• Associate Sponsor

SC to examine if Akhilesh govt withdrawing cases against ‘Yadav’ community

The High Court had directed the state govt to adduce details of all cases in the last three years where prosecutions were withdrawn from courts, involving Yadavs as accused.

Written by Utkarsh Anand | New Delhi | Updated: May 19, 2015 12:42 am
Akhilesh Yadav, Akhilesh Yadav cases, Akhilesh Yadav withdraw cases, UP government withdraw case, Uttar Pradesh government, Yadav community, UP news, akhilesh yadav news The court said it would examine the matter and stayed the operation of the High Court order in the meantime.

The Supreme Court on Monday said it would examine whether the Akhilesh Yadav-led Uttar Pradesh government is withdrawing criminal cases filed against the Yadav community.

“You (state) first go to the court and make the courts take cognisance of the matter. Then you want cases to be withdrawn. This can surely be looked into whether you are invariably withdrawing prosecution against a particular community,” said a bench of Justices A K Sikri and Uday U Lalit.

The state government had moved the top court against an order by the Allahabad High Court on May 7. The High Court had asked the state government to adduce details of all cases in the last two years – after the Samajwadi Party government came to power in the state – where prosecutions were withdrawn from courts in cases with Yadavs as accused.

The High Court had passed this order while hearing a writ petition by one Ram Narain Yadav, who complained that while the state government had withdrawn prosecutions against a large number of people from his community, he was not being accorded the same “favour”.

Challenging this order, the state government told the apex court that the High Court erroneously indicted them of favouring a particular class while hearing a petition which was not even maintainable in law.

The counsel told the bench that the High Court was not justified in casting aspersion on the state government and holding that cases were being withdrawn against a particular community.

“Moreover, when the statute itself provides the procedure for the same, and a catena of judgments to hold that while the state government possesses the power to withdraw criminal prosecution of the case, the High Court ought not to interfere with the executive power of the state government,” said the counsel.

The bench agreed with the state government that it would be a mammoth exercise to dig out all such cases in the last three years but also said that a constitutional court could go into the criteria for withdrawal of prosecutions.

It agreed to examine the matter and stayed the High Court order in the meantime. The bench issued notices to Ram Narain Yadav and others and said it would adjudicate the matter at length.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Vikas yadav
    May 18, 2015 at 5:28 pm
    What a farzi news.....
    (0)(0)
    Reply
    1. A
      arpit rai
      May 18, 2015 at 3:55 pm
      Well I must say that SC should also examine all the past UPPSC recruitments since SAMAJVADI PARTY came into power.
      (0)(0)
      Reply
      1. A
        ah
        May 18, 2015 at 3:15 pm
        well SC should FOCUS on Gujarat also .................. or will it be too much to ask?
        (0)(0)
        Reply
        1. M
          Mohan
          May 18, 2015 at 5:58 pm
          File a peion what stops you!
          (0)(0)
          Reply
          1. M
            Mohan
            May 18, 2015 at 5:57 pm
            Mammoth excercise ! That many cases have been withdrawn ! If they could be "considered" for withdrawal and case withdrawn presuming, after application of mind in each case, why is it a "mammoth task to report to the Court ?
            (0)(0)
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments
            Adda