Aafter a veiled reference to the RSS in his concern over whether people “want to hand over the country to chaddiwalas”, NCP president Sharad Pawar has now gone the whole hog in his criticism. “There are serious reservations about the RSS among the secular within the majority community. So, how can one expect the minorities to display their confidence in the RSS?” he said in an interview to The Indian Express at his Peddar Road residence in Mumbai.
The RSS’s “divisive politics didn’t augur well for the country,” he added.
On a break from his extensive campaign that included close to a hundred rallies, Pawar said the “hidden agenda” of the RSS-BJP was out in the open. “The BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi has the full backing of the RSS. Their manifesto includes controversial issues like Ram Temple and Article 371,” he said.
Pawar rubbished claims that late prime minister Indira Gandhi sought help from the RSS on national issues. “The RSS may have supported her after the creation of Bangladesh, that too because of anti-Pakistan sentiment. To my knowledge, the Congress has never sought help from the RSS,” he said.
Reflecting on the mood in the nation at the end of four phases of polling, he said, “ The coalition era is here to stay for at least the next 10 to 15 years. I still believe the next government will be either led by Congress or BJP.”
- Shah Rukh Khan On Raees Clash With Kaabil: It’s Impossible To Have A Solo Release In India
- US-President Elect Donald Trump Named TIME’s Person Of The Year 2016
- O. Panneerselvam: 10 Things You Need To Know
- PM Narendra Modi Slams Opposition For Not Letting Parliament Function
- Nawazuddin Siddiqui On Working In Raees: Was Nervous To Shoot With Shah Rukh Khan
- Bathinda Dancer Murder: Video Showing Accused Opening Fire At Marriage
- 5 Lesser Known Facts About Sasikala Natarajan
- Congress Leader Shashi Tharoor’s Delhi Home Burgled: Here’s What Happened
- Reserve Bank Of India Keeps Repo Rate Unchanged Post Demonetisation
- Bigg Boss 10 Dec 06 Review: Swami Om Pees In Kitchen
- Lenovo k6 Power Video Review
- Bigg Boss 10 December 5 Review: Manveer Calls Swami Om ‘kachdaa’
- PM Narendra Modi Declared Winner Of TIME Magazine’s Person Of The Year – Reader’s Poll
- Paneerselvam sworn in as new Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu
- Tamil Nadu CM J Jayalalithaa Passes Away After Suffering Cardiac Arrest
But he added that regional forces, like Mamata Banerjee, “who have worked with both Congress and BJP in the past will certainly not accept Modi at the helm. Atal Bihari Vajpyee was tolerant and accommodative. I don’t see similar traits in Modi who likes total control”. Playing up the divisions in the BJP, he said, “It is shocking to see BJP founder L K Advani at Modi’s mercy. Advani was forced to contest the seat suggested by Modi. Even Jaswant Singh, an excellent foreign minister and finance minister, was not given a ticket contest. It shows Modi’s highhandedness.”
Pawar doesn’t believe there is a Modi wave, but admits that the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate has touched a chord with the youth — something that his party, and the Congress completely lacked.
“I don’t believe there is a Modi wave. But Modi’s aggressive campaign, and adoption of modern methods and technology has made inroads among the younger generation. The Congress and NCP completely lacked in such initiatives as we went by our traditional methods,” he said. He said the Congress totally appeared laid back in its campaign. “It should have been collective team work. There are very good leaders in Congress like Digvijay Singh, who together would have been counter-effective.”
Pawar refused to comment on AICC vice-president Rahul Gandhi’s leadership, but said, “ I feel a collective team work approach would have been better. In NCP, we have atleast a dozen leaders campaigning.”
However, he expressed “great satisfaction” over Congress and NCP working unitedly in this election. In a candid admission he said, “ I had given my consent to attend the Sonia Gandhi rally at Mumbai. But when I was told she could not attend, I decided to skip and campaign for my candidate. After all, my absence from the campaign would have affected my candidate.”