Indian Express

Modi, a ‘potential accused’ in Tulsiram Prajapati murder case: Kapil Sibal

Sibal said it is clear from "circumstantial evidence" that Modi's office was fully in the know as to what was happening in "conspiracy to eliminate" Prajapati. Tweet This
Comments
"Modi is a potential accused. The circumstantial evidence is clear. We are wondering why the CBI has not arrested Parag Shah and why Modi has not been interrogated." Sibal said. "Modi is a potential accused. The circumstantial evidence is clear. We are wondering why the CBI has not arrested Parag Shah and why Modi has not been interrogated." Sibal said.

Stepping up offensive against Narendra Modi, Congress on Monday said he is a “potential accused” in the Tulsiram Prajapati murder case and should be interrogated by CBI, hours after the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate promised to cleanse the political system and Parliament of criminal elements.

Senior party leader and Union Law Minister Kapil Sibal also demanded the arrest and interrogation of Parag Shah, who was earlier working in the Gujarat CM’s office, claiming he had detailed talks with the police officer concerned who allegedly executed the murder of Prajapati.

“This evidence has come for the first time, which shows that the Chief Minister’s Office was directly involved in what was happening” with regard to the encounters, Sibal said, submitting call detail records of conversation between Parag with Rajkumar Pandian, who “planned and executed the murder of Prajapati”.

He said Parag, who was appointed Officer on Special Duty (IT) in Chief Minister’s Office was also “associated with cyber cell of the Anti Terrorist Squad. “Parag was also PA to senior BJP leader L K Advani from June to December 1998, when he was the Union Home Minister,” Sibal stated in the press note which, he said, also carries details of CBI charge sheet into the fake encounter cases.

“There can hardly be any doubt that the Chief Minister must have been aware of the Prajapati encounter carried out by the police officers working in the ATS led by DIG DG Vanzara,” he said.

Sibal said it is clear from the “circumstantial evidence” that Modi’s office was fully in the know as to what was happening in the “conspiracy to eliminate” Prajapati in the fake encounter that took place December 26, 2006.

“Modi is a potential accused. The circumstantial evidence is clear. We are wondering why the CBI has not arrested Parag Shah and why Modi has not been interrogated. The nation needs to know. The CBI needs to answer. Courts in India should ensure that a proper investigation takes place with the interrogation and arrest of Parag Shah and the summoning of Modi for interrogation,” he said.

Sibal also quoted remarks of Vanzara in his resignation letter to buttress the point that the chief minister was aware of the whole incident.

“We being field officers have simply implemented the conscious policy of this government which was inspiring, guiding and monitoring our actions from very close quarters,” he quoted Vanzara as saying.

Sibal said Prajapati was “required to be eliminated” because he was the only witness in the abduction of Sohrabuddin and Kauser Bi. “His testimony as a witness would have directly implicated all the accused,” he said.

“Hence it was plan continued…

comments powered by Disqus