Law Minister not given proper information about how judiciary functions: CJI

Sathasivam rejected Kapil Sibal's view that accountability process in judiciary was exceptionally weak.

By: Press Trust of India | New Delhi | Published:February 12, 2014 8:39 pm

Chief Justice of India P Sathasivam on Wednesday rejected Union Law Minister Kapil Sibal’s view that accountability process in judiciary was exceptionally weak, saying all complaints against judges are dealt according to the existing mechanism.

At present, no request of the government or any of its agencies is pending in the Supreme Court, he said. “I have utmost regard for our honorable Law Minister. Unfortunately he was not given accurate and proper information about the role of judges and how the judiciary functions.

“The mechanism to deal with complaints against sitting judges of the Supreme Court and the high courts is provided in the in-house procedure,” he said in his valedictory address during CVC’s golden jubilee celebrations.

He was referring to Sibal’s remarks on Tuesday that the process of accountability within the judiciary was “exceptionally weak”.

“Unless the CJI in his individual capacity grants sanction, there can be no process of investigation. And, therefore, you see very few instances of people being brought to book,” the minister had said.

Sathasivam spoke in detail about the procedure in place to deal with such cases against judges of Supreme Court, high courts and other subordinate courts and employees working under them.

The complaints received by the CJI are examined and ultimately if it is found that deeper probe is required into the allegations contained, a three-member committee is constituted for making fact-finding inquiry, he said.

“If the Committee reports that the misconduct disclosed is so serious as to call for initiation of proceedings for removal of the concerned judge, the Chief Justice of India may advise the concerned judge to resign or seek voluntary retirement or withdraw judicial work and the government may be intimated that this has been done since allegations are so serious as to warrant initiation of proceedings for removal of the concerned judge,” he said.

“A copy of the report is furnished to the concerned judge. At present, no request of the government or any of its agencies is pending in the Supreme Court,” he said.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. G
    Guest
    Feb 13, 2014 at 12:36 am
    Most of India's problems today exist because the judicial system has gone abysmal. Yet judiciary in India doesn't think it's answerable to anyone?The so-called 'contempt of court' phrase.. Is it a justice system or a hush-up system?Section 377 got reinstated and still my countrymen feel the need to categorically state every single time that they "respect" supreme court's this verdict. Really?Why can't we have more competent judges and politicians? Just why?Why shouldn't there exist better tests to select judges?In 21st century world, a court judge must also have some knowledge of science and technology to get a better perspective on a case.And why shouldn't there be better mechanisms for judicial accountability?
    Reply
  2. G
    Guest
    Feb 13, 2014 at 12:36 am
    Most of India's problems today exist because the judicial system has gone abysmal. Yet judiciary in India doesn't think it's answerable to anyone?The so-called 'contempt of court' phrase.. Is it a justice system or a hush-up system?Section 377 got reinstated and still my countrymen feel the need to categorically state every single time that they "respect" supreme court's this verdict. Really?Why can't we have more competent judges and politicians? Just why?Why shouldn't there exist better tests to select judges?In 21st century world, a court judge must also have some knowledge of science and technology to get a better perspective on a case.And why shouldn't there be better mechanisms for judicial accountability?
    Reply
  3. A
    ARVIND
    Feb 12, 2014 at 4:50 pm
    I beg to differ with the Honble CJI.I complained against Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad of his court and sought sanction to prosecute him. No action was ever taken.
    Reply
  4. A
    ARVIND
    Feb 12, 2014 at 4:50 pm
    I beg to differ with the Honble CJI.I complained against Justice Chandramauli Kumar Prasad of his court and sought sanction to prosecute him. No action was ever taken.
    Reply
  5. O
    omkars
    Feb 12, 2014 at 5:04 pm
    Judicial system in India is a joke. Just read the judgment recently over rights and you will laugh at the level of illiteracy among judges. They are also very touchy about any criticism. In the end,judges and judiciary reflect what kind of society we are. Politicians,judges,teachers,doctors ,engineers,writers basically belong to same mediocre system we have created. Judges cannot be a breed apart.
    Reply
  6. O
    omkars
    Feb 12, 2014 at 5:04 pm
    Judicial system in India is a joke. Just read the judgment recently over rights and you will laugh at the level of illiteracy among judges. They are also very touchy about any criticism. In the end,judges and judiciary reflect what kind of society we are. Politicians,judges,teachers,doctors ,engineers,writers basically belong to same mediocre system we have created. Judges cannot be a breed apart.
    Reply
  7. H
    Harsh Ostwal
    Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 am
    Most of India's problems today exist because the judicial system has gone abysmal. Yet judiciary in India doesn't think it's answerable to anyone?The so-called 'contempt of court' phrase.. Is it a justice system or a hush-up system?Section 377 got reinstated and still my countrymen feel the need to categorically state every single time that they "respect" supreme court's this verdict. Really?Why can't we have more competent judges and politicians? Just why?Why shouldn't there exist better tests to select judges?In 21st century world, a court judge must also have some knowledge of science and technology to get a better perspective on a case.And why shouldn't there be better mechanisms for judicial accountability?
    Reply
  8. H
    Harsh Ostwal
    Feb 13, 2014 at 12:34 am
    Most of India's problems today exist because the judicial system has gone abysmal. Yet judiciary in India doesn't think it's answerable to anyone?The so-called 'contempt of court' phrase.. Is it a justice system or a hush-up system?Section 377 got reinstated and still my countrymen feel the need to categorically state every single time that they "respect" supreme court's this verdict. Really?Why can't we have more competent judges and politicians? Just why?Why shouldn't there exist better tests to select judges?In 21st century world, a court judge must also have some knowledge of science and technology to get a better perspective on a case.And why shouldn't there be better mechanisms for judicial accountability?
    Reply
  9. Load More Comments