Self goal: Delhi shuts off life support to dialogue

Modi has signalled he means to talk tough but bringing about the changes he seeks to the India-Pakistan relationship will take more than words alone.

Written by Praveen Swami | New Delhi | Updated: August 19, 2014 11:33 am
New Delhi gave its assent to a parallel set of meetings between the Hurriyat and Pakistan. New Delhi gave its assent to a parallel set of meetings between the Hurriyat and Pakistan.

“They did nothing,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in an emotional campaign speech about the carnage that hit India on 26/11. “So many people were slaughtered and the government in Delhi — it did nothing,” he went on. “Talk to Pakistan in Pakistan’s language,” he said, “because it won’t learn until then”.

Modi’s government has unveiled its diplomatic vocabulary, cancelling the Foreign Secretary-level talks with Pakistan to protest against a meeting between Kashmiri separatist leaders and Islamabad’s envoy to New Delhi — a regular event since the All Parties Hurriyat Conference was formed in March 1993.

In private, senior Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) officials said the decision was taken because the meeting took place despite protests from New Delhi, which said the meeting would open Modi to criticism from party hardliners.

Meeting Pakistan envoy to new on Dipity.

“Frankly, I can’t see much sense in making a meeting with the Hurriyat a touchstone for India-Pakistan relations,” said analyst Ajai Sahni of the Institute for Conflict Management in New Delhi. “It’s almost as if the government is saying we can live with Pakistan shooting our troops on the Line of Control (LoC), but having tea with secessionists — that’s unforgivable”.

Also read: Modi govt overreacted to Pakistan envoy’s meeting with separatists?

New Delhi’s message, an official spokesperson said on Monday, was simple: “The only path available to Pakistan is to resolve outstanding issues through a peaceful bilateral dialogue within the framework and principles of the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration”. Those words — omitting mention of the Composite Dialogue the two countries began in 2004 — suggests New Delhi is shutting off life support for a 10-year-old secret dialogue process that was meant to resolve the Kashmir conflict.

“This will strengthen anti-India hardliners, and won’t deter the Army and its Islamist proxies from pursuing terrorism,” said Ayesha Siddiqa, a prominent Pakistani defence analyst. “I just can’t see what the payoff for India is”.

The secret dialogue

The real significance of the decision is that it brings down the curtain on a secret dialogue on Kashmir dating back 10 years and more. In February 1999, Prime Ministers Atal Behari Vajpayee and Nawaz Sharif signed the Lahore Declaration, committing both countries “to implementing the Simla Agreement in letter and spirit”. Even as the Lahore agreement was being drafted, though, Pakistani troops were being trained to push their way across the LoC in Kargil — and the December 13, 2001 attack on Parliament broke Vajpayee’s patience.

Though the 2001-2002 crisis fizzled out, with India deterred from going to war by fears of a nuclear conflict, the crisis also inflicted sharp economic costs on Pakistan. General Pervez Musharraf, who displaced Sharif in a military coup, entered into a ceasefire with India and scaled back support for Kashmir jihadist groups.

From 2002, violence in Kashmir saw a year-on-year decline — paving the way for diplomats Satinder Lambah and Tariq Aziz to get to work. The two men met secretly from 2005, arriving at five points of convergence: there would be no redrawing of the LoC; greater autonomy on both sides; a phased troop withdrawal; cooperative management of some natural resources; and freedom of trade and movement.

Indian politicians agreed, early on, that this dialogue would need political legitimisation in Kashmir — and sought the Hurriyat’s support. In February 2004, then Home Minister L K Advani met the separatist leaders for ice-breaking talks. From 2006, Hurriyat leaders also met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Home Minister P Chidambaram, for both disclosed and secret talks.

New Delhi gave its assent to a parallel set of meetings between the Hurriyat and Pakistan, intended to push reluctant secessionists to back the nascent peace deal — one that fell well short of their aspiration of independence. In 2004, Pakistani Foreign Minister Khursheed Kasuri and Foreign Secretary Riaz Khokhar met Hurriyat leaders. Musharraf also held talks with the separatists in 2005, with Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz following up in April 2007.

“I think the agenda is pretty much set,” Srinagar cleric and Hurriyat leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said soon after. “It is September 2007,” he said, “…that India and Pakistan are looking at, in terms of announcing something on Kashmir.”

Flailing peace process

But events didn’t pan out as planned: Musharraf was swept from power. His successor, Prime Minister Asif Ali Zardari, showed commitment to peace, calling Islamist insurgents in Kashmir “terrorists” and calling for economic integration. The 26/11 attacks, however, came weeks after, making clear that hawks in Pakistan’s military weren’t on board with their Prime Minister. Following the attacks in Mumbai, the peace process flailed — and never recovered.

India-Pakistan problems have steadily grown since. In 2012, the LoC ceasefire began to fray, with exchanges of fire increasing every year since. Inside Jammu and Kashmir, attacks on Indian forces increased from that year, reversing a decade-long trend.

New Delhi-based officials said the decision to call off talks over a relatively trivial issue was taken to make clear that there would be consequences if red lines were breached in the future. “We’ve called off talks because Pakistan would not heed our concerns,” a Ministry of Home Affairs official told The Indian Express. “We hope it will understand that we will also respond if more significant red lines, on issues like terrorism, are breached”.

Like Manmohan Singh before him, though, Modi may discover his options aren’t easy ones, if that does happen.

The Prime Minister could, for example, order strikes across the LoC in the event of a major terrorist attack, as Singh considered doing after 26/11. The tactic might not achieve much, though. In August 1998, the US fired missiles into Afghanistan, seeking to avenge bombings which killed 224 people. In all, 75 missiles, each priced at $1.5 million, killed six minor jihadists.

Moreover, Pakistan could hit back, targeting Indian industrial infrastructure, which is much more expensive than tent-and-donkey cart training camps. Nor can anyone guarantee missile strikes wouldn’t escalate into war, or even a nuclear exchange.

Modi has signalled he means to talk tough — but bringing about the changes he seeks to the India-Pakistan relationship will take more than words alone.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App now

