Quota in promotions: Five-judge bench to decide whether 2006 order needs to be revisited

In 2006, a five-judge Constitution Bench had ruled that the state was not bound to provide reservation for SCs/STs in promotions.

Written by Ananthakrishnan G | New Delhi | Updated: November 16, 2017 7:25 am
Supreme Court, Jharkhand HC , Jharkhan ex-minister, Jharkhand news, Jharkhand government, India news, Indian express news Supreme Court (File)

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court will examine whether its 2006 judgment on the reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in promotions needs to be revisited.

The matter was referred to the Constitution Bench Wednesday by a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan. The Constitution Bench has to decide on the limited issue whether the order in M Nagaraj vs Union of India needs to be looked at afresh. The Constitution Bench will not go into the merit of the matter.

In 2006, a five-judge Constitution Bench had ruled that the state was not bound to provide reservation for SCs/STs in promotions. But in case any state wished to make such a provision, it was required to collect quantifiable data showing backwardness of the class as well as its inadequate representation in public employment. Additionally, the state was required to ensure that reservation does not breach the 50 per cent ceiling, adversely affect the creamy layer or extend it indefinitely.

Acting on a 2015 petition filed by the Tripura government which challenged an order of the Tripura High Court, a two-judge bench of Justices Kurian Joseph and R Banumathi referred the matter Tuesday to a Constitution Bench.
“Having regard to the questions involved in this case, we are of the opinion that this is a case to be heard by a bench as per the constitutional mandate under Article 145(3) of the Constitution of India. Ordered accordingly. Place the files before the Honourable Chief Justice of India immediately,” the two-judge bench said.

A petition before the High Court had challenged certain provisions of The Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Reservation of vacancies in services and posts) Act, 1991, saying that under these provisions, the state had granted reservation in violation of rules laid down in M Nagaraj vs Union of India case.

The reference made by the bench of Justices Joseph and Banumathi was taken up by a three-judge bench headed by CJI Misra Wednesday. “Can a two-judge judge bench directly refer a matter to our Constitution Bench,” the CJI asked, adding that a Constitution Bench will first decode if the matter needs to be reconsidered at all.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. P
    PURU
    Nov 16, 2017 at 4:15 pm
    HAR JAGAH RESEVATION CHAIYE MEHNAT NAHI KARNI
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. Y
      yash sehgal
      Nov 16, 2017 at 8:39 am
      Reservation of any type, except for handicapped n war widows, is an anathema, a blot n a stigma, absolute travesty of natural justice. But instead of doing away with it, why it's allowed to be revisited. A sheer injusice bt Nehfu Ambedkar duo, cleverly inserted in Cons ution for only ten years but extended perpetually n then added 22 percent more in the name of mandal commission fr obc. Thumbs down from congies, commies , sickulars n beneficiaries most welcomed, that i will consider commendations.
      (3)(2)
      Reply
      1. F
        Fca Prashant Chavan
        Nov 16, 2017 at 8:13 am
        16.11.2017 Dear Ananthakrishnan G, When the Hon'ble President has already accented to the death sentence of the three main convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, I see no reason for the Supreme Court to deliberate over the issue with an intent to pardon the accused in the case ...
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. P
          p g
          Nov 16, 2017 at 6:50 am
          Quota in each and every sphere of our life has to be re-visited and stopped. Hard-working, educated and experienced are suffering very much. Many years giving quota is sufficient. Life long giving quota is deterous to human life in our nation. Instead, funds for the under previlaged should flow in and educate them and bring them on stream now. Enough is enough. Where are the non quota members of our society going to get educated, get jobs to build this nation etc etc.
          (4)(2)
          Reply
          1. I
            Indian
            Nov 16, 2017 at 6:38 am
            The problem is with the parallel uncons utional Manuwadi quota system which is perpetrated by those in power. Why else is our private sector which has insulated itself from reservations inferior to the public sector which is regularly taunted for being "plagued" by reservations. Let us also not forget that all major defeats of Hindus to foreign powers happened under the watch of the elite castes.
            (4)(1)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments