Marlon James became the first Jamaican winner of the prestigious Booker Prize for fiction Tuesday with a vivid, violent, exuberant and expletive-laden novel based on the attempted assassination of Bob Marley.
Michael Wood, chairman of the judging panel, said “A Brief History of Seven Killings” was “the most exciting book on the list” and a novel full of the “sheer pleasure” of language. He said it had been the unanimous choice of the five judges.
James was awarded the 50,000 pound ($77,000) prize during a black-tie dinner at London’s medieval Guildhall. The 44-year-old author said he almost gave up writing more than a decade ago when his first novel, “John Crow’s Devil,” was rejected by 70 publishers. He said winning the Booker Prize was “surreal,” and joked that he would spend the prize money on a tailor-made suit or “every William Faulkner novel in hardcover.”
- Jeet Thayil was inspired by 'soothing sound' of his father's typewriter
- George Saunders' 'Lincoln in the Bardo' wins 2017 Man Booker prize
- Quiz: How well do you know author Kazuo Ishiguro?
- English author Kazuo Ishiguro gets Nobel Prize for Literature 2017; readers rejoice on Twitter
- Arundhati Roy out of Man Booker race
- 2015 Booker Prize Winner Marlon James lashes out at Indian airport authorities on Facebook
He said he hoped his victory would bring “more attention to what’s coming out of Jamaica and the Caribbean, because I think there are some brand-new voices coming out who are exploring contemporary society, who are exploring what’s beyond politics, what’s beyond colonialism.”
“A Brief History of Seven Killings” charts political violence in Jamaica and the spread of crack cocaine in the U.S., and hinges on a 1976 attempt on the life of reggae superstar Marley, identified in the book only as “The Singer.” The story is told in a cacophony of voices, from gangsters to ghosts, drug dealers to CIA agents, and in dialects ranging from American English to Jamaican patois.
James, who teaches creative writing at Macalester College in Saint Paul, Minnesota, said he saw the book as “a novel of exile.”
He said distance from Jamaica had given him “a certain courage to go into topics like violence and the aftermath of violence and sexuality. … I think I needed that distance and I needed that perspective.”
Critics have compared the novel to the stream-of-consciousness novels of William Faulkner and the hyper-violent movies of Quentin Tarantino, while James has cited Charles Dickens as an influence on his multi-character depiction of society.
Wood acknowledged that the book’s plentiful sex, violence and swearing might put off buyers who “like to give the Booker winners to their mother to read.”
But he said the novel’s verve and humor would win over readers.
Wood said although much of the subject matter is grim, “a lot of it is very, very funny.”
The Booker guarantees a big boost in sales for the winner, and can transform writers’ careers. When Hilary Mantel won for her Tudor saga “Wolf Hall” in 2009, she went from being a modestly successful novelist to a literary superstar.
James beat five other authors, including two Americans: Pulitzer Prize winner Anne Tyler, for the multi-generational family saga “A Spool of Blue Thread,” and Hawaiian writer Hanya Yanagihara for “A Little Life,” the story of four male friends, one of whom is a survivor of horrific child abuse.
The other finalists were British writer Sunjeev Sahota’s immigrants’ story “The Year of the Runaways”; the fratricide fable “The Fishermen,” by Nigeria’s Chigozie Obioma; and British writer Tom McCarthy’s digital drama “Satin Island.”
This is the second year the prize has been open to English-language writers of all nationalities. It had previously been restricted to writers from Britain, Ireland and the Commonwealth of former British colonies.
Founded in 1969, the award is officially named the Man Booker Prize after its sponsor, financial services firm Man Group PLC.
Jonathan Ruppin, Web editor at British bookstore chain Foyles, said James’ book would “provoke an intense amount of reader curiosity and some fascinating debate.”
“This is what the Booker is about, it’s about treating readers to something that the novel hasn’t done before,” he said.