In SC today: Can unwed mother be child’s guardian without father’s nod?

In this case, the woman has questioned this need, saying any disclosure would create more problems for both parents.

Written by Utkarsh Anand | New Delhi | Published: July 6, 2015 3:27 am
Supreme Court, Vikramjit Sen, Guardians and Wards Act, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, Delhi High Court, congress, india news, nation news, news There is already a provision in the Constitution that any person can be appointed as a minister and he has to be elected to any House within six months of such appointment.

Can an unwed mother be the legal guardian of her child without the consent of the father?

On Monday, a Supreme Court bench led by Justice Vikramjit Sen will rule upon an appeal by a woman who has challenged the procedural necessity of involving the father of her child in a guardianship petition even though she never married him.

According to her petition, the father does not even know that the child exists.

The Guardians and Wards Act and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act require that a notice be sent to the child’s father to obtain his consent when a plea for guardianship is moved.

Share This Article
Related Article

In this case, the woman has questioned this need, saying any disclosure would create more problems for both parents. She has also asserted her right not to disclose the parentage, arguing that the father had nothing to do with the upbringing of the child.

The woman has pointed out that if identifying the father is not mandatory on a passport application form, this can be allowed in a guardianship case, too, under “exceptional circumstances”.

With a trial court in Delhi and the High Court ruling against the woman, she filed an appeal in Supreme Court in 2011. In 2014, the court appointed senior advocate Sidharth Luthra to assist it.

The former Additional Solicitor General highlighted two aspects of the case — the right of a child to know about and have the affection of his father, and the father’s right to have knowledge and access to the child.

Citing the ruling in the case of Congress leader N D Tiwari, who accepted a son born out of wedlock following a DNA test, Luthra pointed out that the right of a child to know about the father has been acknowledged as a facet of the fundamental right to life.

About the woman’s right not to reveal the parentage of the child, Luthra said: “Even though an unwed mother does have a right to not disclose the parentage of a child to the world, the said right cannot prevail over the right of a child to know about his roots and origin.”

According to, Luthra, the best interests of the child would require knowledge of the father and a response from him when the mother seeks her appointment as the sole legal guardian.

He also differentiated between a case in which a child has been abandoned and this one, where the father does not even know about the child.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

  1. Mohammad Bin Tughlaq
    Jul 6, 2015 at 6:10 am
    I would say the child belongs to the mother. It is up to her to reveal or not to reveal who the father of the child is. But in all fairness the child should be told who the father is if he or she wants to know. What happens to a child born of a rape by unknown persons? How the mother can tell the child? But the father cannot absolve of his responsibilities for upbringing the child born from his sperm. If the demands the father should provide maintenance for the upkeep of the child. If the father wants to dispute the claim of the mother then DNA of the father and the child should be compared. A man cannot sow his seed and go away. Neither he can harvest the crop unless the land allows.
    1. Indrani Rampersad
      Jul 6, 2015 at 7:45 am
      The mother is the natural first caretaker and nurturer of the child. she is the first guardian. and if single, she is the only guardian. what's so hard to understand?
      1. P
        Jul 6, 2015 at 8:16 pm
        Supreme Court should go a step further and rule that “every mother is the natural and legal guardian of a child”. This is the stance in the developed nations. Mother is the one who gave birth so if she is unwed she is the sole guardian. If the man wanted rights over the child, he should have married her.
        1. M
          meet sorathiya
          Jul 6, 2015 at 8:29 am
          I m only says maa is maa.have u anytime heared father is father the answer is no so I think sc give the right of Gardiner to mother.
          1. S
            Jul 6, 2015 at 9:27 am
            Mother is the natural first caretaker and nurturer of the child. she is the first guardian, it is true.. but if mother is single then the child may not get the complete guidance. We cant change the nature anyway..
            1. Load More Comments