The International Cricket Council (ICC) re-stated its faith in technology in an assessment of contentious decisions during Englands victory over Australia in the first Ashes Test.
The ICC said on Tuesday that the umpiring team made seven errors during the Trent Bridge Test,of which three went uncorrected and four were corrected by the Decision Review System (DRS),which allows teams two unsuccessful referrals per innings.
The three decisions that were marked as uncorrected errors included one against Jonathan Trott when a correct LBW decision was overturned. The other two involved Stuart Broad. One of them came at a pivotal moment during Englands second innings,when Broad didnt walk when he should have been given out for nicking a delivery to Michael Clarke.
Dars long test
Clarke had already used Australias two referrals,and Broads decision to continue sparked a debate over the batsmans ethics,Clarkes decision-making,and Aleem Dars future as a Test umpire. The other uncorrected errors were an lbw involving Broad,and Jonathan Trott given lbw upon review after he had originally been given not out.
The ICC said the umpires made a total of 72 decisions at Trent Bridge,which is well above the average (49) for a DRS Test match. As such,the correct decision percentage before reviews stood at 90.3 per cent but climbed to 95.8 per cent as a result of the use of the DRS. This represented an increase of 5.5 per cent in correct decisions,which was the average increase from DRS Test matches in 2012-13. When coupled with the conditions,with reverse swing and spin playing an important role,and the added intensity of the first Ashes Test,it was a difficult match to umpire, the ICC statement said.
ICC chief executive Dave Richardson,meanwhile,defended the umpires.
Like the players,umpires can also have good and bad days but we all know that the umpires decision,right or wrong,is final and must be accepted, ICC chief executive David Richardson said. While the ICC has complete faith in the ability of its umpires,our confidence in technology is also strengthened by the fact that there was an increase in the number of correct decisions in the Trent Bridge Test through the use of the DRS.
Richardson,though,said there was still room for improvement. Technology was introduced with the objective of eradicating the obvious umpiring errors,and to get as many correct decisions as possible, he said. If it can help increase the correct decisions by 5.5 per cent,then it is a good outcome. But we must continue to strive to improve umpiring and the performance of the DRS.