  1. A
    Anonymous
    Aug 20, 2014 at 6:34 am
    stan will never change . All efforts of the past have just brought us to back to the same spot. the prime minister is right take the approach he has taken. We can not have the fifth column in our midst dictating the same old past ways of diplomacy.
    Reply
    1. N
      Ninad
      Aug 19, 2014 at 6:06 am
      When the article says it is a knee jerk reaction i really think whether the writer is out of mind or really have been paid by stan. This is clear hand twist tacticks by Modi government. Modi has clearly indicated that any interference by stan in Indian matters will not be tolerated. This shows that kashmir is integral part of India and stan how much concerned they may be will not be appreciated in poking their Nose. When stan was already warned about not to meet the separatist, how can thy challenge Indian authority on Indian Land.
      Reply
      1. A
        Anand Kumar
        Aug 19, 2014 at 11:11 am
        What is there to talk when we have not to give Kashmir valley. However If stan wants to take all its sympathisers in the valley to POK, we must open talks.
        Reply
        1. A
          Apurva Singh
          Aug 19, 2014 at 3:47 pm
          quite right.. the author typifies all that is negative in our governments.. the typical weakness and meekness.. times are changing and such authors should be thrown into the garbage can.
          Reply
          1. A
            Arun Murthy
            Aug 19, 2014 at 7:24 am
            Modi's action has made redundant track-2 diplomacy seekers such as Vaidik, Padgaonkar, Varadarajan. That is good news. Tactics used in past 60 years have not yielded anything in Indo-Pak relations. Hope, Modi will give a new turn to it.
            Reply
            1. B
              Balakrishnan Subramanyam
              Aug 20, 2014 at 4:35 pm
              The article under the caption self goal is nothing but rubbishstead of wheartedly commending the strong measures initiated by the Government, the article tends to down play the same as if India is at the Mercy of stan.No dialogue is going to be fruitful at any level as stan 's version of Kashmir issue solution is to handover the state to them on a silver Platter .No dialogues so far have been fruitful & it is high time India starts boycotting & isolating stan & also deal strongly with any covert action that Pak may dare to take.Enough of Nuclear Blackmailing by Pak.Let the bluff be exposed in the manner it needs to be donedia is a large country & we can afford to ignore stan at all costs. Congress leaders appear to have lost all the senses as we see quite a few of them talking Pro Pak language now & then.It was nothing but foolish all along in allowing Pak functionaries interacting with the Kashmir Separatists.Our Democracy does not mean allowing subvert activities being being openly endorsed the past the leaders were not wise enough to object any parleys between the separatists & stan but that mistake need not be repeated any more.Deal with a crook in the manner to be dealt to put an end to the problems once & for all.Any of the Indian politicians protesting against the right steps initiated by the NDA government can very well shift their establishment to stan as early as possible.
              Reply
              1. B
                Barry Kaul
                Aug 24, 2014 at 12:35 pm
                The writer is living in fool's paradise,because Muslims always complain and complain and finally get the thing they want,.You settle Kashmir today ,next day they will complain about imaginary atrocities on Muslims in Kerala,then am and then Up,and the list will never end.
                Reply
                1. R
                  Raj
                  Aug 21, 2014 at 6:07 am
                  Smart to call off this wasted exercise – the stani’s can’toffer anything and will only waste our time with their usual nonsense about “talks”dia should also threaten to pull out of the Indus watertreaty unless stan sticks to the Shimla and La declarations andconsiders the representatives of Pandiths, Jammu and Ladhaki people in ANYtalks about “Kashmiri people”.
                  Reply
                  1. G
                    Girish
                    Aug 19, 2014 at 8:14 am
                    'Prime Minister' Asif Ali Zardari!LOL
                    Reply
                    1. H
                      Haridas Rao
                      Aug 20, 2014 at 2:48 am
                      I have seen Swami onTV a number of times.He is quite negative as regards India's foreign policy .This is in line with his paper - The Hindu .They seem to think that only their view is correct and the views and policies of the government are incorrect. Mr.Swami,stan does not want peace with India ,whatever apologists may say;the aim of stan ,is quite literally ,the weakening of India and its break up.Until Pak lovers like Swami do not realize this their views will have no impact.
                      Reply
                      1. J
                        joseph
                        Aug 19, 2014 at 6:27 am
                        Thats why you are not a diplomat and just a writer.
                        Reply
                        1. A
                          Ajith Kumar
                          Aug 19, 2014 at 8:05 am
                          This is the most damaging reality of India.For ARMCHAIR Critics and failed diplomatsit is a pastime to ridicle a Prime Minister elected with an unprecedented mandate on adecision on relations with the enemy.
                          Reply
                          1. H
                            Happy
                            Aug 19, 2014 at 12:06 pm
                            Swami is crying both way. If Modi had gone with meeting Swami would have criticized Modi. Now he cancelled the meeting Swami again criticized Modi. Swami is talking Congress language that criticize Modi either way.
                            Reply
                            1. M
                              Manoj Ahuja
                              Aug 19, 2014 at 7:27 am
