Shunted out to Mizoram, Maharashtra Governor resigns: ‘have right not to go’

Another Congress appointee, K Sankaranarayanan, resigns after being transferred to Mizoram.

By: Express News Service | Mumbai | Updated: August 25, 2014 7:48 am
According to sources, Sankaranarayanan decided to resign almost immediately after Rashtrapati Bhawan issued the communique regarding his transfer post-midnight Saturday.   Source: AP photo  According to sources, Sankaranarayanan decided to resign almost immediately after Rashtrapati Bhawan issued the communique regarding his transfer post-midnight Saturday. Source: AP photo

Hours after he was transferred to Mizoram, Maharashtra Governor K Sankaranarayanan resigned on Sunday. He said the government has the “right” to transfer a Governor, while he has the right to decide “not to go”.

“The government has every right… the President of India has the right to transfer a Governor. There is nothing wrong in it. I am not questioning that right,” he told The Indian Express. “They have the right to transfer and I have the right not to go. So I have resigned,” he said.

“It is for you to decide whether it is a case of political vendetta or anything else. I don’t have any opinion. The people will have to decide. The media too has 100 per cent right to analyse all these things,” he said.

According to sources, Sankaranarayanan decided to resign almost immediately after Rashtrapati Bhawan issued the communique regarding his transfer post-midnight Saturday. However, he waited for the official presidential notification to reach Raj Bhawan.

“I am not interested in going to Mizoram. I have resigned, and shall now return to politics,” said the veteran 82-year-old Congress leader from Kerala. His tenure was set to end in 2017.

The Mizoram Governor’s post fell vacant after the Centre earlier sacked another Congress appointee, Kamla Beniwal, who shared an uneasy relationship with Modi during her previous stint as Gujarat Governor.

While he said he does not plan to challenge the transfer, Sankaranarayanan said he saw nothing wrong in Uttarakhand Governor Aziz Qureshi’s decision to approach the Supreme Court. “It is his fundamental right to go to the court,” he said.

Sankaranarayanan moved out of Raj Bhawan on Sunday evening, and is expected to head to Kerala on Monday.

Admitting that he felt hurt, he said, “Even politicians from the BJP and Shiv Sena know that I never let politics come in the way of exercising and upholding constitutional powers vested in me as Governor.”

He said he would speak further on the reasons behind his transfer and his decision to quit on Monday. “I am a common man now,” he remarked.

Sankaranarayanan was among the first batch of Congress-appointed Governors who were asked to quit after the Modi government took over. In June this year, he admitted that he had received two phone calls from Union Home Secretary Anil Goswami asking him to resign. But he had dug in his heels, mantaining that he would only consider quitting if asked by an “appropriate authority”.

While Gujarat Governor Om Prakash Kohli took additional charge as Maharashtra Governor on Sunday evening, sources said veteran BJP leaders Kalyan Singh, V K Malhotra, and Kailash Joshi were in the race for the post.

The abrupt transfer led to a political slugfest with the ruling Congress-NCP combine in Maharashtra targeting the BJP-led government at the Centre. While mantaining that the Centre had the power to replace Governors, NCP chief Sharad Pawar said, “What was not happening earlier is taking place now. We are worried about the kind of days that lie ahead of us.”

Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan said he was always mantained that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has dictatorial tendencies.

State PCC chief Manikrao Thakre said Sankaranarayanan’s transfer was a case political vendetta. “Everybody knows that he never used the post to settle political scores. Yet, just before the assembly elections, he is transferred. This is nothing but an insult,” he said.

Countering these charges, state BJP president Devendra Fadnavis said the Congress-NCP combine was “politicising an administrative decision.”

Barring a row that erupted following his decision to refuse sanction to CBI to prosecute former Maharashtra Chief Minister

Ashok Chavan in the Adarsh housing society case, Sankaranarayanan’s tenure in Maharashtra remained non-controversial.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    Ramesh
    Aug 25, 2014 at 6:20 am
    Why such words?
    Reply
  2. L
    Lochan
    Aug 25, 2014 at 3:52 am
    Good decision by the Center, A Guv, who allowed corruption to free flow in the Universities in Maharashtra was required to be thrown out. His resignation was not a Virtue, but an inquiry against him was pending In the Universities Scam and he was likely to meet the Kamala Beniwal fate, therefore resigned. Good riddance.
    Reply
  3. S
    Sreenivas
    Aug 24, 2014 at 7:53 pm
    These so called "governors" are power hungry and doing nothing for the country !
    Reply
  4. A
    A n
    Aug 25, 2014 at 2:29 am
    Who else from old regime are left ,now?They must make up their mind fast or quit the office like Beniwal and shankarnarayanan.The Parliamentary democracy system has its nuances and once the new Govt. Takes office,people in ornamental office like Governer,who hold office at the pleasure of the President MUST quit gracefully,even if they are renamed later.But quitting this way is quite disgraceful .Everyone knows that they were picked by UPA govt.and enjo their tenure,some even pla politics.This has come to restore the dignity of the office of Governer.or else abolish .The role and accountability of the office also needs to be redefined in the larger interests of the public
    Reply
  5. V
    Venk
    Aug 24, 2014 at 9:18 pm
    Do Indian States need a Governor - a post created by the British Raj to represent the British Monarch and Viceroy - a largely ceremonial role and an unelected position.
    Reply
  6. G
    Gopal Gopal
    Aug 26, 2014 at 2:59 pm
    That is not the consutional position. The political cl has changed all that and that is the reason why governors have become pkaythings in their hands..like many things in our country governorship has lost its sancy and it is better that this position is abolished.
    Reply
  7. G
    Gopal Gopal
    Aug 24, 2014 at 5:54 pm
    There goes another. Right or wrong it smacks of vendetta !
    Reply
  8. C
    C
    Aug 25, 2014 at 10:15 am
    There has to be a selection process for the Governors so that politicians who lose election or not wanted in the party, were not appointed as Governors. Or like the president, the Governors also could be elected by an electoral college. A Governor once appointed should remain for the full tenure.
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments