Supreme Court ruling on convicted MPs,MLAs may lead to new guidelines

The government has withdrawn an ordinance and bill which sought to negate the judgement.

Written by PTI | New Delhi | Updated: March 14, 2014 12:19 pm

The recent Supreme Court ruling on convicted lawmakers may lead to creation of fresh guidelines to help deal with the new scenario where MPs and MLAs stand disqualified immediately upon conviction.

Ordinance on convicted lawmakers: Chronology of events

While the Attorney General has made it clear that following the apex court ruling,convicted MPs and MLAs stand disqualified immediately upon their conviction,the procedure to be followed to announce the disqualification and the subsequent vacancy of seats still remains a ticklish issue for the government,the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha secretariats and the Election Commission.

UPA may recall ordinance on convicted lawmakers as Rahul calls it ‘nonsense’

In its July 10 judgement,the apex court had struck down a provision in the electoral law that protects a convicted lawmaker from disqualification on the ground of pendency of appeal in higher courts.

Lawmakers’ ordinance Congress ploy to save own leaders: BJP

The Lok Sabha secretariat had sought the opinion of the AG following the conviction of RJD leader Lalu Prasad in the fodder scam.

Rahul Gandhi has the final word,Cabinet withdraws ‘nonsense’ ordinance

While the AG explained that the disqualification would be immediate,his opinion is learnt to be silent on the procedure to be followed. He is understood to have said that issuance of notification regarding disqualification was a mere technicality.

Highly placed sources in the Law Ministry said those dealing with disqualification of MPs want clarity on who will take a final call on disqualification and the rules to be followed.

Cabinet overrules Supreme Court,clears ordinance to protect convicted MPs

They,however,said the emerging view is that in case of a conviction of an MP or an MLA,the trial court or the State Election Commission can send the certified copy of the judgement to the presiding officer of the concerned House or state legislature.

The presiding officer can then inform the Election Commission about the vacancy following disqualification.

The EC,on its part,can then proceed further if it wants to hold a bypoll.

“But this may need to be written in black and white as this is a new situation. It will also avoid any future confusion. The law of the land now is that a convicted

lawmaker stands disqualified immediately,” explained a senior government functionary.

Chief Election Commissioner V S Sampath has already made it clear that the EC will initiate steps to fill up the seats of convicted and disqualified lawmakers,including Lalu Prasad and Rasheed Masood,only after they are declared vacant.

“Regarding those MPs,the vacancy consequent to court action has to be notified by the Speaker of the House concerned. After that only further action by the Commission will arise,” Sampath had said yesterday.

Prasad and Masood are two MPs who were convicted after the SC ruling. Also,the government has withdrawn an ordinance and bill which sought to negate the judgement.

The verdict seeks to remove the discrimination between an ordinary individual and an elected lawmaker who enjoys protection under the Representation of People Act.

Under Sec 8(3) of the Act,a person convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years shall be disqualified for that and a further six years after release.

The following sub-section 8(4) says a lawmaker cannot be disqualified for three months from the conviction and if in that period he or she files an appeal against till its disposal by a higher court.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. No Comments.
Express Adda