HC extends stay on laying of road leading to Badals’ resort

The resort is owned by Sukhbir Singh Badal and his wife, Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur.

By: Express News Service | Chandigarh | Published:May 30, 2015 2:07 am
Sukhbir Singh Badal, Sukhbir Badal hotel, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, Harsimrat Kaur hotel, Badals, Punjab Badals hotel, Greater Mohali, Greater Mohali Development Authority, GMADA, Harsimrat Kaur Badal luxury resort, Badal luxury resort, Sukhbir Singh Badal, social impact assessment, SIA report, indian express, Punjab news, sukhbir singh badal news, badal news, city news, nation news Work in progress on the new road leading to Badals’ resort. (Express Photo by: Kamleshwar Singh)

Issuing notice to the Punjab government on the petitioner’s request for impleading Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal as party in the case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has ordered continuance of a stay till July 1 on construction of the 100-foot road, on the petitioner’s land, leading to the upcoming Metro Eco Green Resorts in SAS Nagar. The resort is owned by Sukhbir Singh Badal and his wife, Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur.

A Division Bench comprising Justices AK Mittal and Rekha Mittal was hearing the case on Friday. The petitioner informed the court that from the government authorities’ reply filed on May 27, it transpires that objections under Section 15 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, have been decided by the deputy CM, who has a large number of shares in the resort. It is a matter of record that even the social impact assessment report was approved at the level of the deputy CM, it was added. Hence, the petitioner pleaded that Sukhbir be impleaded as party in the case.

Share This Article
Share
Related Article

The Indian Express had first reported on May 19 about the road construction from Majra T-junction (Chandigarh-Kurali-Siswan T-junction) to Palanpur in Kharar tehsil of SAS Nagar district, leading to the resorts. However, V N Zade, special secretary of department of housing and urban development, in his reply informed the court that the petitioner’s request to implead the CM and others as party in the case was illegal since she had now made such allegations in her subsequent application, which are not part of her main petition.

The officer submitted that the petitioner has submitted “vague and fanciful allegations” without proper verification and her land has been acquired for “public purpose”.

The case will come up for hearing on July 1.

For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App

    Live Cricket Scores & Results