- The Big Picture: What’s AAP
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Bus from Burari laden with volunteers and hope
- Rare day out for AAP families
- Riot of support for AAP in communal hot spots
- Hunt on for CM house, will not accept Z-plus security
- No word from high command, Delhi Congress in a paralysis
- Latest News
- Second time at Ramlila Maidan: Hope overrides their doubts
- Kejriwal has no portfolio, will keep an eye on others
- In sea of white caps, BJP troika plans to be ‘forceful opposition’
- MP, MLA see Punjab as the next AAP stop
- A year later, the tweak: Desh to Dilli
- Arvind Kejriwal repeats his advice to sting the corrupt, asks police to act against ‘goondagardi’
- Proud that one of our volunteers has become Delhi CM: Anna Hazare
- Arvind Kejriwal not to keep any portfolio
- Now an Aam Aadmi Party Cola by beverage-maker inspired by Arvind Kejriwal’s party
- New chief minister Arvind Kejriwal holds meetings at Delhi Secretariat
- Cong’s Ajay Maken blames Sheila Dikshit for Delhi polls debacle
- Left, right, AAP
Nitish pays Modi back, statistic for statistic
Two days after Narendra Modi flashed data to show how much better his Gujarat is than Nitish Kumar’s Bihar, the latter hit back saying the former’s data is old and presenting his own figures to show that the comparison works the other way round.
“Such a person cannot take the country anywhere. He is talking of caste and community rather than the BJP slogan ‘India first’,” Nitish said in an hour-long press conference Wednesday to counter what Modi had said in Purnea Monday.
He said Modi’s data had made him laugh. “He mentioned either 2004 data and figures based on the 2001 census. He should have known that I took over as CM in November 2005,” Nitish said.
Backward Bihar cannot compare with Gujarat, he kept saying, yet he compared the two states’ growth rates, the extent to which either state had pulled people below the poverty line, and the rise in their respective literacy rates. Finding Bihar better in each case, he said, “We are a poor state, we cannot compare.” And he sought to match Modi’s claims about a humble background with his own, describing himself as a freedom fighter and Ayurveda practitioner’s son whose only fault was to challenge someone on principles.
He mocked Modi’s offer of a special status or package or attention for Bihar. “First, his dream to become PM will remain a dream. Bihar ka hak lad kar lenge, jhuk ke nahi lenge (We will get Bihar’s rights by fighting, not bowing)”.
Modi’s address had been targeted at Yadav and Kulhaiya Muslim voters. “While comparing milk prices in Gujarat and Bihar, he sought to appease a certain caste (Yadav, 13 per cent of Bihar’s population),” said Nitish, whose comparisons were focused largely on Muslims.
Nitish brought up the 2002 riots and cited the report of a Supreme Court committee, headed by N C Saxena, which found food and security inadequate for 30,000 people of 4,545 families in 81 relief camps. “Only five government or recognised schools were opened for children in these camps, with only four of them providing midday meals.”
Nitish matched that with madrasa teachers’ salary in Bihar, increased as per the Sixth Pay Commission recommendations. “I don’t know if Gujarat has done it,” said Nitish, adding 1,128 madrasas in Bihar are getting government grants. He said his government had made 51,000 Muslim women literate in four years, part of a scheme for women in the age group 18-35, and that his Hunar scheme had trained 13,768 Muslim girls in the first phase, and over 50,000 in the second phase.
Nitish went on to compare the states on education. Referring to Modi’s claim that 1,900 schools in Bihar are “running on paper”, he said schools without a building are running from community halls or private buildings.
Nitish said the school dropout rate in Gujarat is 58 per cent against the national 49. “Class I enrolment of Dalit students decreased 27 per cent in the last decade in Gujarat, while it increased 1 per cent nationally,” said Nitish, without giving a Bihar comparison.
He cited central figures to highlight a 34 per cent shortage of doctors in primary heath-care centres in Gujarat, absence of specialist doctors in 94 per cent of the community health centres, and the absence of a building for 19 per cent PHCs and 11 per cent CHCs. “A state that has been flaunting its development model cannot have such health infrastructure.”
On investment, he said, “Forty-two per cent of the investment coming to Gujarat between 1983 and 2010 was in chemicals and petrochemicals. In the last one decade, 58 per cent investment has gone to one region, Saurashtra. Is it not regional imbalance? And he talks of inclusive growth.”
He asked what the benefit of being a developed state is when employment has been static between 2007 and 2012. He referred to a 2007 study by an independent body, which he didn’t name, to say 34 per cent of over two lakh labourers in BT cotton are below 14 years of age in Gujarat.