Nirbhaya gangrape case 2012: A look at what all has happened over the years

Nirbhaya gangrape case: From protests in New Delhi to the trial - a look at all that has happened since December 2012.

By: Express Web Desk | New Delhi | Updated: May 5, 2017 3:02 pm
nirbhaya gangrape, nirbhaya gangrape case, nirbhaya rape case, nirbhaya judgement, december 16 gangrape, delhi gangrape case, supreme court The trial court had in September 2013 awarded death sentences to the convicts. (Source: File)

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld the death sentence to the convicts in the Nirbhaya gangrape case. In 2012, the nation was shaken up by the news of a dastardly gangrape of a 23-year-old in a moving bus in the national capital. Late on a Sunday night on December 16, 2012, the victim along with her male companion were returning from a screening of the film Life of Pi in Saket. Both of them were waiting to hail an auto rickshaw for a ride back home at around 9.30 pm. Around this time, an off-duty charter bus driven by people not driving for commercial reasons passed them and offered to give them a ride to Dwarka from Munirka. Soon, the victim’s companion noticed the route taken by the driver was different than normal and the doors of the bus had been tightly shut.

When he objected to it, the bus occupants raised fingers at the boy and the girl saying why were they out at night so late. At this point, a scuffle ensued between the victim and her companion and the other occupants of the bus, which ultimately resulted in a bloody fight and the gang rape. The two victims were thrown out of the bus in half clothed and bloodied state. A passerby found them at 11 pm and rushed them to Safdurjang hospital where they were given immediate treatment. The victim remained in a critical condition until her death on December 29, in Singapore where she had been taken for further treatment. Her companion survived after being treated for a few broken ribs.

nirbhaya gangrape, nirbhaya gangrape case, delhi gangrape case, 2012 delhi gangrape case, nirbhaya rape case, nirbhaya judgement, december 16 gangrape, delhi gangrape case, supreme court The Munirka Bus stand from where the horrific tale started. in New Delhi. Express Photo By Amit Mehra

The victim

The victim was born and brought up in Delhi while her parents are from a village in the Ballia district of Uttar Pradesh. She was a physiotherapy intern. Her father had sold ancestral land in order to help her continue her education. Her male companion, Awindra Pratap Pandey, was a software engineer from Gorakhpur.

The protests

The incident, when reported, triggered massive protests throughout the country. On December 21, 2012, public protests took place at India Gate and Raisina Hills. Thousands of people reached to protest with the protesters clashing with police and being deterred by water cannon and tear gas shells. They were also baton charged and some were arrested. Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev and former Army chief General Vijay Kumar Singh too were a part of these protests.

In order to prevent further protests, the police closed down seven metro stations, restricted the roads leading to India Gate. Curfew was imposed around Rashtrapati Bhawan along with CrPC Section 144 to avoid large gatherings of people.

The incident evoked reactions from politicians as well, with the then leader of Opposition Sushma Swaraj demanding death by hanging for the rapists. Then chief minister of Delhi Sheila Dikshit had described Delhi as the “rape capital” in many interviews and said she did not have the heart to meet the victim or her family.

nirbhaya gangrape, nirbhaya gangrape case, delhi gangrape case, 2012 delhi gangrape case, nirbhaya rape case, nirbhaya judgement, december 16 gangrape, delhi gangrape case, supreme court City peoples hold a candle light tribute to Nirbhya on the ocassion of Nirbhya rape anniversary at gandhi statue in Lucknow on Tuesday. Express Photo by Vishal Srivastava. 16.12.2014.

Akhilesh Yadav announced a fund for the victim’s family, giving them a government job along with Rs 2 million.

Justice Verma Commission

Six days after the incident, a judicial committee headed by former Chief Justice of India JS Verma was constituted by the central government to amend laws that dealt with rape to provide sterner ways to punish such crimes. The committee submitted a report in 29 days after it received 80,000 suggestions for amendments to rape laws from many citizens including jurists, lawyers, NGOs and women’s groups. The committee’s suggestions covered an ambit of offences that weren’t included in the law before among other suggestions.

It recommended inclusion of stalking, voyeurism and intentional touching as an offence. It also recommended more stringent punishments for rapists and recommended the addition of the definition of “gang rape” in the law. The committee also recommended making marital rape a punishable offence. It added other suggestions like gender sensitisation, police and electoral reforms, and also a Bill of Rights. The committee also suggested a review of the way the medical examination of rape victim was conducted.

