Special Court rejects CBI closure report in one more case coal block allocation case

Miffed over the shoddy probe, court directed the agency to re-investigate the case of coal block allocation to VMPL Ltd.

Written by Kaunain Sheriff M | New Delhi | Updated: October 16, 2014 9:26 am

Two days after it rejected the closure report in a coal block allocation case, the special court on Wednesday rejected the closure report filed by the CBI in a case related to allocation of coal block to Vikash Metal and Power Ltd (VMPL) in Raniganj, West Bengal – and has directed the agency to re-investigate the case.

Making a veiled reference to the CBI director over the coal allocation probe the judge observed, “The final reports are vetted by the prosecution branch of CBI and thereafter by the CBI Director… the vetting of the reports should not only confirm to the well settled principles of law but also to sound and legally sustainable reasons and logic.”

Miffed over the shoddy probe in the case, Special Judge Bharat Parashar asked the CBI Director and the DIGs —  who are supervising probe in coal scam cases — to ensure proper training of the officers to “hone up” their skills for probing the case.

The special CBI Judge rejecting the closure report in the case has directed the central agency to further investigate the case and a file progress report on the probe on November 10. “It is expected that the report of further investigation will be detailed and conclusive in nature duly supported with legally admissible reasons and not a report prepared as per the whims and fancies of the IO as has been done till now,” the judge said.

Ordering a further probe in the case, the judge said, “I am rather constrained to observe that investigation in the present matter has been carried out in a clandestine manner and the final report of the CBI rather appears to be the document purporting to be a plea of defence of the accused persons rather then the report of an investigation agency.”

The judge said, “The IO was either completely oblivious of the basic nuances of investigation or he deliberately chose not to investigate the case properly with a view to help the company VMPL and its directors or Ministry of Coal officers.”

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. N
    Niladrinath Mohanty
    Oct 16, 2014 at 4:22 am
    The Hon'ble Special Judge has advised the CBI officers to 'hone up' their skill in investigation. I could not agree more. I will give one example from personal experience with CBI. I was being investigated by for corruption having shown undue favour to a contractor in preference to one existing contractor. The existing contractor's performance was so miserable that we had to close factory for a month till we worked out an alternative and I had to terminate the existing contract and with hold contractor's dues. (As far as I know till today the contractor has not come back to collect his with held dues and it happened in 1987). The investigating officer an inspector never bothered to find out about the performance of the existing contractor and filed report on the simple umption the existing contractor was performing satisfactorily. When asked in cross examination during the inquiry conducted by CVC the concerned investigating Inspector said it was not his job to find out what was the performance of the existing contractor which was the basis of case. I still preserve the Inspector's signed cross examination papers with me. Since then I having doubt about the quality of CBI investigations.
    Reply
  2. R
    RK Choubey
    Oct 16, 2014 at 6:53 am
    One more feather to CBI's cap!Simply great work done.Neither the IO nor the SP is from ITBP or BSF,as they are cadre officers,so they don't need training as to how to investigate,rather they are to be told to do fair investigation and if they decide to do so,they are capable persons.
    Reply
  3. C
    Citizen
    Oct 16, 2014 at 3:09 am
    Good order !!! Jaihind
    Reply