Pakistan terror safe haven, Lashkar and Jaish move freely: US administration

This is one of the key takeaways from the US State Department’s ‘Country Report on Terrorism 2016’ to the US Congress. After perusing the report, Indian government sources said the segments on South and Central Asia “vindicate India’s longstanding position on the menace of cross-border terrorism in our region”.

Written by Shubhajit Roy | New Delhi | Updated: July 20, 2017 9:04 am
Lahore High Court Hafiz Saeed Detention Case, Lahore HC Hafiz Saeed, Hafiz Saeed, Saeed Detention Case, Hafiz Saeed Detention Case, Pakistan terror groups, LeT, terror groups, Pakistan News, Indian Express, Indian Express News Jamaat-ud Dawah chief and LeT founder, Hafiz Saeed. (file photo)

Identifying Pakistan as one of the “terrorist safe havens”, the US administration under President Donald Trump on Wednesday said that Islamabad did not take sufficient action against “externally focused groups” like Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad in 2016, which “continued to operate, train, organise and fundraise in Pakistan”.

This is one of the key takeaways from the US State Department’s ‘Country Report on Terrorism 2016’ to the US Congress — the first submitted by the Trump administration. It follows a similar submission by US intelligence officials to US Congress committees a few months ago.

After perusing the report, Indian government sources said the segments on South and Central Asia “vindicate India’s longstanding position on the menace of cross-border terrorism in our region”.

“Numerous terrorist groups, including the Haqqani Network (HQN), Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), continued to operate from Pakistani soil in 2016. Although LeT is banned in Pakistan, LeT’s wings Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Falah-i-Insaniat Foundation (FiF) were able to openly engage in fundraising, including in the capital. LeT’s chief Hafiz Saeed (a UN-designated terrorist) continued to address large rallies, although in February 2017, Pakistan proscribed him under relevant provisions of Schedule Four of the Anti-Terrorism Act, thus severely restricting his freedom of movement,” said the report released on Wednesday night.

“The Pakistani government did not publicly reverse its December 2015 declaration that neither JuD nor FiF is banned in Pakistan, despite their listing under UN sanctions regimes, although in January 2017, Pakistan placed both organisations ‘under observation’, pursuant to Schedule Two of the Anti-Terrorism Act. While not a ban, this allows the government to closely scrutinise the activities of both organisations,” it said.

On November 11, Pakistan’s National Counterterrorism Authority published its own list of banned organisations, which placed JuD in a separate section for groups “under observation” but not banned, it added.

“Pakistan did not take sufficient action against other externally focused groups, such as Lashkar-e-Tayyiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad in 2016, which continued to operate, train, organise, and fundraise in Pakistan… Groups located in Pakistan, but focused on conducting attacks outside the country, included the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani Network (HQN), Lashkar e-Tayyiba (LeT), and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM),” it said.

The report said the Pakistan government did not take any significant action against LeT or JeM, other than implementing an ongoing ban on media coverage of their activities. It said the 2015 ban on media coverage of Saeed, JuD and FiF continued, and was generally followed by broadcast and print media. “LeT and JeM continued to hold rallies, raise money, recruit, and train in Pakistan,” it said.

It also said that Indian and US leaders directed officials to identify new areas of collaboration, through the July US-India Counterterrorism Joint Working Group, applauded finalisation of a bilateral arrangement to facilitate the sharing of terrorism screening information, and called upon Pakistan to bring the perpetrators of terrorist attacks against India to justice.

“The trial of seven suspects in the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attack remained stalled, with many witnesses for the prosecution remaining to be called by the court. The lead defendant, alleged LeT operational commander Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, remained free on bail,” said the report.

It also said that progress remained slow on regulating madrasas, blocking extremist messaging, empowering the National Counter Terrorism Authority, cutting off terrorist financing and strengthening the judicial system.

Pakistan is a member of the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering, a Financial Action Task Force (FATF)-style regional body. Pakistan criminalises terrorist financing through the ATA. “However, there has not been a significant number of prosecutions or convictions of terrorist financing cases reported by Pakistan in recent years due to a lack of resources and capacity within investigative and judicial bodies,” it said.

