Srinivasan has conflict of interest, SC choice Gavaskar has some too

In 2008, Gavaskar had resigned as chairman of the ICC’s cricket committee after governing body cited a conflict of interest with his role as a TV commentator.

Mumbai | Updated: March 28, 2014 12:48 pm
In 2010, Gavaskar turned down an offer from BCCI to join the IPL governing council, citing lack of remuneration as the reason. (PTI File) In 2010, Gavaskar turned down an offer from BCCI to join the IPL governing council, citing lack of remuneration as the reason. (PTI File)

In proposing that Sunil Gavaskar should take over from N Srinivasan as BCCI president, the Supreme Court on Thursday expressed a surprise choice — since the former opener would be replacing someone whom the court wants removed for a conflict of interest.

Gavaskar, 64, has sprawling business interests in the game, while being a BCCI-contracted commentator. He is the co-founder of Professional Management Group (PMG), a sports marketing agency, which presently manages the off-field affairs of IPL players Virender Sehwag, Varun Aaron and Manoj Tiwary.

PMG conceived the Castrol Awards for Cricketing Excellence, and organises the annual BCCI awards. Back in 1995, Gavaskar was one of the men who introduced the CEAT cricket rankings under the aegis of PMG. There are rewards on offer for cricketers finishing on top of the rankings every year.

Gavaskar also writes weekly syndicated columns. And PMG handled the IPL-related activities of automobile giant Volkswagen.

Hours after Thursday’s hearing in the court, the retired cricketer announced his willingness to take up the job. “When the highest court of the land tells you to do something, you have to do it,” Gavaskar told NDTV.

A text message sent to him by The Indian Express, asking him if his being at the head of BCCI would result in a conflict of interest, went unanswered.

In 2008, Gavaskar had resigned as chairman of the ICC’s cricket committee after the governing body cited a conflict of interest with his role as a TV commentator.

In 2010, he turned down an offer from BCCI to join the IPL governing council, citing lack of remuneration as the reason. Gavaskar had been part of the governing council in the first three years of the IPL, when each member was paid Rs 1 crore.

“The IPL is a commercial enterprise and non-BCCI members, former cricketers included, should be remunerated for the expertise, experience and time that they bring to the table,” he had said then.

A year later, Gavaskar resigned as head of Mumbai Cricket Association’s (MCA’s) cricket improvement committee. He said he was stretched for time because of his media commitments and the hectic schedule of the Indian team. A few MCA members had then grumbled that Gavaskar, an NRI, did not spend much time in India.

Recently, Gavaskar has been critical of the Indian team’s performance abroad. At the Asia Cup, he alleged on air that there was bias in team selection. He has been scathing on Duncan Fletcher, and has called for the coach’s immediate sacking. For more than two decades, Gavaskar has been the raconteur of Indian cricket, commentating on nearly every match the team has played around the world.

But on the day he was asked to take over the reins of Indian cricket, Gavaskar was in Visakhapatnam, airing his views on the final of the Deodhar Trophy.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    R
    Mar 30, 2014 at 7:26 am
    All sports bodies in India are for milching the cash. Anybody having commercial interests in the sports like ownership of the sports team or promotion of players should be debarred from holding the post. Above all, sports officials should have pla for the country at least for two years. Coaches and fitness officials should have taken care of state teams for three years before before being considered for sports bodies. They should have a retirement age of 70 years. Then only, sports can be promoted in India and we can produce Olympic medal compeors and world cl teams. In hockey we have been relegated to lowest rung because of officials. Why did they allow nature of the game to be changed in such a manner that our budding players cannot even practice on artificial turfs as they are so costly, Among other measures to remove the skill elements of dribbling and dodging from the game.
    Reply
  2. S
    Swaranjeet Singh
    Mar 28, 2014 at 1:28 am
    Thanks Sundaresan for saying what one was wondering would be said at all.
    Reply
Pro Kabaddi League 2017 - Points Table
No.
Team
P
W
L
D
Pts

Pro Kabaddi League 2017 - Schedule
Aug 17, 201721:00 IST
The Arena, Ahmedabad
<!-- Match 33 -->
26
Inter Zone Challenge Week - Match 33
FT
26
Match Tied
Aug 18, 201720:00 IST
Babu Banarasi Das Indoor Stadium, Lucknow
<!-- Match 34 -->
VS
Inter Zone Challenge Week - Match 34
Aug 18, 201721:00 IST
Babu Banarasi Das Indoor Stadium, Lucknow
<!-- Match 35 -->
VS
Inter Zone Challenge Week - Match 35