• Associate Sponsor

Ajmer Dargah blast case: NIA to examine order setting Aseemanand, others free

Prosecutor says sufficient evidence against accused in Ajmer dargah blast case.

Written by Rahul Tripathi | New Delhi | Updated: March 10, 2017 10:19 am
Swami Aseemanand, Swami Aseemanand acquitted, NIA Ajmer Dargarh blast case, 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast case, NIA Swami Aseemanand, Ashwini Sharma, RSS Ajmer Dargarh blast case, india news Swami Aseemanand

A day after a special court acquitted Swami Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 Ajmer Dargah blast case, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) said it will examine the order of the court. Public prosecutor Ashwini Sharma told The Indian Express that there was “sufficient” evidence against Aseemanand and others. On Wednesday, the special NIA court convicted three persons, including two who identified as “RSS pracharaks” in court records, but acquitted seven others.

Watch What Else Is Making News

Associated with the trial since its start, Sharma said: “The prosecution case failed as 29 key witnesses out of 149 turned hostile during the trial. Among the hostile witnesses, many of them recorded their statements before a magistrate under section 164 of CrPC but later retracted saying they gave statement under duress.”

“We will wait until March 16 for the court to pronounce the quantum of sentence before taking any decision,” Sharma said.

The NIA said it was yet to receive the copy of the court order and will decide once it goes through the judgment. Besides Aseemanand, who ran the RSS-backed Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, the others acquitted were Harshad Solanki, Chandrashekhar Leve, Mukesh Vasani, Lokesh Sharma, Mehul alias Mafat Bhai alias Maheshbhai Gohil and Bharat Mohan Lal Ratishwar. Devendra Gupta and Sunil Joshi (who was killed in December 2007) were held guilty, along with Bhavesh Patel, under Sections 120B and 295 A of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 15,16 and 18 of the UAPA Act.

Aseemanand, who was arrested after a long chase in 2010, had confessed before the CBI and later NIA about his role in leading, planning and helping the execution of several blasts targeting minorities across India “to avenge attacks on Hindu temples”. Though Aseemanand later retracted his confession, the NIA chargesheeted him in three cases — Ajmer, Samjhauta Express and Mecca Masjid (Hyderabad) blasts.

He was granted bail in Samjhauta case by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in August 2014. Trial in the Mecca Masjid case began only one-and-half months ago. In all these cases, Aseemanand has been accused of taking part in conspiracy meetings and being the key motivator of the group that executed the blasts. The blast at the shrine of Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti in Ajmer on October 11, 2007 killed three people and injured 17 others.

The case was first investigated by the Rajasthan ATS, and transferred to the NIA in 2011. The NIA filed three supplementary chargesheets, besides the original one filed by the ATS.

According to the NIA’s chargesheets, Bhavesh Patel, a resident of Bharuch in Gujarat, had made over a dozen calls to Joshi in the run-up to the blast. The special court will pronounce the quantum of the sentence after hearing arguments from both sides on March 16. The court also imposed of Rs 1 lakh each on Devendra Gupta and Bhavesh Patel.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Bipin Bhardwaj
    Mar 10, 2017 at 8:12 am
    All terrorists, rapists, murderer will be set free after shouting Bharat Mata Ki jai, Akhand Bharat, Muslims main enemies and spread hatred against minoritis, attack women, follow Manu i.e educated from a RSS shakha. Judiciary, laws, consution belongs to all anti nationals
    1. A
      Afzal Ahmad
      Mar 10, 2017 at 7:06 pm
      One should not be surprised with the judgment. It is on expected lines because like in politics, even the criminal law being followed in our country is different for majority and minority communities. Only a few days back the apex court observed in case of Mr. Advani who is deeply involved in Babri Masjid demolition case and pulled the CBI for its inaction. What more proof is required for the biased action when our supreme judicial insution has observed this? Remember, Special public prosecutor Rohini Salian’s statement that she was asked, soon after the NDA government came to power, to go soft in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, where the accused are members of Hindu extremist groups, points to a long-standing problem of politicization of the Indian criminal justice system:. Prosecution is not so much a professional process as a political one. lt;br/gt;India cannot prosper as a democracy when the rule of law is arbitrary and capricious. Investigative and prosecution agencies cannot be allowed to be influenced by the prejudices of the ruling party
      1. D
        Deeply Concerned
        Mar 10, 2017 at 5:10 am
        When the govt public prosecutor sees enough evidence to hold this terrorist, why and how and who are involved in the subotage of justice
        1. I
          Mar 11, 2017 at 2:42 pm
          Let Pak bring 26/11 perpetrators to justice before pointing at Aseemanand. They have turned Blind-eye on Truck Load of evidence on involvement of Lakvi etc. in 26/11 killings.