Not initiating any inquiry into Gujarat snooping row, Centre tells Supreme Court

The petition had sought to prohibit both the central and state governments from probing the episode.

Written by Utkarsh Anand | New Delhi | Updated: May 9, 2014 1:59 pm
A bench led by Justice Ranjana P Desai asked the woman to approach the Gujarat high court to get inquiry started by the state government quashed. A bench led by Justice Ranjana P Desai asked the woman to approach the Gujarat high court to get inquiry started by the state government quashed.

The Supreme Court Tuesday took on record the Centre’s response that it was not initiating any inquiry into the alleged illegal surveillance of a woman architect in Gujarat and disposed of a petition filed by her and her father.

A bench led by Justice Ranjana P Desai further asked the woman to approach the Gujarat high court to get the inquiry started by the state government quashed.

Appearing for the centre, Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran told the bench that there was no proposal to set up a commission of inquiry into the snooping episode.

The counsel for Gujarat government sought to leave it to the wisdom of the court while refraining from making a statement on quashing the pending inquiry in the state.

The petition had sought to prohibit both the central and state governments from probing the episode.

Asserting the right to privacy and right to live with dignity, the petition said the woman was satisfied with the safety measures taken by the Gujarat government when her life was under threat and the court now needed to put an end to the “sinister campaign” to target her and her family’s reputation.

“The constitution of commission by the state government is wholly unwarranted and unjustified. The attempt being made by the central government to constitute a similar commission which would necessarily infringe upon and encroach upon right to privacy of the petitioners and their family which would clearly be unwarranted and unjustified and would be violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners and their family members as guaranteed under Article 21 of the constitution,” said the petition.

It questioned why the governments have gone ahead with decisions to set up commissions of inquiry even after knowing that the woman, who it said is now happily married, had approached the National Commission for Women and Gujarat State Commission for Women.

They claimed that the malicious campaign had led them to change house four times in a few months and their e-mail accounts were hacked and indecent calls are being made to them.

In the petition, they also took objection to suspended Gujarat IAS officer Pradeep Sharma raising the snooping controversy and seeking a CBI probe based on what they said were unverified and unauthenticated contents published by two web portals. Sharma’s petition is pending in the SC.

Referring to the news portals Cobrapost and Gulail airing audio tapes featuring the alleged illegal surveillance of the woman, Sharma has sought a probe into the case by the CBI or by a special investigation team.

In reply to his petition, the Gujarat government has accused the central government of “connivance” for an “engineered controversy” into the snooping row. It has claimed that not only the father but the woman was also aware that she was being tracked by state agencies and that she remained “thankful” for it.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. R
    Raja
    May 9, 2014 at 8:54 am
    the entire story of the daughter and father is suious. If the lady was afraid of any person, she should have filed a complaint with police who would have looked into the matter. In what way a ministry can be involved in policing? there smells a rat, for sure.
    Reply
    1. L
      Luhar Luhar
      May 9, 2014 at 10:28 pm
      Will all those who slandered Modi and Amit Shah over this issue apologize?
      Reply
      1. R
        Raj Sharma
        May 9, 2014 at 11:29 am
        The communal and corrupt Congress is going to be thrown out and in their desperation has invented an issue where there is none.
        Reply