Opposed to any third-party involvement in resolving Sino-India border disputes: China

"We are trying to seek a solution through negotiations that is acceptable to both sides. Under such circumstances, parties should respect such aspects and any third party should not be involved in efforts to resolve disputes," Hua Chunying said.

By: PTI | Beijing | Updated: September 15, 2017 7:23 pm
China, india-china border, Sino-India border disputes, sino-India border, indo-japan ties, Shinzo Abe, Narendra Modi, Hua hoped that close ties between India and Japan is conducive to the regional peace and stability. (Source: PTI Photo)

China on Friday said it is opposed to any foreign investments including that from Japan in India’s North East region and is against any third party’s involvement in resolving its border disputes with India. Reacting to Japan’s plans to step up investments in the northeastern states during Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s visit to India, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told the media that China is opposed to any foreign investment in the “disputed areas”.

“You also mentioned Act East policy. You must be clear that the boundary of India and China border area has not been totally delimited. We have disputes on the eastern section of the boundary,” she said.

“We are now trying to seek a solution through negotiations that is acceptable to both sides. Under such circumstances, various parties should respect such aspects and any third party should not be involved in our efforts to resolve the disputes,” she said.

China claims Arunachal Pradesh as southern Tibet.

Hua said there was no mention of China anywhere in the India-Japan joint statement nor she has seen any “innuendoes” referred to Beijing as stated by the media.

“To be frank we are also closely following the Japanese Prime Minister’s visit to India. I read the joint statement carefully but I have not found the statement mentioned the term China at all,” she said.

About the references to Indo-Pacific, which included South China Sea in the joint statement and calls for the countries to resolve the disputes peacefully, she said the statement mentioned disputes to be resolved through dialogue.

“We know that to resolve the disputes the directly concerned parties have to uphold the rights to freedom of navigation, over flights entitled to countries under international law. This is China’s position,” she said.

In indirect reference to Japan, she said, “We also hope various parties can uphold the rights to freedom of navigation of over flights by countries in various waters.”

China and Japan have dispute over the uninhabited islands called Senkakus by Japan and Diaoyu islands by China in the East China Sea where naval ships of both the countries aggressively patrol the waters around the islands.

About the connectivity projects, and implicit criticism of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), Hua said, “I haven’t seen any innuendoes. I have not seen that”.

Hua hoped that close ties between India and Japan is conducive to the regional peace and stability.

“I should also add that the India and Japan are important countries in Asia. We hope the normal development of the relationship can be conducive to regional, peace and development and play a constructive role in this process,” she said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. S
    Sri
    Sep 16, 2017 at 3:25 am
    Who cares about communist country concerns. Do they care about indias concern on their pak investment in kashmir. why pres ues giving importance?
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. M
      mtv
      Sep 16, 2017 at 12:07 am
      A typical Communist and Fascist mentality of China! Given power, all these communists, fascists and dictators behave same. They will do lot of damage to their country and people also the world. Ultimately, they will be defeated, but at a heavy cost to others. Same fate await Modi (a fascst and a would be dictator) and Pinarayi Vijayan (a communist and would be dictator) !
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. S
        Shivan
        Sep 16, 2017 at 12:05 am
        Then, get the CPEC out of Pakistan occupied Jammu and Kashmir which is an integral part of India
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. B
          Bharat
          Sep 15, 2017 at 11:55 pm
          If China can make investments in POK, which is DISPUTED, than India has all rights to to make invetments in AP with Japan's help. Xi should learn---Whatever is Good for Pakis and China is Good for India and Japan also.
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. Venkataraman Jagadesan
            Sep 15, 2017 at 11:31 pm
            Who the are the chinese to tell us as to how Japan should invest? The dragon deserves a kick in their butt. The dragon will have to be kept at a long distance and it should not be allowed to come anywhere near our border. Jai HInd.
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments