Upset India calls off Foreign Secy talks, says ‘unacceptable’; Islamabad terms it a setback to peace efforts

The foreign secretaries of India and Pakistan were scheduled to meet on August 25 in Islamabad.

By: Express News Service Written by Shubhajit Roy | New Delhi | Updated: August 18, 2014 10:31 pm
Pakistan's interference in India's internal affairs "not acceptable", Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh told Pakistan High Commissioner. (Source: AP) Pakistan’s interference in India’s internal affairs “not acceptable”, Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh told Pakistan High Commissioner. (Source: AP)

In a strong message to Islamabad, the Narendra Modi government on Monday called off the Foreign Secretary-level talks with Pakistan, an hour after Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit met Kashmiri separatist leader Shabir Shah here. Two other separatist leaders — Syed Ali Shah Geelani and Yasin Malik — are scheduled to meet Pakistan High Commission officials on Tuesday.

This is a serious setback to the efforts to restart the dialogue process, which have been stalled since January 2013. Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh was scheduled to travel to Islamabad for talks with her Pakistani counterpart Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhary on August 25. The last meeting between the Foreign Secretaries of the two countries took place in Islamabad in September 2012.

“Foreign Secretary (Sujatha Singh) conveyed to the Pakistan High Commissioner today, in clear and unambiguous terms, that Pakistan’s continued efforts to interfere in India’s internal affairs were unacceptable. It was underlined that the Pakistani High Commissioner’s meetings with these so-called leaders of the Hurriyat undermines the constructive diplomatic engagement initiated by Prime Minister Modi in May on his very first day in office,” said the Ministry of External Affairs’ official spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin in a sharply-worded response.

“Therefore, under the present circumstances, it is felt that no useful purpose will be served by the Indian Foreign Secretary going to Islamabad next week. Foreign Secretary’s visit to Islamabad for talks on 25 August stands cancelled,” he said.

Akbaruddin underlined that at a time when serious initiatives were being undertaken by the Centre to push bilateral ties, including resumption of a regular dialogue process, the invitation to “so-called leaders” of the Hurriyat by Pakistan’s High Commissioner “does indeed raise questions about Pakistan’s sincerity, and shows that its negative approaches and attempts to interfere in India’s internal affairs continue unabated”.

The only path available to Pakistan is to resolve outstanding issues through a peaceful bilateral dialogue within the framework and principles of the Simla Agreement and the Lahore Declaration, he said.

Reacting to the move by India, Pakistan Foreign office said, “The Indian decision is a setback to the efforts by our leadership to promote good neighbourly relations with India.”

Clarifying the meeting of the Pakistani High Commissioner Abdul Basit’s meeting with the separatist groups, the Foreign office said: “It is a long-standing practice that prior to Pakistan-India talks, meetings with Kashmiri leaders are held to facilitate meaningful discussions on the issue of Kashmir.”

The Pakistan High Commission’s decision to meet separatist leaders ahead of the Foreign Secretary-level talks is unusual. The separatist leaders are usually invited by the Pakistan High Commission for their National Day function on March 23, or during visits by Pakistan’s Foreign Ministers or Foreign Secretaries.

South Block has always expressed displeasure at such meetings between visiting Pakistan dignitaries and Hurriyat leaders. The last such meeting was in November 2013, when the then External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid described the meeting between separatist leaders and Pakistan’s Foreign Affairs Advisor Sartaj Aziz as “insensitive” and “counterproductive”.

In fact, mindful of India’s sensitivities, Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif did not meet the Hurriyat leaders when he visited India to attend Modi’s swearing-in ceremony on May 26.

The decision to hold Foreign Secretary-level talks was taken in July-end, less than two months after Modi and Sharif agreed that the top diplomats would keep in touch. The Islamabad meeting, described by government sources as “talks about talks”, was expected to discuss the roadmap ahead.
Singh spoke with Chaudhary on July 23, and conveyed her decision to fly to Islamabad on August 25 for a bilateral meeting. During her telephone conversation, Singh also raised the issue of ceasefire violations. She stressed that “incidents of this nature will impede the positive work” that the political leaders of the two countries wished to take up. She reiterated that meaningful cooperation between the two countries cannot take place alongside violence.

In the last few weeks, the ceasefire violations have been on the rise. However, New Delhi was categorical about linking the cancellation of talks with Basit’s meeting with separatist leaders.

Earlier in the day, after his meeting with Basit, Shabir Shah said he has asked for trilateral (India, Pakistan and Kashmir representatives) talks on Kashmir.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Madhu Bahl
    Aug 18, 2014 at 7:12 pm
    I agree with the decision taken by the Indian government of not to partite in the impending Secretary-level meeting on August 25th. Since its birth for its survival, stan has been pursuing a dual-faced policy not only with India, but with the United States also - the main donor of stan's exchequer. stan wants to keep the diplomatic door open with India while abetting, financing and keeping a close relationship with the proxy enies in Kashmir. These few Hurriyat leaders are serving stan's interest in fomenting chaos in Kashmir. These Hurriyat leaders also need to be brought to the books due to their anti-India relationship with the leaders of stan. What these leaders are doing is a symptom of treason and need to face a legal music accordingly. The idea of earmarking crores of rupees to bring back Kashmiri Brahmins and creating jobs in Kashmir are very positive and creditworthy steps announced by the Central government. Once the employment situation in Kashmir is improved, the Muslim youngsters who are in the streets every day with an anti-India banners, will be working in the office and become productive instead of being a destructive force. As far as stan is concerned, it is going through a lot of turmoil due to the pressure from PTI and PAT parties who are demanding Prime Minister's resignation. Under the cirstances, the Indian government ought to wait for the final outcome. It is possible that Nawaz Sharif may not remain in the office for a long time. Let the dust settle before making any diplomatic move.
    1. D
      Dushyant Pradhan
      Aug 18, 2014 at 1:33 pm
      Meeting of a top stani diplomat with Kashmiri separatists in the midst of persistent ceasefire violations by stan can be construed as an "Act of war upon India". Harsher response required from our side.
      1. D
        Aug 18, 2014 at 3:30 pm
        A late reaction. A weak reaction. Why no steps were taken much earlier to thwart the meet itself? BJP is gradually going the congress way. May be in the path of winning less than 50 seats in the next election.
        1. P
          Aug 18, 2014 at 5:39 pm
          Why does not the stan Govt. and the Foreign Minister accepts in unambiguous terms that they are under pressure from terrorists, their own military and the Kashmiri separatists whom India recongnises as anti-nationals and terrorists. In that case they should appeal the Indian Govt. to talk to military and ISI top bres which is again as futile as any other effort for peace. In short, India should not keep airing its intentions of peace with stan, apparently to UNO and US. Instead it should come out with a clear demand of vacating POK by stan as well as China - or a war to achieve the objective in a defined time frame.
          1. B
            Aug 18, 2014 at 9:22 pm
            how can this be tolerated? a foreign envoy Openly meeting terrorists and encouraging terrorism while under cover of diplomatic guise?this is the height of stupid behaviour of this person. Surely this envoy must be arrested for indulging in terrorist activity on our soil , there cannot be geneva convention allowing for this to happen. Why is there not a FIR lodged against this guy.What is our government doing. Should they not cancel his diplomatic card and send him home?
            1. Load More Comments