Muslim personal law conflicts with POCSO, says Delhi court, allows marriage of minor girl

Judge acquits 18-yr-old married to 15-yr-old whose mother complained

Written by Kaunain Sheriff M | New Delhi | Updated: March 21, 2017 10:38 am
muslim personal law, POCSO, minor girl married, POCSO act, Section 6 POCSO, india news The court said that “at no point of time the accused had ever used any kind of force against the prosecutrix.” (Representational/Express Photo)

IF a Muslim youth “elopes” with a minor girl and marries her under the Muslim personal law and the minor “resides with him as his wife,” can he be treated as an “offender” of having committed sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO)? Raising this question, a special court in Delhi observed last week that there is “clear conflict” between Muslim personal law and provisions of POCSO. Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav, acquitting an 18-year-old man who was married to a 15-year-old minor – both Muslims — and faced charges of rape, kidnapping and under sections of POCSO Act, said that as per POCSO, the minor girl was a “child not capable of giving consent for her marriage and consummation thereof” but “her personal law clearly authorises her to go ahead and get married at that age”. The youth was also accused under Section 6 of POCSO — punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault.

“Therefore, a clear conflict is apparent between the Muslim Personal Law and the provisions of the Act with regard to the marriage of a Muslim girl. The Act treats her as a child not capable of giving consent for her marriage and consummation thereof whereas her personal law clearly authorises her to go ahead and get married at that age. The Parliament probably did not foresee the aforesaid issue,” ASJ Yadav said.

In the present case, an FIR was filed under sections of POCSO Act based on a complaint by the girl’s mother who said that the boy had enticed her daughter and taken her away.

The police then slapped charges of rape, kidnapping and sexual assault under the POCSO Act. After the victim recorded her statement before the magistrate, the victim did not go with the parent and was, instead, sent to Nirmal Chhaya, a children’s home in Delhi.

“Before proceeding to analyze the rival contentions, it has to be borne in mind that the accused as well as the prosecutrix are Muslims. It is a fact that under the Muslim Personal law with which the accused and prosecutrix are governed permits them to contract a valid marriage provided the prosecutrix had attained the age of puberty. The prosecutrix had definitely attained puberty, as is evident from her MLC which shows that she had her last menstrual period 20-25 days back,” the court stated.

The court further said that POCSO Act was enacted “with the objective that the children of tender age are not abused and their childhood and youth are protected against exploitation” and that they are “given facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in condition of freedom and dignity”.

The court said that “at no point of time the accused had ever used any kind of force against the prosecutrix.”

“If, everything had happened with the sweet will of the prosecutrix then can the accused be held guilty of committing sexual assault upon her in the teeth of the admission made by the prosecutrix as well as the accused?”

