Uncertainty over LoP status continues; Kamal Nath says Cong must go to court if Speaker decides against party

Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu said everyone must abide by the presiding officer's decision.

By: Press Trust of India | New Delhi/hyderabad | Updated: July 6, 2014 7:20 pm
Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu said everyone must abide by the presiding officer's decision. (Source: PTI) Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu said everyone must abide by the presiding officer’s decision. (Source: PTI)

With no clarity on Congress getting the Leader of Opposition (LoP) status in Lok Sabha, senior leader Kamal Nath on Sunday said the party “must” go to court if Speaker Sumitra Mahajan’s decision, which could be “flavoured” by BJP and Narendra Modi, went against it.

Insisting that there is no rule, which says that a party cannot get LoP status unless it has 10 per cent of the total strength of the 543-member Lok Sabha, the former Parliamentary Affairs Minister said in Delhi that while a Speaker is generally neutral when it comes to dealing with Parliamentary processes, it may be different in a contentious situation.

In Hyderabad, Union Minister M Venkaiah Naidu said everyone must abide by the presiding officer’s decision.

“There was no Opposition Leader during Nehruji’s regime. There was no Opposition Leader during Indira Gandhi’s era. Opposition Leader was not there in Rajiv Gandhi’s rule,” Naidu contended.

Picking on BJP, Nath said, “We know the Speaker is from the BJP… Speaker is appointed by a political party… when it is a contentious situation… It (the decision on LoP) will be flavoured by the BJP and Modi,” Nath told Karan Thapar in an interview on Headlines Today.

He was replying to a question on why he was raising fingers on the intention of the government in this matter when the decision on LoP will be taken by the Speaker.

While hastening to add that what he says “does not mean that she is acting on the behest of somebody”, Nath insisted, “But there is always a flavour”.

He also said that if the Speaker rules against Congress on the LoP issue, it would be right and proper for the Congress to go to the court.

“Certainly, we must. It should be one of the options,” he said.

At the same time he said that Congress won’t retaliate or be obstructive in Parliament simply because the LoP status is denied to it as party President Sonia Gandhi won’t like it.

Tossing the ball in Speaker’s court, Naidu said, “It is people’s verdict and matter related to Constitution. Speaker’s decision should be adhered to and let’s see how the Speaker decides. There are some conventions, rules and regulations, precedents and directions of the Speaker. They are all there before us. Everybody has to go by that,” he said.

Nath also vehemently countered the contention that Rahul Gandhi is reluctant to take responsibility and cited instances from last 30 years when the Leader of House of a party and its President were two different persons.

On the threat of Congress moving the court, Naidu retorted, “They have got every right to go to court. You can go to court for not getting Prime Minister’s post also.

Anybody can go to court in this country for any thing. Many people go to courts. They have got every right to go. Constitution permits it. Let them go.”

“But people’s court has decided. People have given a mandate. We are in democracy. These things cannot be decided by judiciary. They have to be decided by people,” he said.

The Speaker had on Saturday steered clear of the issue despite Congress pitching for it.

Mahajan had earlier said she will take a decision on the issue before the budget session, which commences tomorrow, after consulting constitutional experts and “experienced” persons.

While Congress secured 44 seats in the 543-member Lok Sabha, government managers have said it was less than the requisite strength of 10 per cent of the House’s total strength to make the party eligible to get the LoP post.

Insisting that the powers of the Speaker are “neither arbitrary, nor unbridled or unilateral” on deciding the issue, Congress spokesman Randeep Surjewala had said the LoP post is a “constitutional right” of Congress as the biggest party in the opposition as also the biggest pre-poll alliance.

Asked about remarks by Congress leaders that getting the LoP position is their right, Naidu said Congress is not able to accept its electoral defeat.

“People have decided whatever they had to decide. We hope that Congress and all of us together run the Parliament and do good for people and make efforts for country’s development,” the senior BJP leader said.


For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. A
    Jul 7, 2014 at 11:36 am
    Congress false pride will not go that easily. The truth that they are a thoroughly corrupt party which was completely rejected by the people should be hammered everyday into them.
    1. G
      Jul 6, 2014 at 3:29 pm
      modi sarkar will be more than happy if congress went to court for LOP.then it will be said that although they've lost power, congressmen haven't lost their greed for power in any form.even if the congress wins the case, it will lose some more seats in upcoming embly elections. and that would suit BJP just fine.
      1. G
        Jul 6, 2014 at 10:20 pm
        LOP is just a le. Opposition MPs will remain regardless of whether or not one of them is granted Leader of Opposition status. But if they do not deserve the status why waste taxpayer money by granting them the LOP seat with its ry and privileges?
        1. V
          Jul 6, 2014 at 3:22 pm
          What Congress has to say for all those years of past when under its own rule it never gave this status to opposition who did not have 10 % numbers.
          1. U
            U N
            Jul 6, 2014 at 3:58 pm
            When Congress got less than ten percent of seats in Lok Sabha , they have no right to plead for the position of Opposition Leader. They should gracefully accept the decision of Speaker even it favors BJP taking their own past into consideration. This will have a good flavor.
            1. Load More Comments