What the Rafale deal means for India, the way forward

The ostensible reason for India starting a separate process, away from the 126 aircraft deal, is to urgently meet the “critical operational necessity” of the IAF.

Written by Sushant Singh | New Delhi | Updated: April 14, 2015 7:08 am
Rafale deal, Modi in France, India France deals, Indian Rafale, Rafale airplanes, Defence Ministry, Defence Minister, IAF, Indian Airforce, India news, National news The ostensible reason for India starting a separate process, away from the 126 aircraft deal, is to urgently meet the “critical operational necessity” of the IAF.

During Prime Minister Modi’s visit to France this week, India sought supply of 36 Rafale fighter jets in “fly-away” condition. This is under a government-to-government deal, unlike the tender currently being negotiated by the Ministry of Defence with Dassault, Rafale’s manufacturer.

Share This Article
Related Article

Earlier, Rafale had been chosen as the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) for the IAF after a stringent technical evaluation and global tender process which lasted a decade. That tender proposed the purchase of 18 Rafale aircraft in “fly-away” condition, and 108 to be made operational by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited under a transfer of technology clause.

The ostensible reason for India starting a separate process, away from the 126 aircraft deal, is to urgently meet the “critical operational necessity” of the IAF.

Dr Iskander Rehman, Paris-based non-resident Fellow in the South Asia Programme at the Atlantic Council says, “I can only imagine the collective sighs of relief at this announcement, not only among the French employees of Dassault, but also within the IAF, which has repeatedly expressed its concern over the steady haemorrhaging of the Indian air fleet. This acquisition couldn’t have been more pressing in nature.”

The bold political call taken by the Indian government is also a reflection of the frustration on both sides at how bogged down the deal has got in terms of procedures and pricing negotiations. As it is a government-to-government deal, India should be able to get these aircraft cheaper. The negotiations over price are still on but experts estimate at least a 10% lower price for these 36 aircraft. With limited funds available for capital acquisition in the defence budget, monetary considerations are an important factor in any major Indian procurement.

The announcement, however, doesn’t talk about making Rafale in Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL), a core proposition of the original tender. This multi-billion dollar procurement thus runs contrary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Make in India plan for the defence sector.

This has led to whispers of some other high-end defence technology transfers from France as a quid pro quo for this deal. One such technology being spoken about is the reactor for the Ship Submersible Ballistic Nuclear (SSBN)

Submarine. India is currently in the process of making its first indigenous nuclear submarine, the Arihant. A nuclear submarine is seen as the best guarantor for a second strike capability in case of a nuclear conflict because it can stay underwater for longer periods than a diesel submarine, which needs to come to the surface for oxygen intake.
Speculation aside, there are doubts that France will part with such technology.”India badly needs help perfecting its SSBN reactors, but something tells me that that technology is way too sensitive for the French to part with it, even if India tries to strongarm them over the Rafale deal,” a French military analyst told The Indian Express.

Air Vice Marshal Manmohan Bahadur (retd), Distinguished Fellow at the Centre for Air Power Studies suggests a way in which the current deal could help the Make in India programme in the defence sector. The Maintenance Transfer of Technology (MTOT) for these 36 Rafale fighters should go to a private vendor instead of HAL. The DPP (2013 revised) clearly specifies that nomination of DPSUs like HAL for MTOT can be done away with and the contract given to a private vendor.

“We have so far not leveraged the MTOTs. If we give the Rafale MTOT to a private player, positive spin-offs will happen as it will expose that vendor to R&D and modern technology,” AVM Bahadur said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Frank Zane
    Apr 14, 2015 at 5:43 pm
    Why would India buy the Rafale combat aircraft rejected by every other interested country—Brazil, Canada, the Netherlands, Norway, South Korea, Singapore, and even the cash-rich but not particularly discriminating Saudi Arabia and Morocco? India’s purchase of fighter jets may be a means to achieve greater hard power, but in the process, as domestic social conditions of misery and injustice continue to fester, it is losing soft power. There are structural and policy issues: education, apart from that for the elite, is appalling; infrastructure is equally so; there is widespread corruption; and widespread disease.
    1. R
      rahul p
      Apr 15, 2015 at 2:34 am
      You will understand India's situation only when you have neighbors like stan, Afghanistan and China. Indians like peace but are between a rock and crazy place. Govt. needs money for development but cannot be defenseless
      1. S
        Apr 14, 2015 at 12:33 pm
        This is a fact that Indian statesmen give much more preference to defence or military than its own people. The defence budget enjoys huge share alone which made rest of developmental projects to suffer a lot. It doesn’t matter that India children go hunger due to wrong priorities. Buying fighter jet planes are not as much important than feeding the humanity. Why our Government is so much insecure about its defence imperatives? Despite of heavy budgeting still we are not confident about our security. People are suffering due to these expensive deals a lot but who cares?
        1. E
          Apr 14, 2015 at 11:44 am
          A nation which is unable to provide security to its people and to make them sure of feeding them up with three times bread is actually a nation which is very much into military developments and has actually forgotten the sole purpose behind making the country a united nation. The rafale deal would only exacerbate the regional hegemonic postures and India's military night i the region but what about the people who are dying just because they are not getting enough food to eat and are suffering with diseases. For heaven sake, come out of this paranoid disorder and try to live in reality which is not only about border threats rather threat to human security is as well important.