                              A sharp increase in ceasefire violations has made it obvious that Pak PM is not in control and Army, as always, is calling the shots. Attack on Indian consulate in Herat days before Modi's swearing in ceremony is another indication that hawkish elements in stan are in control. The back channel diplomacy might have led to a decline in terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir but India paid a high price for it when stan-based terrorists struck on 26/11. So, it is not surprising that Modi government has adopted a tough posture. A message needs to be sent to powers that be in stan that it cannot be business as usual while it continues to sponsor terror strikes and other anti-India activities.
                              Reply
                              1. T
                                Truly Truly
                                Aug 24, 2014 at 8:44 pm
                                In no other country will you find the countrymen support an enemy and ridicule their own country all just out of hatred for one man-Modi!For the secularists in this country -even if stan attacks India and grabs our territory they will be happy inside and outside because that will help them abuse Modi for another 10 years just like they abused him over a riot in 2002.He has stripped the Secular journos of their masks and that makes them hate him even more.Absolute shame that our Secular journos want us to fall at stans feet!
                                Reply
                                1. P
                                  PMMKRISHNA
                                  Aug 20, 2014 at 9:36 am
                                  we have nothing to lose if pak is offended. stan is a rudderless ship. it drifts with the waves. let them sort out their house before they come to the table. it is too early to conclude.
                                  Reply
                                  1. R
                                    rajani kant
                                    Aug 20, 2014 at 3:46 pm
                                    By calling off secretarylevel talks Modi has sent a strong message to Pak. In case, even ifthe J&K issue gets resolved, the Pak Army will not settle for peaceat all till it gets India balkanised because the Pak Army’s, (the real powerwielder in Pak) death-wish is to avenge its humiliating 1971 defeat. Thecivilian Pak govt which is under the tutelage of Pak Army has no power exceptto dance to the tune of its master. Therefore, to expect peacefultalks/meetings from Pak is like searching a needle in the desert. Timehas come to take a final decision on J&K for us. From time immemorialJ&K has been the integral part of Bharat/ India and if due to change oftime/period if the people there have converted to some other religion (whicheventually was a forced conversion) and have majority, doesn't mean that theirwill to have a separate independent nation on the basis of religion should begranted. Today, it is J&K's demand, tomorrow it will be some otherdistrict/state where a particular community will be in majority and it willseek independence. Therefore, such demands should be quelled for everfirstly, through peace efforts if the seeker agrees; or through the samelanguage of the seeker, even if he speaks the language of violence.
                                    Reply
                                    1. R
                                      Ravi Ranjan
                                      Aug 19, 2014 at 3:43 am
                                      Whatever those advocates of peace between Nelhi and Rawalpindi may say it is well known that the civil services and military in stan do not want India and stan to remain in peace as they fear they will lose primacy and thus elected governments have little say in foreign policy mattersdia rightly decided that it could not put up with deliberate attempts of the stan establishment to undermine the efforts initiated by modi.
                                      Reply
                                      1. R
                                        Rufusd
                                        Aug 19, 2014 at 11:02 pm
                                        Talks with stan on the issue of Kashmir at any time or under most cirstances except , perhaps, to exchange the bodies of dead soilders or to facilitate temporary ceasefire in case hostilities progress to the level of a mini war, is exercise in futility. stan needs India's hostility to continue existing in it's present form; and the Indians need stan's hostility to s up it's Hindu ideny and thereby it's unity. The two neighbours are going to be at loggerheads for ever. You remember what Churchill had said about Sikhism, fanaticism and ultra fanaticism being capable of co-existing in peace only under the Union Jack or something to that effect? That observation still holds water except that the Union Jack which came in wake of the advent of the English East India Company on the Sub-Continent may be replicated by something less authoritarian at first sight though not anymore less imperious with the second coming of the East India Companies in the form of present day Transnational Corporations (TNCs)
                                        Reply
                                        1. R
                                          RUPESHOR SINGH
                                          Aug 20, 2014 at 8:31 am
                                          I am glad that we are now showing some spine. Since it is settled that Kashmir is an integral part of India, the only topic remaining for discussion is - when will stan vacate the stan Occupied Kashmir (POK) ?
                                          Reply
                                          1. B
                                            bhimsen
                                            Aug 20, 2014 at 8:17 am
                                            What is there to speak with stan? You talk with Nawaz toay and tomorrow their Army topples the dialogue. Waste of time. Just payback in the same coin. Better to develop Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal than with Pak / China.
                                            Reply
                                            1. Load More Comments