Jaitley isn’t VK Singh’s defence minister; backs Dalbir Singh’s appointment as the next army chief

Singh attacked Army chief designate Dalbir Singh, accusing him of trying to protect a unit that "kills innocents," and "does dacoity".

By: Express News Service | New Delhi | Updated: June 12, 2014 2:17 am
Jaitley dismissed MoS V K Singh’s statement accusing Dalbir Singh of protecting a unit that “kills innocents”. ( Express Photo by Prem Nath Pandey )

A day after its Minister of State V K Singh accused the Army Chief designate of protecting a unit that “kills innocents” and “does dacoity”, the government on Wednesday made it clear that it does not support his attack, reiiterating that the appointment of Lt Gen Dalbir Singh as the next chief is final.

Responding to the uproar in parliament over V K Singh’s remarks, Defence Minister Arun Jaitley said the government “fully defends the appointment” of Dalbir Singh. “The UPA government had made the appointment of the next Army Chief some weeks ago. It’s been a practice in this country that we keep some issues outside the realm of inter-party politics… not only the government, but all of us must keep the Army and its appointments out of this arena and stand by the appointment. The present government also is fully defending that appointment,” said Jaitley.

In a direct attack on Dalbir Singh, V K Singh had tweeted on Tuesday: “If unit kills innocents, does dacoity and then head of organization tries to protect them, should he not be blamed? Criminals should go free!!”

His tweet came on the day that The Indian Express reported that the BJP-led government’s affidavit in the Supreme Court has termed V K Singh’s action as the then Army Chief against Dalbir Singh as “illegal”, “extraneous” and “premeditated”.

The government on Wednesday came under attack in both houses of Parliament with senior Congress leaders Amarinder Singh and Anand Sharma demanding the removal of V K Singh from the Council of Ministers for making “unacceptable and highly objectionable statements” on the “persona of the Army Chief designate”. “If a serving minister is making such a statement, the government ought to remove this minister. The Prime Minister must clarify this issue. It is unacceptable. He cannot continue in the government, he cannot be a member of the Council of Ministers,” Sharma said in the Rajya Sabha.

“Even after his own government has indicted him, the language used by him in a tweet is highly derogatory. To call the next Chief of Army Staff a criminal and those working under him in the forces dacoits is not acceptable. I hope the government will take note of this and he will be dismissed from the Council of Ministers immediately,” said Amarinder Singh in the Lok Sabha.

While he did not defend V K Singh’s comments, Jaitley said the matter should not be raised as it could prompt the minister to “consider defending himself”. “I would urge that this issue, directly, indirectly or even collaterally, may not be raised for the reason that if one of the major political parties chooses to attack a minister, then the minister may consider defending himself,” said Jaitley.

As first reported by The Indian Express, the Ministry of Defence, in an affidavit to the Supreme Court on Monday, defended Dalbir Singh’s promotion and described the disciplinary ban on him by V K Singh as Army Chief as “illegal”, “extraneous” and “premeditated”. It said the the disciplinary proceedings against Dalbir Singh between April and May 2012 by V K Singh was “without any basis or material on record”.

The government affidavit came in response to a petition by Lt Gen Ravi Dastane, who alleged favouritism in selection of Dalbir Singh as Army commander — making him next in line to succeed General Bikram Singh. In his last days in office in May 2012, V K Singh had effectively tried to block the appointment of Dalbir Singh as the Eastern Army Commander, whcih would have put him out of contention for the top post.

Jaitley isn’t VK Singh’s defence minister; backs Dalbir Singh’s appointment as the next army chief

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. B
    Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 am
    It looks like BJP has chosen not to block any of UPA initiative to look inclusive. I have a feeling that is very defensive in nature. And all the problems of this world has come because of defensive actions and reactions. BJP, you don't have to be extra inclusive because his have been saying you will be divisive. It's time to be correct.
  2. A
    Arun Gupta
    Jun 11, 2014 at 7:28 am
    Strange are the ways of politics. He may be totally wrong but always love the enemy's enemy.
  3. A
    Anil Gudhekar
    Jun 12, 2014 at 2:03 am
    Actually UPA Govt must not have to appoint him as they r outgoing Govt.
  4. A
    Anil Gudhekar
    Jun 12, 2014 at 2:17 am
    There must be law for All appointmet from Out going Govt. must be cancelled when New Govt. is form. & for Post like Military chief such before dissolution they must not have to appoint.
  5. A
    arun kumar
    Jun 11, 2014 at 7:05 am
    The govt is showing signs of internal dissent since it ahs just begun functioning. Too early rather. Ministers tweeting against their own govt decisions! How far will it go in this govt. This is the first one. Many more to come yet.
  6. D
    Dinesh Singh
    Jun 11, 2014 at 5:00 pm
    Mr. Jaitley by siding with tainted General designate (Suhag) has given impression that uprooting corruption is not on the main agenda of his ministry. They will maintain status quo by not rocking the boat of those involved in unethical practices. Gen V K Singh and likes of Kiran Bedi may be in for rude shock.
  7. D
    Dharam pal
    Jun 11, 2014 at 5:07 pm
    This was a reaction to MOD filing an affidavit indicting VK Singh. The General had to defend himself. Most erudite statement has come from Mr. Jaitely. The controversy should now rest in the interest of the country.
  8. G
    Jun 11, 2014 at 6:30 pm
    why, o why, pray tell me, is a former general no army officer openly or privately ever calls corrupt or inept, bearing the cross of dishonour, whilst his inglorious predecessors have flats in adarsh and are governors?
  9. Load More Comments