The blame game has begun in the Congress, even as the party’s top leadership is learnt to have drawn up a plan to shield Rahul Gandhi and ensure that his pre-eminence does not come under question immediately.
Indications are that a high-level committee could be formed to look into all aspects of the defeat, buying the top leadership time before acting.
- Ae Dil Hai Mushkil Audience Reaction: Ranbir, Aishwarya, Anushka Starrer Gets A Thumbs Up
- Bigg Boss 10, October 27 Review: Navin, Lokesh Fights During The Immunity Task
- Shivaay Audience Reaction: Ajay Devgn Impresses Viewers
- Pakistan High Commission Staffer Caught With Defence Documents: What It Means For India & Pakistan
- The Royal Opera House Reopens After Decades Of Neglect: Here’s A Quick Tour
- Tata Sons Rubbishes Cyrus Mistry’s Allegations: Here’s What Happened
- Pakistan High Commissioner denies allegations leveled on his staffer for espionage activities
- Odisha: Villagers Refuse To Cremate Dalit Woman’s Body
- Here’s What Farhan Akhtar Said On Karan Johar-MNS ‘Deal’ Over Ae Dil Hai Mushkil’s Release
- Government’s Diwali Gift to Central Government Employees, Pensioners
- Bigg Boss 10 26th October Review: This Episode Is All About Fights
- New Zealand Beat India By 19 Runs In Ranchi; Series Levelled At 2-2
- DND Toll-Free: Noida Toll Company Moves Supreme Court Against Allahabad High Court
- British PM Theresa May Says Kashmir Is A Matter For India, Pakistan To Sort Out
- J&K: Students Suffer As Schools Along LOC Forced To Shut Amid Firing
The Congress Working Committee meeting on Monday could give its approval to the panel. Party leaders said there was a possibility that Rahul might offer to step down, but added that they would not let him.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh submitted his resignation on Saturday morning, describing his 10-year tenure as an “open book”. In a brief televised address to the nation, Singh thanked people for the “love and kindness” bestowed on him, an “underprivileged child of Partition”, and said he would never be able to repay the “debt” of being “empowered enough” to occupy the highest office.
The Congress panel looking into the party’s defeat could be on the lines of the A K Antony committee appointed after the 1999 elections. It had suggested several structural changes and looked into the issue of coalitions. Another committee under Pranab Mukherjee’s chairmanship had been set up to look into reasons for the Assembly poll debacle in four states in 2003.
“We must find out where things went wrong and then follow-up action must be taken,” senior Congress leader Satyavrat Chaturvedi said.
The Congress central leadership’s (read Rahul’s) “lethargic approach” on stitching up alliances in Tamil Nadu, Bihar and Telangana, and organisational weaknesses which resulted in failure to convey the party’s message effectively are being questioned openly now.
“DMDK chief Vijayakant came to Delhi and waited for a whole week, but no one bothered to talk to him. He is a force to reckon with in Tamil Nadu. What was the result? He went to the BJP,” K Jayakumar, an AICC secretary from Tamil Nadu, told The Sunday Express. He was among the 39 Congress candidates who lost in Tamil Nadu. The party didn’t win a single seat in the state.
“It was a blunder. It is the fault of the general secretary in charge of the state (Mukul Wasnik), he should have taken the initiative. Wasnik, I would say, was a total failure. It is because of our arrogance that we lost. We should have known the ground reality. We have just 10 per cent votes in Tamil Nadu,” he said.
Directly targeting the high command for the “insulting defeat”, Jayakumar added: “I don’t know what those people sitting at 15, Gurdwara Rakabganj Road, were doing. They should all be thrown out.” 15, Gurdwara Rakabganj Road, is known as the Congress war room.
The AICC leader further said that those party leaders who had not contested but “run away” should also be punished. “These leaders should not be allowed to hold any organisational post.”
Many party leaders also grumbled at the decision to set up an introspection committee. The need of the hour, they argued, were concrete corrective measures and out-of-the-box thinking. “We have to face crucial Assembly elections in two states this year. That will be our first test,” a senior leader said.
Haryana and Maharashtra — both Congress-ruled — will go to polls later this year. The Congress was routed in both the states on Friday.
Former Union minister Beni Prasad Verma, among those swept aside by the Modi wave in Uttar Pradesh, hit out at the state and Central leadership. “The RSS had been visiting villages across the state for the last two years and managed to built a cadre of youngsters. Cadre-building did not happen in the Congress. In fact, we did not do anything in the past six months,” he said.
Uttar Pradesh had been one of the priority states for Rahul.
Verma, who lost from Gonda, added, “The new generation has forgotten the Independence movement and the role played by Nehru, Gandhi and Patel. Did we do anything to remind them of their contributions?”
Haryana Congress president Ashok Tanwar admitted there was a mood for change, but insisted organisational weaknesses added to the rout. In a veiled attack on Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda, he said, “Congress workers were not heard and bureaucrats were running the show.”
Tanwar also claimed “sabotage” against several candidates. “Some leaders ensured that the Congress candidates got defeated. All this will be part of our report to the high command,” he said.
In Haryana, the Congress won only on seat, compared to 10 last time.