Nirbhaya Fund

The Government of India announced the Rs 1000 crore Nirbhaya Fund in 2013. These funds were aimed at supporting NGOs and other initiatives that aid in gender sensitisation and ensure safety of women. The phrase “Nirbhaya Fund” came after the word Nirbhaya was given to the victim as a pseudonym in order to not use her real identity, which was leaked in the media.

nirbhaya gangrape, nirbhaya gangrape case, delhi gangrape case, 2012 delhi gangrape case, nirbhaya rape case, nirbhaya judgement, december 16 gangrape, delhi gangrape case, supreme court The victim’s parents Asha Devi and Badrinath. Express Photo/Prem Nath Pandey

Arrests and Trial

Based on the statements given by Awindra Pratap Pandey, the Delhi Police filed charges against five adult men for rape, murder, and kidnapping. The juvenile in the case was tried by the Juvenile Justice Board, was found guilty and served three years in a remand home. He was released in 2015. One of the adults accused, Ram Singh, died while in prison during the trial. The other four adults accused were found guilty by a trial court on September 10, 2013.

They contested the judgment in the High Court which confirmed the death sentence awarded to all four. They then appealed to the Supreme Court, which stayed their death sentence allowing them to file an appeal. The court today will announce its verdict on whether the death sentence will be upheld or not. The order is expected at about 2 pm.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. D
    Diya
    May 11, 2017 at 9:41 am
    we don't believe its like 4.5 years passed but our government is still waiting to take decision. I don't know about other polition but we believe in Mr. Modi and he has to do some thing for our Bharat. Requesting him to p some law like fast track so that every one should have a lesson who is taking for-granted the low and rules in Bharat. This is not a matter of boy or girl it for our Bharat. we feel so bad when we travel in other country. people are afraid to visit our country. no one allow girls to go outside after 8 o clock in Delhi basically .why girl need dad or brother or friend to go out why they can not live her life as they want.why every time girls give prof for any miss hipping or why the ignored by people . I know no have reply of these questions but ask any girl or women every single women is just managing her life to run her family or relationship.
    (2)(0)
    Reply
    1. G
      Gopal
      May 5, 2017 at 10:25 pm
      Notice how the higher courts are at the heart of the dysfunction in our legal system. The criminals were arrested in 2 days, the lower courts gave a judgement within 1 year – even the delay was caused by the Supreme Court halting the trial on a ridiculous PIL which had no standing in this case. The case sat on the docket of the Supreme Court for 4 years, while the court wasted time on ru s ranging from Sardar jokes to the sanc y of the Geeta. Even now, as we celebrate, the case is not over. The accused can ask for two further reviews by the court. The mercy pe ion will also be reviewed by the courts. None of the last few recourses are provided by law or the cons ution but created out of thin air by our courts who have no regard for victims of crime. The juvenile who was the key responsible individual has already been freed and even promised a job by AAP (don't know what actually happened). Is it any doubt that our legal system is complicity with criminals?
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. A
        Arvind
        May 6, 2017 at 2:13 pm
        It is good that justice has been done. But I don't think that judiciary was anywhere at fault. Do you know that India has nearly 23,000 judges (including all high courts, all district courts and supreme court) for more than 2.65 crores pending cases. China which has a comparable population has more than 2.1 lac judges. In India a district Court judge has to go through even more than 25 cases in a day which I think is not an easy task. Without thoroughly studying a case justice cannot be delivered. This is not an objective exam. Problem lies in the lack of judges which is delaying the w process.
        (0)(0)
        Reply
      2. C
        Citizen
        May 5, 2017 at 7:46 pm
        A strong message to all who dare to do such barbaric things Jaihind
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. D
          Dheeraj
          May 5, 2017 at 5:58 pm
          Happy to hear such a news, but the court took 4-5 to decide it. government is too casual in India. they should be punished at the earliest so that people should have fear in doing such activities. they should also understand that they too have their sister, wife, mother, etc. or the simplest thing to hand over the criminal to the general public.
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. Rakesh Kumar Dash
            May 5, 2017 at 5:34 pm
            All the punishment is less for those busted, but anyway the decision is satisfactory. Still thinking about that so called minor, i m spotting blood.
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments