• Associate Sponsor

People want governance not controversies: Jaitley to AAP as Kejriwal-Jung row escalates

"The people of Delhi experimented with a new party in the elections, but it is a very costly experiment because governance is not their political agenda," said Jaitley.

By: Press Trust of India | New Delhi | Updated: May 19, 2015 8:35 pm
arun jaitley, aap, arvind kejriwal, najeeb jung, chief secretary row, latest news, breaking news, latest delhi news, latest india news, delhi chief minister, delhi lieutenant governor, aap news, aam aadmi party news, arvind kejriwal news, arun jaitley news, najeeb jung news, lg, delhi lg news, lieutenant governor news, Arvind Kejriwal, Arvind Kejriwal news, Najeeb jung, Kejriwal news, Delhi Lt-Governor, AAP government, Chief secretary row, Shakuntala Gamlin,  Arvind Kejriwal secretary,  AAP, AAP kejriwal, Lt-Governor, delhi news, city news, local news, Indian Express Arun Jaitley was speaking at Delhi BJP’s Executive Committee meeting.

As tension escalates between Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and Lt Governor Najeeb Jung, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today said people’s experiment with AAP has turned out to be “very costly” and asked the party to realise its responsibilities as it came to power with a historic mandate.

“The people of Delhi experimented with a new party in the elections, but it is a very costly experiment because governance is not their political agenda,” said Jaitley.

Share This Article
Related Article

He was speaking at Delhi BJP’s Executive Committee meeting.

In an apparent reference to various controversies surrounding the AAP government, particularly the tussle between Kejriwal and Jung, Jaitley said people of Delhi want governance and the ruling dispensation must understand it.

READ: AAP hits back at Arun Jaitley

“Whatever is happening in Delhi in last few months, it seems coming days may be painful. The AAP government came following a huge mandate. They should understand their responsibilities. People want governance and not controversy. So they should understand their responsibilities and fulfil people’s expectations,” he said.

Jaitley said Delhi could have been turned into a global city as it has great opportunities for business and tourism.

The confrontation over appointment of Shakuntala Gamlin as acting chief secretary of Delhi had turned into a full-blown war between the ruling AAP and Jung with Kejriwal alleging that the LG was trying to take over the administration.

Despite Kejriwal’s strong opposition, Jung had appointed her to the post on Friday.

The AAP government yesterday directed all its officials to apprise the Chief Minister or Minister concerned about any oral or written direction from the LG or his office before following them.

The LG has also hardened his stand maintaining that he was the main authority in dealing with transfers and postings of senior bureaucrats. The BJP has been severely critical of AAP government.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Ajay Mittal
    May 20, 2015 at 6:42 am
    With what face and tongue this small man with a small mouth speak on behalf of Delhi voters when his party has been routed out of Delhi like never before? What does he think- the Delhi voter wouldn't know how to judge performance?
    1. B
      May 19, 2015 at 10:29 pm
      Mr, Jaitley and other masters of Mr Jung in BJP (and RIL) should tell the same to Delhi LG than duly elected CM of Delhi.
      1. T
        May 20, 2015 at 12:52 pm
        But Rahul hi suggested AK67 "if problem with LG why not try Samsung or our own Voltas" is the best in the present hot summer season
        1. A
          May 19, 2015 at 4:34 pm
          Advise should have given to LG. Change him.
          1. B
            Bijan Mohanty
            May 19, 2015 at 9:52 pm
            Mr. Jaitley is right that people want governance and people are really anno the way in which The Govt. at the Center is disrupting good governance of Delhi Govt. through the shadow boxing of Lt Governor. Center should drop the dirty politics of interfering with good governance where the Party of the Center is not in power.
            1. Load More Comments