Devyani arrest case: Why no outrage over victim,asks US prosecutor

Help's family brought from India after attempt to silence her,claims US prosecutor Preet Bharara.

Written by YoshitaSingh | New York | Published:December 20, 2013 3:06 am

Amid the outrage over the arrest and subsequent treatment of Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade,US federal prosecutor Preet Bharara on Thursday defended the action against her and confirmed that her domestic help’s family has been “evacuated” from India.

Acknowledging that the family of Sangeeta Richard,who was employed by Khobragade,has been brought to the US,Bharara said a legal process was started in India to “silence her and attempts were made to compel her to return to India”.

A 1999-batch IFS officer,Khobragade,India’s Deputy Consul General in New York,was arrested on December 12 on visa fraud charges. In her complaint,Richard accused the diplomat of violating US laws by underpaying her and forcing her to work for 19 hours a day.

In a three-page statement here,Bharara said Richard’s family was confronted in numerous ways regarding this case. “Some focus should perhaps be put on why it was necessary to evacuate the family and what actions were taken in India vis-a-vis them. This office and the Justice Department are compelled to make sure that the victims,witnesses and their families are safe and secure while cases are pending,” he said.

“This office’s sole motivation in this case,as in all cases,is to uphold the rule of law,protect victims,and hold accountable anyone who breaks the law — no matter what their societal status and no matter how powerful,rich or connected they are,” he said.

Bharara said Khobragade evaded US laws designed to protect the domestic employees of diplomats and consular officers from exploitation. Rebutting reports of the diplomat not being given proper treatment,he claimed she was “accorded courtesies well beyond what other defendants,most of whom are American citizens,are accorded.”

The US prosecutor denied that she was arrested in front of her children and handcuffed. “She was not,as has been incorrectly reported,arrested in front of her children. The agents arrested her in the most discreet way possible,and unlike most defendants,she was not then handcuffed or restrained,” he said.

“In fact,the arresting officers did not even seize her phone as they normally would have. Instead,they offered her the opportunity to make numerous calls to arrange personal matters and contact whomever she needed,including allowing her to arrange for child care,” he said.

Bharara said the entire process lasted approximately two hours and since it was cold outside,the agents let her make those calls from their car and “even brought her coffee and offered to get her food.”

The prosecutor conceded that the diplomat was strip-searched. “It is true that she was fully searched by a female deputy marshal — in a private setting — when she was brought into the US Marshals’ custody,but this is standard practice for every defendant,rich or poor,American or not,in order to make sure that no prisoner keeps anything on his person that could harm anyone,including himself,” he said.

He said there has been “misinformation and factual inaccuracy” in the reporting on the Khobragade case which is “creating an inflammatory atmosphere”. “There has been much misinformation and factual inaccuracy in the reporting on the charges against Khobragade. It is important to correct these inaccuracies because they are misleading people and creating an inflammatory atmosphere on an unfounded basis,” he said.

Accusing Khobragade of fraud,Bharara said: “Not only did she try to evade the law,but as further alleged,she caused the victim and her spouse to attest to false documents and be a part of her scheme to lie to US government officials… So it is alleged not merely that she sought to evade the law,but that she affirmatively created false documents and went ahead with lying to the US government about what she was doing.

One wonders whether any government would not take action regarding false documents being submitted to it in order to bring immigrants into the country. One wonders even more pointedly whether any government would not take action regarding that alleged conduct where the purpose of the scheme was to unfairly treat a domestic worker in ways that violate the law. And one wonders why there is so much outrage about the alleged treatment of the Indian national accused of perpetrating these acts,but precious little outrage about the alleged treatment of the Indian victim and her spouse?”

Bharara said his office is in charge of prosecution,not the arrest or custody of a defendant,and so questions regarding Khobragade’s arrest by State Department agents “may be better referred to other agencies”. He added that as the alleged conduct of Khobragade makes clear,“there can be no plausible claim that this case was somehow unexpected or an injustice.”

He said while the law is clearly set forth on the State Department website,there have been other public cases in the United States involving other countries,and some involving India,where the mistreatment of domestic workers by diplomats or consular officers was charged criminally.

For all the latest News Archive News, download Indian Express App

  1. No Comments.