“In the present case also, the element of ‘taking away’ or ‘enticement’ is found to be lacking. In view of the material on record, it appears that prosecutrix was willing and consenting party and it seems that everything had happened with her sweet will. In these circumstances, the factum of kidnapping of prosecutrix does not stand proved. If the law laid down in the aforesaid authorities is applied to the facts of the present case, then it would be absolutely clear that the accused is not on the wrong side of law in the matter,” the court added.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. M
    Monothiest
    Mar 21, 2017 at 2:06 am
    Clearly, POSCO needs to be updated. All major religions of the world, including Islam, Christianity, Judaism, describes puberty as the eligibility criteria for getting legally married as per will. Hats off to the judge being objective and making the judgement in true spirit of the POSCO law.
    Reply
    1. H
      Hindustani
      Mar 21, 2017 at 3:49 am
      By her legal marriagable age, she would have 3 muslim children for islam and instantly divorced im 3 seconds.lt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;If muslim want to follow 4 wives, instant male authority to replace a wife, do child marriages to elder male as per their QURAN THEN CRIMINAL SENTENCING LAWS AS PER QURAN TOO SHOULD BE FOLLEDlt;br/gt;lt;br/gt;PUBLIC FLOGGING, LIMB CHOPPING AND CHOP CHOP SQUARE AS IN SAUDI ARABIA SHOULD BE STRICTLY FOLLOWED. AT LEAST IT WILL BRING FOREIGN TOURISTS.
      Reply
      1. H
        Hindustani
        Mar 21, 2017 at 3:29 am
        The judge is saying that if he had married 3 years old or 6 years, violation of Child Protection laws but OK PER HIM AND QURAN
        Reply
        1. P
          Piyush
          Mar 21, 2017 at 4:57 am
          Abolish this personal laws...it is inhumane to let minors marry
          Reply
          1. P
            PG
            Mar 21, 2017 at 3:25 am
            What kind of judges, we now have?!! Kids at 15 are supposed to be in school... Not rearing kids themselves. On one hand, these same fellows come and decide on the height of Dahi Handi pyramid, but does nothing, when they see kids life start rotting.
            Reply
            1. S
              Sat
              Mar 21, 2017 at 5:23 am
              how did this fellow become a judge
              Reply
              1. V
                vijay
                Mar 21, 2017 at 3:51 am
                Does this mean that muslim citizen of India are free to give succor to ISIS and other terrorists on citing their obligation to help fellow muslims. It is hightime that this country is run by two statues. No other country in this world has different laws for different religion.
                Reply
                1. B
                  Balaji
                  Mar 21, 2017 at 8:19 am
                  Uniform civil code is required as long as country and citizens are concerned. Civil code should be formulated in such a way so that it will contain all the good things from each religion. Country and consution first and then personal Religion.
                  Reply
                  1. I
                    IslamForFoools
                    Mar 21, 2017 at 12:36 am
                    This is the reason why we need to get rid off shariah filth. Judge is just saying what dead Rajiv hi inflicted into our consution before he was slaughtered like. Apeeg
                    Reply
                    1. I
                      imtiyaz
                      Mar 21, 2017 at 8:47 am
                      how about hindus marying hindus n muslims marrying muslims....n divorce.....u realy are idot
                      Reply
                      1. A
                        Antony
                        Mar 21, 2017 at 4:27 am
                        There must a uniform civil code . Modi now has UP in hand . change the laws quickly and introduce uniform civilcode for all the communities and also compulsory two child policy for all indians! UP bhayas are m producing and we are on the verge of potion explosion!!!!
                        Reply
                        1. G
                          ganesh Mishra
                          Mar 21, 2017 at 4:26 am
                          There is no conflict and law of land is always maintainable. Muslim personal Law is always seconded and has no stand against the common law.
                          Reply
                          1. G
                            Gopal
                            Mar 21, 2017 at 4:24 am
                            Notice how our "secularists" have communialized the law.
                            Reply
                            1. S
                              SK Gupta
                              Mar 21, 2017 at 1:22 am
                              Throw the Judge in jail. Obviously he has taken money to write such a ridiculous judgment!!!
                              Reply
                              1. M
                                Manas Ranjan
                                Mar 21, 2017 at 3:35 am
                                Inst
                                Reply
                                1. j
                                  jaihind101
                                  Mar 21, 2017 at 3:38 am
                                  Islam is religion of terrorists criminals and barbarian Quran is manual for terrorists
                                  Reply
                                  1. C
                                    chauhan
                                    Mar 21, 2017 at 8:23 am
                                    indian courts follow indian consution so should give judgement accordingly
                                    Reply
                                    1. R
                                      Ramakrishnan
                                      Mar 21, 2017 at 1:14 am
                                      The judge should go back to law school again. The Muslim personal law is customary law which cannot override a statute like POSCO.
                                      Reply
                                      1. R
                                        Ramakrishnan Kinattukara
                                        Mar 21, 2017 at 5:54 am
                                        Without females mc would not have been borne. Show some graude.
                                        Reply
                                        1. M
                                          Mahender Goriganti
                                          Mar 21, 2017 at 3:45 am
                                          Sad, the reason why all personal laws should be dissolved/over ruled uniform civil code of law of land should be applied.
                                          Reply
                                          1. M
                                            mc
                                            Mar 21, 2017 at 2:21 am
                                            Agree and all rears understands it as well. Only feminist paid fake medias are creating confusion in the country.
                                            Reply
                                            1. Load More Comments