• Associate Sponsor

Supreme Court crisis: No meeting held with CJI, judges propose roster reform panel

As of now, the SC Roster is not known to the public. Making it public has been one of the demands of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) too.

By: Express News Service | New Delhi | Updated: February 1, 2018 6:57 am
Supreme Court, Chief Justice of India, Dipak Misra, Dipak Misra meets judges, sc judges meet, SC judges, Supreme Court crisis, Indian Express the Supreme Court of India. (Express Photo by Tashi Tobgyal)

A scheduled meeting between four senior judges of the Supreme Court, who went public with their criticism against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, and the CJI did not materialise on Wednesday, with one of them, Justice J Chelameswar, on leave. Sources said the crisis after the January 12 press conference by Justices Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph remained unresolved. With Justice Chelameswar set to be away on Thursday, too, this makes the prospect of the meeting unlikely till next week.

Sources said that at the previous meeting, held last week, the moot point under discussion was a proposal from the Chief Justice that all five judges must come out together publicly and state that all issues were now being resolved. Sources say the four judges declined to do so until they saw visible and tangible progress on “issues” raised by them, and “as promised by the Chief Justice.”

Read | Four judges have a plan for CJI Dipak Misra to reform roster

The four judges who raised concerns over the allocation of cases are learnt to have proposed the setting up of a committee comprising judges who would be Chief Justices in the future to suggest an institutional mechanism for marking of cases as per the Roster that would be notified by the SC Registry. As of now, the SC Roster is not known to the public. Making it public has been one of the demands of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) too.

Justices Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur and Kurian Joseph held a press conference in New Delhi (Express Photo/Abhinav Saha)

They also want the CJI to communicate the setting up of the committee to the public. Once the suggestions are finalised, the same should be uploaded to the court’s official webpage, so that procedure would be known to all and, in turn, boost transparency.

The CJI has not responded to the suggestions. Though he is open to the committee, the question of inclusion of future Chief Justices remains a thorny issue. Sources said a clearer picture would emerge in a week’s time.

All available judges, other than Justice Chelameswar, meanwhile attended the customary lunch which the SC judges take turns to host every Wednesday. The host judge serves his or her home cuisine at the lunch. This Wednesday, it was the Justice A K Goel’s turn to play host.

Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justices Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph, Amitava Roy at the launch of the Supreme Court Bar Association newsletter in New Delhi on Tuesday. (Photo by Neeraj Priyadarshi)

The Chief Justice has been asserting his rights as ‘master of the roster’, but in a series of instances, the four Judges had pointed out in their letter written to him two and a half months ago, which they made public, the rostering of cases was such as to not inspire confidence in the system being fair, transparent or just.

The matter of hearing a petition on the controversial Medical Council of India (MCI) cases had brought issues to the fore when Justice Chelameswar had constituted a bench. It was overruled by the Chief Justice in an unprecedented move by him within hours and kept with a bench of which he was himself a member.

The five judges are incidentally, also members of the collegium which decides on fresh appointments, transfers and postings. No meeting of the collegium has so far been held after the press conference.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Masa Kola
    Feb 1, 2018 at 10:57 am
    When the Indian democracy is in danger the four judges including Chellameshwar destroyed re tion of SC. When the judiciary is in crices he goes on leave. When politicians should be kept at hands distance Chellameshwar meets D Raja secretly. This is the last ditch attempt ny Congress and corrupt lobby to destroy Modi. But he is stronger than these schemers.
    (0)(10)
    Reply
    1. Mast Malang
      Feb 1, 2018 at 10:27 am
      CJI is having thick skin like our political class, whatever allegation are there against them, they are hardly bother about that.
      (12)(0)
      Reply
      1. Madan Gupta
        Feb 1, 2018 at 9:47 am
        show them the door, they are very irresponsible person. How can they give justice to people. They may be under the influence the money to silence CJI. Check their assets. One judge has finished 6 months in Jail, give them 6 years.
        (0)(15)
        Reply
        1. A
          Ashok
          Feb 1, 2018 at 7:14 am
          Why such importance is given by the press on the fight in the court? Judges too have weakness as all of us have. Why not involve domain experts in decision making which is feasible due to development of IT. A paradigm shift in thinking is needed in NEW INDIA. Thousands of people in the society who studied/ practiced/ experienced in so call ed law- could to be omly selected( over 400) and some mathematical frame work should be developed to find out the answer as Guilty OR Not Guilty. The procedure will assist the Judges decision making. This exactly I mean by democratic transparency in democracy. The model will remove biases.I have tried to develop a mathematical framework and discussed with a very senior Stanford Criminal law Professor and Judge and appreciated it. What is needed is OUT OF THE BOX THINKING. Is GOI wants to give a fair trial to my model. Erudite comments are welcome. Professor Ashok Deshpande PhD Founding Chair: BISC_SIG-EMS UC Berkeley California
          (0)(23)
          Reply