Sahara’s bid to get its chief Subrata Roy released from jail fell flat on Friday after the Supreme Court rejected its plea, lashing out at the group for “insulting” the court while not being willing to pay back investors’ money.
A bench of Justices K S Radhakrishnan and J S Khehar described Sahara’s proposal on refunding investors as “dishonourable”, and refused to order Roy’s release. It posted the matter for Tuesday — and Roy will remain in judicial custody until then. He was sent to the jail on March 4.
Sahara came up with a proposal to pay Rs 2,500 crore within three days, and the remaining amount in five instalments, the last of which was to come in July 2015.
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
Senior advocate C A Sundaram pleaded with the court to release Roy, claiming it would be impossible to borrow money without him. “One person who can find money is not in a position to do so. Let him come out and he will look for money. Let this Rs 2,500 crore that we are paying up front help him come out,” the lawyer said.
The bench shot down the plea as “not acceptable”, especially in view of the fact that Roy had been jailed only two days ago, and had been free to arrange the money over the last year and a half when the court was asking him to. “We will tell you how this looks to us. You make us sit in a special bench and then you give a proposal which is not acceptable at all. It is a big insult for us to make us assemble in a special bench when you don’t have a proper offer to make. You cannot make judges of the Supreme Court assemble for a man who is not willing to pay,” the court said.
It added: “It is a dishonourable proposal. Come to us only if you have a honourable proposal… a more attractive and acceptable proposal.”