MPs get a room to smoke, activists tell Speaker it breaks your law

Incidentally, all of Parliament including its grounds is a non-smoking zone though an exception has been made for MPs

Written by Abantika Ghosh | New Delhi | Updated: August 6, 2015 11:50 am
Parliament smoking area, Sumitra Mahajan, Parliament smoking area, Member of parliament smoking area, smoking area, MPs smoking area, Tobacco, Cigarettes smoking, Cigarettes smoking area, Parliament session, Parliament Monsoon session, congress, Bjp, india news, nation news Incidentally, all of Parliament including its grounds is a non-smoking zone though an exception has been made for MPs. (Illustration: Sasikumar)

A designated smoking area for MPs inside Parliament has raised the hackles of anti-tobacco activists. A health institute involved in fighting against tobacco has written to the Lok Sabha Speaker saying the definition of a public place as laid down in the anti-tobacco Act would include Parliament, hence the decision to allow MPs to smoke violates the law.

“As per Section 4 of the Act smoking in all public places is prohibited since October 2008,” says the letter to Sumitra Mahajan, referring to the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act 2003. “The definition of ‘public places’ provided under section 3(1) of the Act read along with Rule 2(d) of the Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places Rules 2008 (2008 rules), includes workplaces as well, thus Parliament House comes under the purview of public places under the Act.”

A group of MPs including Sougata Roy (Trinamool), Kiren Rijiju (BJP) and Sitaram Yechury (CPM) had reportedly been requesting the Speaker for some time for a designated smoking area inside Parliament.  Their wish was granted recently when the waiting lounge in the Central Hall was informally designated the MPs’ smoking area.

Watch video

Incidentally, all of Parliament including its grounds is a non-smoking zone though an exception has been made for MPs. North Block, which houses the home and finance ministries, too has a designated smoking area. “It is ironical that a law passed by Parliament that is the law of the land now is violated by Parliament itself,” said Dr P C Gupta, visiting scientist at the Harvard School of Public Health and director of Healis Sekhsaria Institute, which has taken the matter up with Mahajan.

“This sets a very bad precedent for the entire country. If Parliament does not respect its own laws, who will? The law is very clear about who can have designated smoking areas and all public places are to be smoke-free and Parliament by any standard is a public place,” said Gupta, who is also an adjunct professor, at department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina.

He added that this is purely a legal matter as it involved violation of a law by the very people who made it. According to the law, only hotels with 30 or more rooms or restaurants with a seating capacity of 30 or more and airports can have smoking areas.

Meanwhile, a contempt petition has been filed in Rajasthan High Court against the Ministry of Health for not implementing last year’s order for larger pictorial warnings on tobacco pack after the high court in June asked the ministry to implement it. The contempt petition will be heard on August 17.

The court was responding to a public interest litigation, when it had ordered the central and the state governments to immediately implement the 2014 rules under the anti-tobacco law that mandated increase of pictorial warnings on tobacco packets to 85 per cent of the principal display area. The implementation of those rules was kept in abeyance through a corrigendum by the ministry on March 26 this year — five days before they were to have come into effect on April 1 — at the interim recommendation of a committee of subordinate legislation.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. T
    Aug 6, 2015 at 12:39 pm
    they onlu under stand when Rober Vadra speaks about their character
    1. Agastya M
      Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 am
      Non smokers must pay double the taxes on all public amenities. Currently they're enjoying unfairly free facilities provided by cigarette taxes. Don't forget 15 million farmers are involved in growing tobacco. If the foolishness of imaginary health concerns is not overcome there will be a revolution. Mind it!
      1. R
        R. Jagannathan
        Aug 6, 2015 at 4:05 am
        "Indignance is the mother of somnolence". Quite the opposite in this case of the benevolence of the MPs sanctioned with a smoking room. It is farsaken British atude to smoke and parliament and douche with port wine at the House of Lords quite after luncheon. The English resented such practices, but atudinally habituated the same after procedural court hearings in the Common rooms of the Bailiff Courts in London, England as a matter of honour to the greatness of the recountance. I, for instance accept light smokers and reserved consumers of what is denoted allowed habits in succour of the law but not quite the recountances of it. Sir Winston Churchill pively educated the w of Britain the same as Britons would remember its implications in the w of the English language speaking world. Nonetheless, none can forget the cigar and the English hat with its creuves when one thinks of a smoking room or parlour in many a place in this world even to this day.
        1. C
          Curious onlooker
          Aug 6, 2015 at 7:57 am
          Smoking a cigarette, not the banned stuff, is a fundamental right.
          1. S
            Aug 6, 2015 at 8:33 am
            Supid activists! There is a smoking lounge even in airports now.
            1. Load More Comments