“In 2015, FATF removed Pakistan from its review process due to progress on countering the financing of terrorism. In October 2016, FATF noted concern among members that Pakistan’s outstanding gaps in the implementation of the UN Security Council ISIL (Da’esh) and al-Qa’ida sanctions regime had not been resolved, and that UN-listed entities — including LeT and its branches — were not being effectively prohibited from raising funds in Pakistan. Despite Pakistan’s CFT laws, its freezing of several relevant bank accounts from March 2015 to March 2016, and other limited efforts to stem fundraising by LeT, the group and its wings continued to make use of economic resources and raise funds in the country in 2016. Pakistan’s ban on media coverage also did not appear to reduce the ability of LeT to collect donations,” said the report.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Sam
    Jul 20, 2017 at 11:56 pm
    India cannot wait on US to help on terror. This Islamic terror from Pakistan was created with US money and training. US still helps the government with billions in free money.
    Reply
    1. S
      Sankaran Krishnan
      Jul 20, 2017 at 4:25 pm
      With the exception of the so called "B" nation China all other Countries will accept that Pakistan is an Terror Nation and also supports Terror acts that operates from their soil and US Govt. State Department Report confirms the same is nothing but a straight slap on the face of China and as well Pakistan. Why not USA imposes sanctions based on their own Report which will make them to change their stance once they face the cash crunch and if other Countries also follow suit they are forced to act against Terror, is it NOT ???
      Reply
      1. R
        Raju
        Jul 20, 2017 at 1:18 pm
        Everyone agrees that any form of violence committed in the name of religion is a bad thing,” “It is another thing altogether to insist that every form of ‘religious extremism’ is an inherently bad thing. This would be to assume that every religion, at its foundation, is essentially the same and that the greatest danger to the world is when humans take their Radical religion communist principles and theory seriously.
        Reply
        1. B
          Bharat
          Jul 20, 2017 at 12:50 pm
          USA teaches how to defeat nations by terror as they did in afghanistan to defeat USSR. Iraq Libya Syria yemen are facing US sponsored terrorism. USA is master of all covert operations. It has provided weapons to all non state actors. The day USA desire world peace, it can do easily.
          Reply
          1. D
            Dasari
            Jul 20, 2017 at 12:46 pm
            By encouraging terrorist organizations ISI/Pak Military is already wellknown internationally as tacit terror supporters. China has already put the hefty investments made in CPEC which are converted into loans under which Pakistani economy which is already in doldrums, will crumble and China will own Pakistan soon or later which is of concern to India. Foolish rulers of Pakistan are enriching themselves in the name of religion and the Pak military will crush any uprising against the Government by people as can be seen by their repression in POK/Gilgit-Baltistan/Balochistan. Sooner or later Balochistan will be separate from Pakistan. Pakistani rulers are happy to fuel trouble in Kashmir through support to terror organizations but are blind to their own future with Chinese bosses who are fleecing Pakistan through trade and now CPEC. Dismemberment of Pakistan is very much in offing and no one can stop, except perhaps India, if Pakistan makes amends to relationship with India.
            Reply
            1. L
              lafanga
              Jul 20, 2017 at 11:53 am
              According to US, any Muslim country not buying weapons from them is a terrorist safe haven. Any Muslim country not doing their bidding is a terrorist safe haven. And last but not least, when US cannot win a war, it blames one of the neighbouring countries like Cambodia for Vietnam, Iran for Iraq and now Pakistan for Afghanistan. Nothing new in all of this.
              Reply
              1. M
                Michelle:Vedic:human
                Jul 20, 2017 at 11:40 am
                The Prophet Muhammad practiced THIGHING on his Child-Bride, Aisha Mohammed practiced on a female child and who began this evil practice. According to an official Fatwa issued in Saudi Arabia, the prophet Muhammad began to practice thighing his child-bride, Aisha when she was six years old until she reached nine years of age,The hadith, which was quoted earlier, mentioned Muhammad started performing literal s-e-x with Aisha ONLY when she reached the age of nine,Muslim scholars collectively agree, by virtue of divine example, a child becomes an adult, available for se-x-ual intercourse as soon as she reaches the age of nine,the Shari’a allows any of the faithful to marry a six-year old child.According to the fatwa-31409, Sahih al-Bukhari,-book 62, Hadith no.89,---Jai hind.
                Reply
                1. M
                  Michelle:Vedic:human
                  Jul 20, 2017 at 11:34 am
                  prophet Muhammad could not have s-e-x with his fiancée, Aisha when she was six due to her small size and age,the fatwa said that at age six, he would put his p-en-is between her thighs and massage gently because he did not want to harm her. Imagine a man of fifty-one removing the clothes of a six-year-old girl and slipping his erect pe-n-is between her thighs, rubbing her until he ejaculated and his se-me-n ran down her thighs, To this day, this is considered a benevolent act on the part of the adult male “not wanting to harm her.” What harm could be inflicted upon a young girl mentally and emotionally if not a grown man showing her his pe-ni-s and str pp-ing her of her clothes and rubbing his male organ between her legs?--Sahih al-Bukhari,--book 62,-hadith no.89,--fatwa 31409---Jai hind.
                  Reply
                  1. Load More Comments