement of witnesses and the versions of the suspects during the course of further enquiry,has not brought out sufficient evidence supporting the allegations, the CBI stated.
Defending its action,it said,A large number of advances which were shown as assets as well as expenditure in 2007,leading to double accounting by CBI,now stand corrected. Similarly,a number of heavy advances,despite being refunded subsequently,were taken as assets in 2007. These refunds stand corroborated from the bank accounts statements. Earlier,these advances were shown as assets on the basis of their reflection in a particular income tax return.
- Here’s Why Delhi-NCR Gets Pollution Code On Lines Of Beijing
- PM Modi Is More Interested In TRP Politics Rahul Gandhi At Congress Parliamentary Meet
- Bigg Boss 10 December 1 Review: Priyanka Jagga Succeeds In Her Divide And Rule Strategy
- Kahaani 2 Audience Reaction: Vidya Balan Starrer Thriller Gets Mixed Reviews
- Find Out What PM Modi Said About Demonetisation On LinkedIn
- Row Over West Bengal ”Military Coup” Issue Escalates: Who Said What
- Here’s How Mohammad Kaif Replied To Virender Sehwag’s Birthday Wish On Twitter
- West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s Flight Reportedly Had Low Fuel: Here’s What Happened
- Reliance Jio Welcome Offer Extended Till March 31, JioMoney Launched
- Uri Attackers Came From Pakistan, Establishes Digital Data
- Bigg Boss 10 Nov 30 Episode Review: Captaincy Brings Differences In Manoj Punjabi & Manveer Gurjar
- Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi’s Official Twitter Handle Hacked
- After Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter Handle, Congress Official Twitter Account Hacked
- 3 Dead As Army Helicopter Crashes In Sukna In West Bengal
- BJP, Congress Engage In War Of Words Over Nagrota Attack: Find Out More
It said the further enquiry in 2013 also undertook an amount of Rs 8.42 lakh as expenditure on account of the education of Akhilesh Yadav abroad,which was not there in the 2007 probe.
In its closure report,the CBI said each and every item brought out in the earlier findings of CBI has been thoroughly re-examined and reassessed. Care has also been taken to probe every single item finding mention in the writ petition of Vishwanath Chaturvedi.
The CBI gave a clean chit to Mulayam in connection with the construction of a house at Saifai,for which it earlier recommended valuation. According to the CBI,it was found that out of the total cost of Rs 1.41 crore,the contribution by Mulayam,wife Malti Devi and son Akhilesh was less than 10 per cent.
The CBI probe claimed that the house was constructed by Mulayams father Sughar Singh Yadav,between 1994 and 2004.
A CBI note also said,The alleged stakes of Shri Mulayam Singh and his family members in Ch Charan Singh Post Graduate College at Hewara and in the UP Rural Institute of Medical Science and Research at Saifai have not been substantiated.
The preliminary enquiry was registered by CBI on the directions of Supreme Court in 2007. Hearing the petition filed by Vishwanath Chaturvedi in 2005,the court had asked the CBI to probe into the assets and income of the SP chief and his family members. The CBI claims that since Mulayam and his family members did not join the enquiry at the initial stage,it was concluded in 2007 in which the DA came to around Rs 2.63 crore. This was without taking into account the defence of Mulayam and his family members,the agency claims.
PETITIONER slams CBI
Questioning the closure report,Vishwanath Chaturvedi told The Indian Express,The CBI has been protecting Mulayam and his family from time to time at the instance of the government. It is now up to the SC to decide the matter. The agency has not done its investigation properly. My petition to include Dimple in the enquiry is also pending before the SC. How can they exclude Dimple if all the properties acquired by her are held jointly? The calculation shown by the CBI is all forged and fraud.