Why trial court order in Sohrabuddin case was not challenged, Bombay HC asks CBI

Hearing a revision application filed by Sohrabuddin's brother Rubabuddin Sheikh, challenging the trial court orders of discharge, Justice Revati Mohite-Dere said the CBI should be "equally aggrieved" with the trial court's order.

By: PTI | Mumbai | Published: September 29, 2017 7:43 pm
Sohrabuddin, Sohrabuddin case, Bombay High court, CBI, sohrabuddin fake encounter case Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court today asked the Central Bureau of Investigation why it had not challenged the trial court orders discharging senior IPS officers in the alleged fake encounter case of Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Tulsiram Prajapati.

Hearing a revision application filed by Sohrabuddin’s brother Rubabuddin Sheikh, challenging the trial court orders of discharge, Justice Revati Mohite-Dere said the CBI should be “equally aggrieved” with the trial court’s order.

She asked the probe agency whether it was planning to challenge the trial court orders of August 2016 and August 2017 discharging IPS officers Rajkumar Pandiyan, D G Vanzara, and Dinesh M N.

Justice Mohite-Dere also instructed the CBI counsel to refrain from framing of charges against any accused in the case until October 12, the next date of hearing in the HC.

Rubabuddin has filed separate petitions challenging the discharge of the three officers from the case. His counsel Gautam Tiwari told the court today that “citing the orders of discharge of the above three officials, several other accused persons too were securing discharge on the grounds of parity.”

The Special CBI court in Mumbai is hearing the case after the Supreme Court ordered the trial be transferred out of Gujarat. The court discharged the officials on the ground that the CBI had failed to get prior sanction or the special permission to prosecute them and therefore they could not be prosecuted.

Of the 38 accused in the case, 15 have been discharged by the special court. Fourteen of the 15 discharged are IPS officers.

The CBI has challenged the discharge of only one officer — N K Amin, one of the key accused in the case. Justice Mohite-Dere, however, questioned whether the lack of such sanction alone could be adequate reason to warrant an accused person’s discharge from the case. She also dismissed the CBI’s argument that it had challenged the discharge of two Rajasthan police sub-inspectors– Himanshu Singh and Shyam Singh Charan.

“You are opposing the discharge of sub-inspectors and constables. But what about the IPS officers? Can the sole ground of lack of sanction be reason for discharge? All the IPS officers accused in the case have been discharged, only one has been challenged. The law is the same for all applicants. And you (CBI) must be as aggrieved as the applicant (Rubabuddin) with the discharge orders,” Justice Mohite-Dere said.

Sohrabuddin Sheikh and his wife Kausar Bi were allegedly abducted by the Gujarat Anti-Terrorism Squad from Hyderabad on their way to Sangli in Maharashtra. Sheikh was killed in an alleged fake encounter near Gandhinagar in November 2005, after which his wife disappeared.

Prajapati, an aide of Sheikh and a witness to the encounter, was allegedly killed by police in Chapri village in Gujarat’s Banaskantha district in December 2006. Vanzara, who was heading the ATS at the time, was charged by the CBI of having conspired with the other accused officials to kill Sheikh and the other victims and pass the incident off as an encounter.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results