Supreme Court judges press conference: Reputation of judiciary has been affected, says ex-SC judge N Santosh Hegde

Hegde, a former Lokayukta of Karnataka, said their action would not benefit anybody other than drawing public attention. He said institutions like the judiciary survive on the confidence of the people.

By: PTI | Bengaluru | Published: January 13, 2018 8:35 pm
Former Supreme Court judge N Santosh Hegde (File) 

Former Supreme Court judge N Santosh Hegde on Saturday “wholly” condemned the action of four senior judges in going public over internal matters of the judiciary, saying it affected the reputation of the institution and may amount to contempt of court.

Questioning their action, he said internal matters of the judiciary should not have been brought to the public for discussion, because neither the public, nor the government or the executive can give any relief to them. “I wholly condemn the press meet on Friday held by the four judges of the Supreme Court.

“My complaint is these things should not have been publicly discussed, consequent to which the reputation of the judiciary has been affected,” he told PTI.

In an unprecedented move in the country’s judicial history, Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph had held a press conference on Friday and mounted a virtual revolt against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, questioning him on the ‘selective’ allocation of cases and certain judicial orders passed by him.

Hegde, a former Lokayukta of Karnataka, said their action would not benefit anybody other than drawing public attention. He said institutions like the judiciary survive on the confidence of the people.

“Once the confidence of the people is lost, the institution will be useless,” he said.

Agreeing that the judges’ intention was to ‘bring the muck out of the system, he disapproved of their approach as it would set a new precedent where judges of High Courts and the Supreme Court would start bringing their differences into the public domain.

On whether their action was liable for impeachment,Hegde said he does not want to go to that extent, though he felt it can be possible, given the fact that a Calcutta High Court judge was impeached for contempt of court. He however, felt that their action may amount to contempt of court.

“Yes, it may amount to contempt of court but I am not talking about that…I don’t want to take the issue to another direction. I am only questioning the action of the four judges who came out saying that the Chief Justice is being giving cases according to his whims and fancies.

“Yes, that is the jurisdiction given to him. And why not? That bench before which the case is posted does not have only person. There are two other judges there.”

“That means you are suspecting the three judges. Let us not denigrate the institution,” said Hegde.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Bikramjit Singh
    Jan 14, 2018 at 6:00 pm
    If no one is listening to them then what is the option mr hegde? And why scared of going public? In democracy public is the final master. People have the right to know everything.
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. Dmg Klburg
      Jan 14, 2018 at 1:30 am
      RIGHTLY SAID PURELY A RETREAT ! PAPPU TRAITORS BLEW THEMSELVES BLEW UP BY BEING ON TV OR MEETING JUDGES AT THEIR RESIDENCE, THEIR CUNNING SCHEME OF EXPECTATION WAS THE WHOLE COUNTRY TO COME ON STREET!
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. Chandrasekaran Subramanian
        Jan 13, 2018 at 11:52 pm
        He was on the roads during Anna movement against all canons of decency. And after so much of anarchy lokpal is yet to see the light of the day. Four years. Modi govt is sitting on it. And the foursome with courage have brought the for out in the open. Extraordinary circumstances requires equally extraordinary responses. Sanctimony.
        (1)(0)
        Reply
        1. Sudalaimani Soundararaj
          Jan 13, 2018 at 10:31 pm
          Indian judiciary is having re tion? It is the biggest joke of the year by Santosh Hedge.
          (0)(0)
          Reply