The Bombay High Court Friday dismissed an appeal filed by Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, the prime accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, seeking bail.
Observing that the evidence clearly indicated she was the “main conspirator” behind the explosion that killed five Muslims on September 29, 2008, the court refused to grant bail to Thakur, who has spent over five years in jail.
Finding no fault in the order of a special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court that had rejected Thakur’s bail application on September 25, 2012, a division bench of Justices P V Hardas and A S Gadkari observed: “Taking into consideration the material available on record, it cannot be said the appellant (Thakur) is not guilty of the offence for which she is charged. The material available on record clearly indicates that the appellant is a conspirator and had actively helped the other co-accused by providing a motorcycle for the explosion of a bomb at Malegaon. We are of the opinion that a strong prima facie case against the appellant exists on the basis of material available on record and the same is sufficient to deny bail to the her.”
- Varun Gandhi Under Attack Over Defence Deals: Here’s How
- This Diwali, Let Blind Students Brighten Up your Homes With Candles & Diyas
- CBI Files Supplementary Chargesheet In Sheena Bora Murder Case
- Soha Ali Khan And Vir Das Starrer 31st October Audience Reaction
- Sahara Chief Subrata Roy’s Parole Extended Till November 28
- Simple Tips To Secure Your Debit Card From Fraudsters
- New Zealand & India Team Being Welcomed In Chandigarh
- Mumbai Call Centre Scam: All You Need To Know
- Jammu Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti Appeals To Police: Here’s What She Said
- Shocker From Ahmedabad: Find Out What Happened
- Bigg Boss 10 Day 3 Review: Celebs Fail To Do Well in First Task
- Airtel Offers 10GB Data At Rs 259 For New 4G Smartphone Users
- Aamir Khan Starrer Dangal’s Trailer Launched: First Impressions
- TMC Supporters Attack BJP Leader Babul Supriyo
- Sri Lankan Navy Apprehends 20 Indian Fishermen
The court also took note of the statement of co-accused Sudhakar Dhar Dwivedi alias Dayanand Pande’s confessional statement recorded under the MCOCA.
In his statement, Pande had stated that on June 29, 2008, a meeting was held in Jabalpur during which Thakur was present. “The appellant in his (Pande) presence, had told that she had asked Colonel Purohit (co-accused) to provide explosives for the protection of the Hindu community,” the court recorded.
Thakur’s lawyers U R Lalit, Rameshwar Gite and Ganesh Sovani argued that Pande retracted his statement and it was not corroborated.